Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 17:6 (2018) ► pp.882–906

Political myth as a legitimation strategy

The case of the golden age myth in the discourses of the Third Way

ORCID logo | University of Southampton
Golden age myths as an answer to political crises are a recurrent phenomenon. This article demonstrates how the idea of a past golden age as the answer to a crisis of society was employed in the discourses of the Third Way: At the turn of the 20th century, the Social Democrats (SPD) in Germany and New Labour in Britain employed a golden age myth to define their politics. Analysing a corpus of texts from the Labour Party and the SPD between 1990 and 2005, this article demonstrates how global ideological trends are locally legitimized differently through the use of local political myths. The major contribution to the field of political discourse analysis lies in the discussion of mythopoesis as a legitimatory strategy, as well as in the analysis of the local adaptation of the golden age myth, which draws on Laclau’s discourse theory and its idea of empty signifiers.
Keywords: comparative political discourse analysis, legitimation, political myth, empty signifier, one nation, Soziale Marktwirtschaft, Germany, United Kingdom, New Labour, SPD
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology, corpus and aims
  • 3.Political legitimation and the role of mythopoesis
    • 3.1Argumentative macrostructures of political discourse
    • 3.2The role of mythopoesis in political legitimation
    • 3.3Political myths as empty signifiers
  • 4.Discourse-historical context: Discourses of the Third-Way as social democratic reform discourses
  • 5.Findings and discussion
    • 5.1Argumentative macrostructures of the discourses of the Third Way
    • 5.2The golden age myth as a purposive topos in the discourses of the third way
    • 5.3‘One nation’ and ‘Soziale Marktwirtschaft’ as empty signifiers in national golden age myths
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17059.kra
References (64)
References
Austin, J. L. 1956. “A Plea for Excuses: the Presidential Address.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 571: 1–30. [URL] DOI logo
Bastow, Steve, and James Martin. 2003. Third Way Discourse: European Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2017. Retrotopia. Cambridge, Malden MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Bax, Stephen. 2011. Discourse and genre: Analysing language in context. Perspectives on the English language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. L. 1980. “Myth, Ritual, and Political Control.” Journal of Communication 30 (4): 166–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1991. The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark. 2000. “New Labour: a Study in Ideology.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (3): 277–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blair, Tony. 1995a. “Leader’s Speech, Blackpool 1994.” In Report of Conference: Annual Conference 1994, Special Conference 1995, edited by The Labour Party, 97–106. London: Labour Party. [URL]
. 1995b. “Speech to the Special Conference 1995.” In Report of Conference: Annual Conference 1994, Special Conference 1995, edited by The Labour Party, 289–92. London: Labour Party.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Leader’s Speech, Brighton 1997.” In The Labour Party Conference Verbatim Report, edited by The Labour Party, 68–73. London: Labour Party. [URL]
Blair, Tony, and Gerhard Schröder. 1999. Europe: The Third Way/Die Neue Mitte. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Accessed January 02, 2013. [URL]
Borchert, Jens. 1996. “Alte Träume und neue Realitäten: Das Ende der Sozialdemokratie.” In Das sozialdemokratische Modell: Organisationsstrukturen und Politikinhalte im Wandel, edited by Jens Borchert, Lutz Golsch, Uwe Jun, and Peter Lösche, 39–80. Reihe Europa- und Nordamerika-Studien 2. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buckler, Steve, and David P. Dolowitz. 2009. “Ideology, Party Identity and Renewal.” Journal of Political Ideologies 14 (1): 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Walter D. 1996. “Woher kommt und wohin treibt die Sozialdemokratie?” In Das sozialdemokratische Modell: Organisationsstrukturen und Politikinhalte im Wandel, edited by Jens Borchert, Lutz Golsch, Uwe Jun, and Peter Lösche, 23–38. Reihe Europa- und Nordamerika-Studien 2. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2002. An Introduction to English Morphology: Words and Their Structure. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul, and Christina Schäffner. 1997. “Discourse and Politics.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 206–30. Discourse studies 2. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1988. The Modern Social Conflict: An Essay on the Politics of Liberty: University of California Press. [URL] DOI logo
Fairclough, Norman. 2000. New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Isabela Fairclough. 2012. Political discourse analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Alan. 2003. Making sense of New Labour. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Flood, Christopher. 2002. Political Myth: A Theoretical Introduction. Theorists of Myth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1998. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Girnth, Heiko. 2015. Sprache und Sprachverwendung in der Politik: Eine Einführung in die linguistische Analyse öffentlich-politischer Kommunikation. 2. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Germanistische Arbeitshefte 39. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermanns, Fritz. 1989. “Deontische Tautologien: Ein linguistischer Beitrag zur Interpretation des Godesberger Programms (1959) der Sozialdemokratischen Partei Deutschlands.” In Politische Semantik: Bedeutungsanalytische und sprachkritische Beiträge zur politischen Sprachverwendung, edited by Josef Klein, 69–149. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heywood, Andrew. 2007. Political Ideologies: An Introduction. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hombach, Bodo. 1998. Aufbruch: Die Politik der neuen Mitte. München: Econ.Google Scholar
. 2000. The politics of the new centre. Cambridge, Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, David R. 2000. Discourse. Concepts in the social sciences. Buckingham [England], Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Josef. 2000. “Komplexe topische Muster: Vom Einzeltopos zur diskurstyp-spezifischen Topos-Konfiguration.” In Topik und Rhetorik: Ein interdisziplinäres Symposium, edited by Thomas Schirren and Gert Ueding, 623–49. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1980. “Argumentation und Argument.” Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 38 (3): 9–57.Google Scholar
