Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 18:5 (2019) ► pp.760–781
Who are we?
Contesting meanings in the speeches of national leaders in Taiwan during the authoritarian period
This paper analyzes how political aspirations and convictions during Taiwan’s authoritarian period (from the 1940s to 1996) are expressed through first-person plural pronouns. Combining both corpus-assisted method and discourse historical analysis (DHA, Wodak et al. 1999), we compared the speeches delivered by the presidents – Chiang Kai-shek (CKS, 1955–1975), Chiang Ching-kuo (CCK, 1978–1988), and Lee Teng-hui (LTH, 1989–1996) – from the one-party domination era to the time of the direct presidential elections in 1996. Moreover, by locating lexical items in the co-texts and checking the collocates, we have tried to find referents of we against changing socio-political contexts. The meaning of we has changed from representing Chinese compatriots on the Chinese mainland and the revolutionary militia in CKS’s speeches to an over-inclusion and more hearer-dominant (HD) we in CCK’s speeches. A “wandering we” was found in LTH’s speeches with which a well-defined national collectivity was difficult to identify in the late 1980s.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1A Discourse historical approach (DHA) to national identities
- 2.2First person plural in political speeches
- 3.Data and methodology
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Methodology
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1 Women 我們 ‘we’ in CKS’s speeches
- 4.2 Women 我們 ‘we’ in CCK’s speeches
- 4.3 Women 我們 ‘we’ in LTH’s speeches
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Anthony, Lawrence
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourse of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–306. 
BBC News
n.d. “Taiwan Profile – Timeline.” Accessed December 6, 2018. [URL]
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer
2006 “Who Are We and Who Are You? The Strategic Use of Forms of Address in Political Interviews.” Text and Talk 26 (1): 3–37.
Cap, Pitor
2010 Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric, 2nd revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Chang, Hui-ching, and Richard Holt
2011 “Naming China: Taiwan’s National Day Speeches as Identity Politics.” Journal of Language and Politics 10 (3): 396–415.
2015 Language, Politics and Identity in Taiwan: Naming China. New York: Routledge.
Chang, Mao-kuei
2003 “On the Origin and Transformation of Taiwanese National Identities.” In Religion and the Formation of Taiwanese Identities, edited by Paul Katz and Murray Rubenstein, 23–58. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
De Cock, Barbara
2011 “Why We Can Be You: The Use of 1st Person Plural Forms with Hearer Reference in English and Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (11): 2762–2775.
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fell, Dafydd
Fetzer, Anita, and Peter Bull
2008 “Well, I Answer It by Simply Inviting You to Look at the Evidence.” Journal of Language and Politics 7 (2): 271–289.
Huang, Chu-Ren, and Kathleen Ahrens
2008 Taiwan Presidential Corpus. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2010 The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Lu, Louis W.-L., and Kathleen Ahrens
2008 “Ideological Influence on BUILDING Metaphors in Taiwanese Presidential Speeches.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 383–408.
Maitland, Karen, and John Wilson
1987 “Pronominal Selection and Ideological Conflict.” Journal of Pragmatics 11 (4): 495–512.
Mûhlhäusler, Peter, and Rom Harré
1990 Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Myers, Ramon, and Hsiao-ting Lin
2008 “Starting Anew on Taiwan.” The Hoover Digest: Research and Opinion on Public Policy 2008 (2). Accessed August 23, 2017. [URL]
Obeng, Samuel
2002 “The Language of Politics.” In Surviving Through Obliqueness: Language of Politics in Emerging Democracies, edited by Samuel Obeng and Hartford Beverly, 5–18. New York: NOVA Science Publishers, Inc.
Palmer, Frank R.
1986 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
ed. 2014 Constructing Collectivity: “We” across Languages and Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Proctor, Katarzyna, and Lily, I-W. Su
2011 “The 1st Person Plural in Political Discourse – American Politicians in Interviews and in a Debate.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (13): 3251–3266.
Petersoo, Pille
2007 “What Does ‘We’ Mean? National Deixis in the Media.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (3): 419–436.
Reisigl, Martin
2008 “Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, edited by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller, 243–267. Berlin: Mouton de Guyer.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetoric of Racism and Antisemitism. New York: Routledge.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1995 “Discourse Semantics and Ideology.” Discourse & Society 5 (2): 243–89.
2008 Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, John
1990 Politically Speaking. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
1999 The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.