After a record number of women were elected to the House of Commons in 1997, many incidents of sexism and abusive behaviour were reported. The aim of this article is twofold: on the one hand, to scrutinize the mechanisms and effects of sexist discrimination and stereotyping of women MPs in the House of Commons; on the other, to identify the strategies used by female (and male) MPs to subvert discriminatory representations, and to counteract gender-biased and sexist treatment. The focus of the multi-level analysis is on three recurrent strategies: objectifying women MPs through fixation on personal appearance rather than professional performance (e.g. making trivialising comments about women’s hair and dressing style); patronizing women MPs through the use of derogatory forms of address (e.g. directly addressing them by the terms of endearment “honey”, “dear”, “woman”); and stigmatizing women MPs through abusive and discriminatory labelling (e.g. ascribing to them stereotypically insulting names.
2002Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement with the State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Chappell, Louise
2006 “Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered ‘Logic of Appropriateness.’” Politics and Gender 2(2): 221–263.
Coates, Jennifer
2003 “Address.” In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, ed. by William J. Frawley, 33–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duffel, Nick
2015/2014Wounded leaders: The Psychohistory of British Elitism and the Entitlement Illusion. Lone Arrow Press.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
1992 “Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-based Practice.” Annual Review of Anthropology 211: 461–90.
Ehrlich, Susan, Miriam Meyerhoff, and Janet Holmes
2014Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality. Wiley-Blackwell.
Elliott, Cath
2011 “Cameron’s ‘Calm down, dear’ is a classic sexist put-down.” The Guardian [online] 27April 2011.
Fishman, Pamela
1983 “Interaction: The Work Women Do.” In Language, Gender and Society, ed. by Barry Thorne, Cheris Kramarae, and Nancy Henley, 89–101. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Gallagher, Michael, Michael Laver, and Peter Mair
2011Representative Government in Modern Europe. McGraw-Hill, London.
Gavison, Ruth E.
1992 “Feminism and the Private-Public Distinction.” Stanford Law Review 451: 1–45.
Gye, Hugo
2011 “Nadine Dorries storms out of Commons to schoolboy laughter after Cameron quips that she is ‘frustrated’”, Mail [Online] 8September 2011 Available at [URL] (Accessed 30 May 2018).
Hall, Kira, and Mary Bucholtz
(eds.)1995Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York and London: Routledge.
Harris, Sandra
2001 “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse and Society 12(4): 451–472.
Holly, Werner
1994 “Confrontainment: Politik als Schaukampf im Fernsehen.” In Medienlust und Mediennutz: Unterhaltung als offentliche Kommunication, ed. by Louis Bosshart and Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem, 422–434. Münich: Ölschläger.
Ilie, Cornelia
2000 “Cliché-based Metadiscursive Argumentation in the Houses of Parliament.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1): 65–84.
2010a “Analytical Perspectives on Parliamentary and Extra-parliamentary Discourses.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(4): 879–884.
Ilie, Cornelia
2010b “Strategic Uses of Parliamentary Forms of Address: The Case of the U.K. Parliament and the Swedish Riksdag.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(4): 885–911.
2013 “Gendering Confrontational Rhetoric: Discursive Disorder in the British and Swedish Parliaments.” Democratization 20(3): 501–521.
Ilie, Cornelia
2016 “Parliamentary Discourse and Deliberative Rhetoric.” In Parliaments and parliamentarism: A comparative history of disputes about a European concept, ed. by Pasi Ihalainen, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen, 133–145. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books.
Lakoff, Robin
2005 “Language, Gender and Politics: Putting “Women” and “Power” in the Same Sentence.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 161–178. Blackwell.
Lovenduski, Joni
2012 “Prime Minister’s Questions as Political Ritual.” British Politics 7(4): 314–340.
Lovenduski, Joni, and Azza Karam
2005 “Women in Parliament: Making a Difference.” In Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, ed. by Julie Ballington and Azza Karam, 187–198. Stockholm: IDEA.
Malley, Rosa
2011The Institutionalism of Gendered Norms and the Substantive Representation of Women in Westminster and the Scottish Parliament, PhD Thesis, University of Bristol.
Maltz, Daniel N., and Ruth A. Borker
1982 “A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication.” In Language and Social Identity, ed. by John J. Gumperz, 196–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McConnell-Ginet, Sally, Ruth Borker, and Nelly Furman
(eds)1980Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger.
McConnell-Ginet, Sally
2003 ““What’s in a Name?” Social Labeling and Gender Practices.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 69–97. Blackwell.
Pateman, Carol
1983 “Feminist Critiques of the Private-Public Dichotomy.” In Public and Private in Social Life, ed. by Stanley I. Benn and Gerald F. Gaus, 281–303. London: Croom Helm.
Pérez de Ayala, Soledad
2001 “FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting Needs? – Politeness in Question Time.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 143–169.
Puwar, Nirmal
1997Reflections on Interviewing Women MPs. Sociological Research Online 2(1).
Puwar, Nirmal
2004Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies out of Place. Oxford, UK and New York, USA: Berg.
Ross, Karen
1995 “Gender and Party Politics: How the Press Reported the Labour Leadership Campaign, 1994.” Media, Culture and Society 17(3): 499–509.
Shackle, Samira
2011 “PMQs Review: Same Old Insults, but Little Real Substance”, New Statesman [online] 9March 2011.
Shaw, Sylvia
2002Language and Gender in Political Debates in the House of Commons. PhD thesis, The Institute of Education, University of London.
Slack, James
2009 “Why Jacqui Smith was out of her depth and never up to the job of Home Secretary”, Daily Mail [online] 4June 2009.
Sones, Bonnie, Margaret Moran, and Joni Lovenduski
2005Women in Parliament: The New Suffragettes. London: Politicos.
Tannen, Deborah
1994Talking from 9 to 5: Women and Men in the Workplace: Language, Sex and Power. New York: Avon.
Thorne, Barrie, Cheris Kramarae, and Nancy Henley
(eds)1983Language, Gender and Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Walsh, Clare
2013Gender and Discourse: Language and Power in Politics, the Church and Organisations. London and New York: Routledge.
West, Candace
1995 “Women’s Competence in Conversation.” Discourse and Society 6(1): 107–131.
West, Candace and Don H. Zimmerman
1983 “Small Insults: A Study of Interruptions in Cross-sex Conversations between Unacquainted Persons.” In Language, Gender and Society, ed. by Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae, and Nancy Henley, 102–117. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Wodak, Ruth
2003 “Multiple Identities: The Roles of Female Parliamentarians in the EU Parliament.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, ed. by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 671–698. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wolfson, Nessa and Joan Manes
1980 “Don’t “dear” me!” In Women and Language in Literature and Society ed. by Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth A. Borker and Nelly Furman, 79–92. New York: Praeger.
Zimmerman, Don H.
1998 “Identity, Context and Interaction.” In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 87–106. London: Sage.
Cited by (4)
Cited by 4 other publications
Kostovicova, Denisa
2024. Discursive Interaction and Agency in Transitional Justice: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding► pp. 1 ff.
Miller, Cherry M.
2023. Between Westminster and Brussels: Putting the “Parliament” in Parliamentary Ethnography. Politics & Gender 19:2 ► pp. 533 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.