Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:5 (2019) ► pp.698–717

Alignment, ‘politeness’ and implicitness in Chinese political discourse

A case study of the 2018 vaccine scandal

| Dalian University of Foreign Languages | Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
| Dalian University of Foreign Languages
This paper aims to examine the ways in which official Chinese written monologues implicitly trigger alignment with the public in the wake of national social crises. Our understanding of alignment encompasses the attitude of creating an authoritative line of discourse, which in turn triggers the responsive alignment of the receivers with the decision makers. We believe that alignment is a fundamental concept to understand how linguistic politeness operates in political monologues such as gong’gao. Such texts are rich in forms of deference such as honorifics and other ritual phrases used towards Chinese politicians. The reason why such forms of politeness deserve special attention in language and politics is that they are not interpersonal, and their use correlates with implicit communication.
Keywords: Chinese political language, alignment, politeness, implicitness, announcements
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Objectives
  • 2.Data and methodology
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1‘Politeness’ and gong’gao in the media at national-level
    • 3.2‘Politeness’ and gong’gao in the media at provincial-level
    • 3.3Alignment in Chinese gong’gao monologues outside the scope of ‘politeness’
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18053.kad
References (36)
References
Angle, Stephen. 2009. Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Aditi. 2006. “Critical discourse analysis of political press conferences.” Discourse & Society 17(2): 173–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruti, Silvia. 2006. “Cross-cultural pragmatics: The translation of implicit compliments in subtitles.” JoSTrans: The Journal Specialised Translation 61: 185–197.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer. 2010. “Face, facework and political discourse.” International Review of Social Psychology 23(2/3): 155–185.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2020. (forthcoming). “Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’: The strategic use of ritual references to the Speaker of the UK House of Commons.” Pragmatics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 1990. “Politeness, politics and diplomacy.” Discourse & Society 1(2): 201–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul, Hailong Tian, and Ruth Wodak. 2010. “Reflections on discourse and critique in China and the West.” Journal of Language and Politics 9(4): 489–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dou, Weilin, and Xiaoying Zhang. 2007. “Cross-cultural pragmatic analysis of evasion strategy at Chinese and American regular press conferences – with special reference to the North Korean nuclear issue.” Caligrama (São Paulo. Online) 3(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2009. “Where cooperation meets politeness: Revisiting politeness models in view of the Gricean framework.” Brno Studies in English 35(1): 23–43.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John. 1999. “Face in cross-cultural political discourse.” Text 19(1): 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness phenomenon in modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 141: 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 1991. “Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Peter Scannell, 76–79. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra, Karen Grainger, and Louise Mullany. 2006. “The pragmatics of political apologies.” Discourse & Society 17(6): 717–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermanová, Andrea. 2017. Politeness strategies in foreign students’ written requests. MA dissertation retrieved from: [URL]
Holtgraves, Thomas. 2005. “The production and perception of implicit performatives.” Journal of pragmatics 37(12): 2024–2043. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Xiangying. 2006. “Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese press conferences: The case of the North Korea Nuclear crisis.” Discourse & Society 17(2): 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2014. “Heckling – A mimetic-interpersonal perspective.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2(1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017a. “Indirect ritual offence – A case of elusive impoliteness.” In Implicitness: From Lexis to Discourse, ed. by Piotr Cap and Marta Dynel, 177–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Sen Zhang. 2019 forthcoming. “(Im)politeness and alignment: A case study of public political monologues.” Acta Linguistica Academica 66(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ma, Laurence. 2005. “Urban administrative restructuring, changing scale relations and local economic development in China.” Political Geography 24(4): 477–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mao, LuMing. 1994. “Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed.” Journal of Pragmatics 211: 451–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obeng, Samuel. 1997. “Language and politics: Indirectness in political discourse.” Discourse & Society 8(1): 49–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pan, Yuling, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2011. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pocock, John. 1964. “Ritual, language, power: An essay on the apparent political meanings of ancient Chinese philosophy.” Political Sciences 16(1): 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roche, Jennifer, Rick Dale, and Gina Caucci. 2010. “Doubling up on double meaning: Pragmatic alignment.” Language and Cognitive Processes 27(1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. ed. 2000. Culturally Speaking. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2005. “(Im)politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Vladimir Žegerac. 2017. “Power, solidarity and (im)politeness.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 119–141. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Yuhua, Wenzhao Peng, and Hong Liu. 2015. “‘Yuyan de zhengzhi vs. zhengzhi de yuyan’ – zhengzhi yuyanxue de lilun yu fangfa (‘The politics of language vs. the language of politics’: The theory and practice of political linguistics).” Foreign Languages and Their Teaching 2801: 1–7.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 2017. “Facework and (im)politeness in political exchanges.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 739–757. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Shiquiong. 2017. “Iconicity and viewpoint: Antonym order in Chinese four-character patterns.” Language Sciences 591: 117–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Mayfair. 1997. “Mass media and transnational subjectivity in Shanghai: Notes on (re)cosmopolitanism in a Chinese metropolis”. In Ungrounded Empires: The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism, ed. by Aihwa Ong, and Donald Nonini, 287–321. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yu, Kyong-Ae. 2004. “Explicitness for requests is a politer strategy than implicitness in Korean.” Discourse and Cognition 11(1): 173–194.Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu & Dan Han
2024. The problem of translating Chinese policy-related expressions: a case study of wenming (‘civilised’). Text & Talk 44:3 ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Jing & Zhenqian Liu
2023. Evaluation Mechanism of Political Discourse: A Holistic Approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:6 ► pp. 2143 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Xi & Xiaoyu Sun
2023. A Bibliometric Study on Chinese Discourse (1994–2021). Critical Arts 37:3 ► pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Fu, Rongbo & Kefei Wang
2022. Hedging in interpreted and spontaneous speeches: a comparative study of Chinese and American political press briefings. Text & Talk 42:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Fengguang Liu & Juliane House
2020. (Im)Politeness and Chinese political discourse – An introduction. Discourse, Context & Media 35 ► pp. 100384 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Fengguang Liu, Juliane House & Wenrui Shi
2020. Reporting ritual political advice in the Chinese state media: A study of the National People’s Congress. Discourse, Context & Media 35 ► pp. 100388 ff. DOI logo
Mao, Yansheng & Xin Zhao
2020. A discursive approach to disagreements expressed by Chinese spokespersons during press conferences. Discourse, Context & Media 37 ► pp. 100428 ff. DOI logo
Ning, Puyu
2020. Book Review. Discourse, Context & Media 35 ► pp. 100385 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Ling
2020. Moral stance taking as a device of covert aggression in Chinese political language use. Discourse, Context & Media 36 ► pp. 100415 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.