Article published in:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:4 (2020) ► pp. 666690
References

References

Abts, Koen, and Stefan Rummens
2007 “Populism versus democracy.” Political studies 55 (2): 405–424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ajanovic, Edma, Stefanie Mayer, and Birgit Sauer
2018 “Constructing ‘the people’.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (5): 636–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove
2014 “How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters.” Comparative political studies 47 (9): 1324–1353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alvares, Claudia, and Peter Dahlgren
2016 “Populism, extremism and media: Mapping an uncertain terrain.” European Journal of Communication 31 (1): 46–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict
2006Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso Books.Google Scholar
Aragonès, Enriqueta, and Zvika Neeman
2000 “Strategic ambiguity in electoral competition.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12 (2): 183–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Batistová, Anna, and Nico Carpentier
2018 “Constructing the Czech nation.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (6): 713–743. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
2005 “Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canovan, Margaret
2005The people. Polity.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2017 “ ‘The people’ in populist discourse.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 582–594. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahlberg, Lincoln
2011 “Discourse theory as critical media politics? Five questions.” In Discourse theory and critical media politics, ed. by Lincoln Dahlberg, and Sean Phelan, 41–63. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin, and Nico Carpentier
2010 “Contesting the populist claim on ‘the people’ through popular culture: the 0110 concerts versus the Vlaams Belang.” Social Semiotics 20 (2): 175–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duvold, Kjetil, and Sten Berglund
2014 “Democracy between ethnos and demos: Territorial identification and political support in the Baltic states.” East European Politics and Societies 28 (2): 341–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Murray
1988Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Eric M.
1984 “Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication.” Communication monographs 51 (3): 227–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Jakob, and Ruth Wodak
2013 “Calculated ambivalence” and Holocaust denial in Austria.” In Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and John E. Richardson, 83–106. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Esser, Frank, Agnieszka Stępińska, and David Nicolas Hopmann
2016 “Populism and the media. Cross-national findings and perspectives”, In Populist political communication in Europe, ed. by Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Stromback, and Claes De Vreese, 365–381. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finlay, W. M. L.
2007 “The propaganda of extreme hostility: Denunciation and the regulation of the group.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 46 (2): 323–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glasze, Georg
2007 “The discursive constitution of a orld-spanning region and the role of empty signifiers: the case of Francophonia.” Geopolitics 12 (4): 656–679. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Handford, Michael
2014 “Cultural identities in international, interorganisational meetings: a corpus-informed discourse analysis of indexical we.” Language and Intercultural Communication 14 (1): 41–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A.
2014Venezuela’s Chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heinisch, Reinhard
2003 “Success in opposition–failure in government: explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office.” West European Politics 26 (3): 91–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jagers, Jan, and Stefaan Walgrave
2007 “Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium.” European journal of political research 46 (3): 319–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, Benjamin
2014 “Media populism: A conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects.” Communication Theory 24 (1): 42–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kulyk, Volodymyr
2018 “Shedding Russianness, recasting Ukrainianness: The post-Euromaidan dynamics of ethnonational identifications in Ukraine.” Post-Soviet Affairs 34 (2–3): 119–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto
1977Politics and ideology in Marxist theory: Capitalism, fascism, populism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
2005On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
2006 “Ideology and post-Marxism.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (2): 103–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Law, Alex
2001 “Near and far: banal national identity and the press in Scotland”. Media, Culture & Society 23 (3): 299–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liebes, Tamar, and Zohar Kampf
2009 “Black and white and shades of gray: Palestinians in the Israeli media during the 2nd intifada.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 14 (4): 434–453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liebes, Tamar
1997Reporting the Arab-Israeli conflict: How hegemony works. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipman, Maria, Kachkaeva, Anna, and Michael Poyker
2018 “Media in Russia: Between modernization and monopoly”. In The new autocracy: Information, politics, and policy in Putin’s Russia, ed. by Daniel Treisman, 159–190. Washington: Brookings.Google Scholar
Martin, Denis-Constant
1995 “The choices of identity.” Social identities 1 (1): 5–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayaffre, Damon, and Ronny Scholz
2017 “Constructing ‘the French people’ – On Sarkozy’s populism.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (5): 683–705. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro
2008 “Populism and the media”. In Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy, ed. by Daniele Albertazzi, and Duncan McDonnell, 49–64. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser
2018 “Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (13): 1667–1693. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas
2004 “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 542–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, John
1997 “Ethnos, demos and democratization: A comparison of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland.” Democratization 4 (2): 28–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu
1995 “Ethnocentricity of the nationalist discourse.” Nations and Nationalism 1 (1): 25–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pasitselska, Olga
2017 “Ukrainian crisis through the lens of Russian media: Construction of ideological discourse.” Discourse & Communication 11 (6): 591–609. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petersoo, Pille
2007 “What does ‘we’ mean?: National deixis in the media.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (3): 419–436. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, Sean, and Lincoln Dahlberg
2011Discourse theory and critical media politics: An introduction. In Discourse theory and critical media politics, ed. by Lincoln Dahlberg, and Sean Phelan, 1–40. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2017 “The discourse-historical approach.” In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 44–59. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rheindorf, Markus
2019Revisiting the toolbox of discourse studies: New trajectories in methodology, open data, and visualization. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul
1992Oneself as another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rojo, Luisa Martín, and Teun A. Van Dijk
1997 “ ‘There was a Problem, and it was Solved!’: Legitimating the Expulsion of Illegal ‘Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse & Society 8 (4): 523–566. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryabinska, Natalya
2014 “Media capture in post-communist Ukraine: Actors, methods, and conditions.” Problems of Post-Communism 61 (2): 46–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simons, Jon
2011 “Mediated construction of the people: Laclau’s political theory and media politics.” In Discourse theory and critical media politics, ed. by Lincoln Dahlberg, and Sean Phelan, 201–221. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis
2004 “Antinomies of formalism: Laclau’s theory of populism and the lessons from religious populism in Greece.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 253–267. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szostek, Joanna
2017 “The power and limits of Russia’s strategic narrative in Ukraine: The role of linkage.” Perspectives on Politics 15 (2): 379–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, Paul A.
2000Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Theodoropoulou, Irene
2019 “Social class struggle as a Greek political discourse.” Discourse & Society 30 (1): 85–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, Daniel
2018 “Rethinking Putin’s political order: Introduction”. In The new autocracy: Information, politics, and policy in Putin’s Russia, ed. by Daniel Treisman, 1–28. Washington: Brookings.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1998Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo V.
2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication”. Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vartanova, Elena
2012 “The Russian media model in the context of post-Soviet dynamics”. In Comparing media systems beyond the Western world, ed. by Daniel C. Hallin, and Paolo Mancini, 119–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2015The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Thousand Oaks: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “The ‘Establishment’, the ‘Élites’, and the ‘People’.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 551–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wroe, Lauren Elizabeth
2018 “ ‘It really is about telling people who asylum seekers really are, because we are human like anybody else’: Negotiating victimhood in refugee advocacy work.” Discourse & Society 29 (3): 324–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar