Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:2 (2020) ► pp.331–351

Identity construction and negotiation in Chinese political discourse

A case analysis of the fire in the Daxing District

ORCID logo | Beijing Jiaotong University
Based on identity theory and previous studies of crisis discourse, this paper systematically analyzes the process of identity construction and negotiation between political discourse and social discourse representing the event of a fire at Xinjian Village, Daxing District in the southern suburb of Beijing. It is found that in the first phase, the political discourse focuses on the meta-discourse of “for Renmin’s sake, we carry out a campaign of thorough inspection, cleaning-up and rectification to eliminate safety hazards.” In the second phase of the event the Renmin category is then represented concretely as “residents”, “migrant workers”, “people who need help” and so on. These discursive practices have constructed a relatively acknowledged identification with the social groups concerned, and thus positively affect the governance and management of this crisis event.
Keywords: political discourse, fire in Daxing, identity negotiation, discourse strategy
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research data and objectives
  • 3.Literature review
    • 3.1Discourse construction of identity
    • 3.2Studies on crisis discourse
    • 3.3Renmin discourse
  • 4.Identity construction and consultation
    • 4.1Discourse participants and evaluation
    • 4.2Discourse construction and negotiation of Renmin
    • 4.3Discourse negotiation of “special campaign”
    • 4.4Collective demand and individual emotion
  • 5.The negotiation of the identity construction
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 March 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.18057.liu
References (37)
References
Benoit, William L. 1995. Accounts, Excuses and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Changfeng and Zhu Yingxue. 2018. “A Review of the Research on the Concept of ‘People’ in the Domestic Academia Since the New Century.” Socialism Studies 40(3): 144–152.Google Scholar
Chen, Chunlei. 2015. “Pragmatic Strategies of Network Public Opinion Crisis Management.” Academics 30(4): 177–184.Google Scholar
Chen, Lihong. 2017. “On Crisis Discourse from Burke’s Identification Theory.” Journal of Nanchang Hangkong University (Social Sciences) 19(3): 87–91, 119.Google Scholar
Chen, Xinren. 2013. “Pragmatic Identity: Dynamic Choice and Discursive Construction.” Foreign Languages Research 30(4): 27–32.Google Scholar
De Rycker, Antoon, and Zuraidah Mohd Don. 2013. Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Cambridge: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fan, Xiaoling. 2013. “The Absence of Subject Consciousness in Institutional Image Communication and Its Reconstruction: A Case Study on the Red Cross Crisis in the ‘Guo Meimei Scandal’.” Journal of East China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 45(5): 118–123.Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo, and Carita Paradis. 2014. “A Model of Trust-repair Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 74(4): 52–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gong, Shuanping. 2014. “A Pragmatic Analysis of Emotional Stance in Online Conflict Commentaries.” Modern Foreign Languages 37(2): 168–178.Google Scholar
Guo Xu, Ouyang Huhua. 2017. “Comparative Studies of the Interpersonal Meaning Construction in Chinese and American Crisis Response.” Discourse Studies Forum 3(1): 78–95.Google Scholar
Hu, Baijing. 2009. Crisis Communication Management: Schools, Paradigms and Realizations. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Martin, Denis Constant. 1995. “The Choices of Identity.” Social Identities 1(1): 5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James, and Peter White. 2005. The Evaluation of Language. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morley, John, and Paul Bayley (eds.). 2013. Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict: Wording the War. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ran, Yongping. 2010. “Pragmatic Survey of Crisis Discourse.” Foreign Language Education 3(1): 1–6.Google Scholar
Scheve, Christian Von, Veronika Zink, and Sven Ismer. 2016. “The Blame Game: Economic Crisis Responsibility, Discourse and Affective Framings.” Sociology 50(4): 635–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, Anbin. 2008. “The Western Paradigm of Crisis Communication Studies and Its Localization in Chinese Context.” Chinese Journal of International Journalism 30(6): 22–27.Google Scholar
Stryker, S. 1987. “Identity theory: Developments and Extensions.” In Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspectives, ed. by K. Yardley and T. Honess, 89–103. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tian, Hailong and Yin Jia. 2016. “Discourse and Public Sphere in China: A Study of Wu Ying’s Lawsuit Case.” Discourse Studies Forum 2(2): 93–107.Google Scholar
Tu, Jiajin. 2014. “The Argumentative and Rhetorical Mechanisms of Crisis Intervention Discourse.” Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Sciences) 35(2): 109–114.Google Scholar
Wang, Ke. 2015. “Renmin and Qunzhong are two Different Concepts: the concepts of Renmin and Qunzhong Revisited.” Business (141):471, 19.Google Scholar
Wang, Maokang. 2013. “On the Rhetorical Situation of Crisis Discourse.” (Ph. D dissertation) Shanghai International Studies University.Google Scholar
Wang, Xueyu. 2016. “A Struggle for Trustworthiness: Local Officials’ Discursive Behaviour in Press Conferences Handling Tianjin blasts in China.” Discourse & Communication 10(4): 412–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ware, B. L. and Wil A. Linkugel. 1973. “They Spoke in Defense of Themselves: On the Generic Criticism of Apologia.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 59(3): 273–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart. 2009. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. and Jo Angouri. 2014. “From Grexit to Grecovery: Euro/crisis Discourses.” Discourse and Society 25(4): 417–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Yichen. 2005. Crisis Communication: Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Public Relation and Language Arts. Suzhou: Suzhou University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Yong. 2009. “On the CPC’s Construction of the Discourse of “People” During the New Democratic Revolution and Its Significance.” CPC History Studies 2(2): 71–79.Google Scholar
Yuan, Zhoumin. 2016. “Defining Identity: Problems and Resolutions.” Foreign Language Education 37(4): 20–23.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jishu and Wang Xueyu. 2017. “The Pragmatic Identity Construction of American President in the Social Crisis Context.” Southeast Communication 13(1): 30–33.Google Scholar
Zhang, Weimin. 2015. “Discourse of Resistance: Articulations of National Cultural Identity in Media Discourse on the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake in China.” Discourse and Communication 9(3): 355–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Yang. 2016. “Temporal Construction of China’s Identity as a ‘Responsible Power’.” World Economics and Politics 30(7): 108–130, 159–160.Google Scholar
Zhou, Jianwei. 2016. “The Construction and Development of CCP’s Discourse of ‘Renmin’.” Teaching and Research 50(9): 67–76.Google Scholar
Zhou, Qing’an and Wu Yanni. 2017. “Discourse Construction in Identity Dilemma: European Identity in the Context of the News Coverage of.” Chinese Journal of European Studies 35(3): 1–19.Google Scholar