Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 18:6 (2019) ► pp.848–869

“Brexit means…”

UK vs. continental online-media users and English-language metaphoric conceptualizations

| Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Brexit, i.e. the withdrawal of the uk from the eu, is an event, which, regardless of its course and destination, has had a lasting impact on international politics. This paper offers a cognitive linguistic perspective on Brexit and investigates its conceptual metaphorizations on the first days after the uk referendum. The paper compares data from uk and non-uk eu media. The perspective adopted is that of Socio-Cognitive Studies in combination with quantitative analysis. The findings suggest there are significant differences between uk source domains and continental eu ones, e.g. overall metaphor use throughout the period is more pronounced in the uk sub-dataset; in the uk sub-dataset, divorce metaphorizations characterize either a ‘break-up’ between ‘two Britains’ or an uk-eu ‘break-up’; journey, disaster and war are more frequently used in the uk, while mechanical failure is more prominent in the continental sub-dataset. Overall, a preference for inanimate source domains characterizes both sub-datasets.
Keywords: Brexit, conceptualization, metaphor, online media, uk media, non-uk eu media
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Political and media background
  • 3.Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) background
  • 4.Dataset
  • 5.Analytical procedures
  • 6.Data and discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
  • Internet sources
Published online: 29 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19005.tin
References
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca
2016 “The Vocal Euro-outsider: The UK in a Two-speed Europe.” The Political Quarterly 87 (2): 238–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, Charlotte Galpin, and Ben Rosamond
2017 “Performing Brexit: How a Post-Brexit World Is Imagined Outside the United Kingdom.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (3): 573–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexandre-Collier, Agnès
2015 “Euroscepticism under Margaret Thatcher and David Cameron: From Theory to Practice”. Observatoire de la Société Britannique. [URL]. DOI logo
Black, Jeremy
2019 Britain and Europe: A Short History. London: Hurst and Company.Google Scholar
Bowdle, Brian F., and Dedre Gentner
2005 “The Career of Metaphor.” Psychological Review 112 (1): 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2005 Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Harold, Matthew Goodwin, and Paul Whiteley
2017 “Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of the 2016 Referendum Vote.” Parliamentary Affairs 70 (3): 439–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Beaugrande, Robert, and Wolfgang Dressler
1981 Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Burca, Grainne
2018 “How British was the Brexit vote?” In Brexit and Beyond, ed. by Benjamin Martill, and Uta Staiger, 46–54. London: UCL Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, Alice
2005 Metaphor and Data Set Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Đurović, Tatjana, and Nadežda Silaški
2018 “The End of a Long and Fraught Marriage: Metaphorical Images Structuring the Brexit Discourse.” Metaphor and the Social World 8 (1): 25–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam
2008 “How Metaphors Create Categories – Quickly.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, 67–84. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanhimäki, Jussi
2016 “What Can History Teach Us about Brexit?” [URL]
Hansson, Sten
2019 “Brexit and Blame Avoidance: Officeholders’ Discursive Strategies of Self-preservation.” In Discourses of Brexit, ed. by Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 191–207. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalogeropoulos, Antonis, Richard Fletcher, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
2019 “News Brand Attribution in Distributed Environments: Do People Know Where They Get Their News?” New Media and Society 21 (3): 583–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalogeropoulos, Antonis, Samuel Negredo, Ike Picone, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
2017 “Who Shares and Comments on News?: A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Online and Social Media Participation.” Social Media and Society, Oct-Dec: 1–12.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer
2019 Discourses of Brexit. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2018 “Metaphor in Media Language and Cognition: A Perspective from Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. The Journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Warsaw: De Gruyter Open III (1): 124–141.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2019 “Brexit and the Imaginary of ‘Crisis’: A Discourse Conceptual Analysis of European News Media”. Critical Discourse Studies. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
2002 Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The Neural Theory of Metaphor. DOI logo
2014 “SOTU 2014: The Cognitive Power of the President.” [URL]
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the Flesh. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Martill, Benjamin, and Uta Staiger
2018 Brexit and Beyond. London: UCL Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morozova, Olena
2017 “Monomodal and Multimodal Instantiations of Conceptual Metaphors of Brexit.” Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. The Journal of University of SS Cyril and Methodius in Trnava. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open II (2): 250–283.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2006 “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 21 (1): 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2017 “Truths, Lies and Figurative Scenarios – Metaphors at the Heart of Brexit.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (5): 641–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Metaphor Framing in Political Discourse.” Mythos-Magazin: Politisches Framing 11. [URL]
Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, et al
2017 Reuters Institute Digital News Report. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
2007 “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringmar, Erik
2008 “Metaphors of Social Order.” In Political Language and Metaphor, ed. by Terrell F. Carver, and Jernej Pikalo, 57–93. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1973 “Natural Categories.” Cognitive Psychology 41: 328–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975 “Cognitive Reference Points.” Cognitive Psychology 71: 532–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena
2008 Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad
2011 Cultural Conceptualisations and Language: Theoretical Framework and Applications. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Cultural Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard, Aletta G. Dorst, Berenike J. Herrmann, Anna Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Tryntje Pasma
2010 A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2006 “Dataset-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy.” In Dataset-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch, and Stefan Th. Gries, 1–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R.
2003 Linguistic Categorization (3rd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tincheva, Nelly
2019 “Conceptualizing Brexit: First Post-referendum Days’ Dynamics in Metaphorization.” International Journal of Language and Culture 6 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans-Jorg Schmid
2006 An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics (2nd edn.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
2017 Socio-Cognitive Discourse Studies. In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 26–44. Routledge: New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, Jochen, and Jan Helmig
2008 “Discursive Metaphor Analysis: (De)construction(s) of Europe.” In Political Language and Metaphor, ed. by Terrell F. Carver, and Jernej Pikalo, 119–131. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul
1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2014 “Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA)”. In International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Karen Tracy, 275–287. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2016 “We Have the Character of an Island Nation: A Discourse-historical Analysis of David Cameron’s “Bloomberg Speech” on the European Union.” [URL]
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
eds. 2015 Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (3rd edn.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zappettini, Franco
2018 “Europe at a Critical Legitimacy Juncture: Which People, Whose Values?” [URL]
Zappettini, Franco, and Michał Krzyżanowski
2019 “The Critical Juncture of Brexit in Media and Political Discourses: From National-populist Imaginary to Cross-national Social and Political Crisis”. Critical Discourse Studies, 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Internet sources

https://​trends​.google​.com​/trends​/story​/GB​_cu​_gUyXbFUBAABDoM​_en

https://​www​.bloomberg​.com​/news​/articles​/2016​-06​-25​/u​-k​-must​-leave​-eu​-as​-soon​-as​-possible​-foreign​-ministers​-says

http://​blog​.lboro​.ac​.uk​/crcc​/eu​-referendum/

https://​reutersinstitute​.politics​.ox​.ac​.uk​/our​-research​/uk​-press​-coverage​-eu​-referendum

https://​www​.prnewswire​.com​/news​-releases​/simmons​-research​-releases​-news​-media​-trust​-index​-300722931​.html

Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

McCormick, Lisa
2020. Marking time in lockdown: heroization and ritualization in the UK during the coronavirus pandemic. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 8:3 ► pp. 324 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.