Kopperschmidt, Josef. 1989. Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse. Problemata 119. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Koch, Eric (3/3/1964): Einde bezoek bondskanselier dr. Ludwig Erhard en gaf persconferentie in het Haagse Nieuwspoort, prof. dr. Erhard met sigaar [End of the visit of German Chancellor Dr Ludwig Erhard, who gave a press conference at Nieuwspoort in The Hague, Prof. Erhard with cigar]. National Archives of The Netherlands, 916–1335. Available online at [URL], accessed 9/3/2018.
Kranert, Michael. 2016. “Text and Context in the Discourses of the Third Way in Germany and the UK: A comparative Study of the Language of ‘New Labour’ and ‘Die Neue Mitte’.” PhD Thesis, School of European Languages, Culture and Society, UCL.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2010. The discursive construction of European identities: A multi-level approach to discourse and identity in the transforming European Union. Sprache im Kontext Bd. 35. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kuck, Kristin, and David Römer. 2012. “Metaphern und Argumentationsmuster im Mediendiskurs zur ‚Finanzkrise’.” In Krise, Cash & Kommunikation: Die Finanzkrise in den Medien, edited by Anja Peltzer, Kathrin Lämmle, and Andreas Wagenknecht, 71–93. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1990. New reflections on the revolution of our time. Phronesis. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Constructing Universality.” In Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left, edited by Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, and Slavoj Žižek, 281–307. Phronesis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2007. On populist reason. [New pbk. ed.]. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2014. The rhetorical foundations of society. London, Brooklyn, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
Mandelson, Peter, and Roger Liddle. 1996. The Blair Revolution: Can New Labour Deliver? London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
McGuire, Michael. 1987. “Ideology and Myth as Structurally Different Bases for Political Argumentation.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 24 (1): 16–26.Google Scholar
Nonhoff, Martin. 2006. Politischer Diskurs und Hegemonie: Das Projekt „Soziale Marktwirtschaft”. Sozialtheorie. Bielefeld: Transcript. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm, L. Olbrechts-Tyteca, John Wilkinson, and Purcell Weaver. 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2014. “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach: A Methodological Framework.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 66–96. London, New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seawright, David. 2010. The British Conservative Party and one nation politics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Seldon, Anthony. 2005. Blair. [2nd ed.]. London: Free.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1997. “The ‘Golden Age’ and National Renewal.” In Myths and Nationhood, edited by Geoffrey A. Hosking and George Schöpflin, 36–59. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stötzel, Georg, and Thorsten Eitz, eds. 2002. Zeitgeschichtliches Wörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Hildesheim, New York: Olms.Google Scholar
Tannock, Stuart. 1995. “Nostalgia critique.” Cultural Studies 9 (3): 453–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Labour Party, ed. 1995. Report of Conference: Annual Conference 1994, Special Conference 1995. London: Labour Party.Google Scholar
. 1997. New Labour – Because Britain Deserves Better. Labour Manifesto. Accessed May 29, 2012. [URL]
Torfing, Jacob. 1999. New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and éZiézek. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge Eng. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tudor, Henry. 1972. Political myth. Key concepts in political science. London: Pall Mall. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. [1992] 2016. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford studies in sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vorstand der SPD. 1998. Wir sind bereit: Fünf sichere Zeichen: Politisches Archiv der SPD.Google Scholar
Walter, Franz. 2009. Die SPD: Biographie einer Partei. Überarb. und erw. Taschenbuchausg. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. 1st American ed. Edited by Talcott Parsons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wengeler, Martin. 2003. Topos und Diskurs: Begründung einer argumentationsanalytischen Methode und ihre Anwendung auf den Migrationsdiskurs (1960–1985). Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 244. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1983. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Ugur-Cinar, Meral & Fatma Yol
2024. Constitutive representation of womanhood. Journal of Language and Politics 23:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Bennett, Samuel
2022. Mythopoetic legitimation and the recontextualisation of Europe’s foundational myth. Journal of Language and Politics 21:2 ► pp. 370 ff. DOI logo
Kuznyetsova, Ganna
2021. Political discourse from the standpoint of the addressee. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :23 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Sjögren, Maria
2021. Balancing the ideals of public participation. Journal of Language and Politics 20:2 ► pp. 304 ff. DOI logo
Henkel, Imke
2020. The witty Briton stands up to the European bully. How a populist myth helped the British Eurosceptics to win the 2016 EU referendum. Politique européenne N° 66:4 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Issel-Dombert, Sandra
2020. Using Mass and Pop Culture to Dominate Political Discourse: How the Left-Wing Party Podemos Conquered Spanish Living-Rooms with IKEA. In Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines, ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Kranert, Michael
2019. Populist Elements in the Election Manifestoes of AfD and UKIP. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 67:3 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Kranert, Michael
2020. Introduction: Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines. In Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Discourse and Political Culture [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 86], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.