Beyond the exceptional
Tracing the repercussions of a security speech act
Liisa Lähteenmäki | University of Turku
Anne Alvesalo | University of Turku
Since the 1980s, debates on security have expanded and security has become a catchphrase in virtually every area
of life. In Finland, the government elected in 2003 began its four-year period in power by launching a special Internal Security
Programme (ISP) that stressed the threat of social exclusion. Altogether four ISPs have been launched in Finland since 2004. They all repeat the menace of social exclusion. In this article, we examine how
these speech acts materialised on the level of legislation. Our study suggests that in Finland, the securitization of exclusion
was only accepted in the media. Overall it ‘failed’, as on the level of law, internal security and exclusion were not, in the
main, connected when security measures were justified. On the other hand, we contend that by introducing more monitoring and less
privacy – especially among youth – the legislation effectively opened novel avenues for ‘security nothings’.
Keywords: Finland, content analysis, internal security, securitizing, social exclusion
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Constructing security as exception and routine in theory and practice
- 2.1The theory of securitization
- 2.2Social exclusion in Finland and in the contents of the ISPs
- 3.Data and methods
- 4.Analysis: Stressing crime and dodging exclusion
- 4.1Two groups of bills
- 4.2Increasing police powers and rewriting the penal code
- 4.3Reforming administration and expanding co-operation
- 5.Results: The absence of social exclusion in legislation referring to internal security
- 6.Conclusion: Identifying ‘security nothings’ beyond the exception
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 21 July 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19060.lah
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19060.lah
References
Aaltonen, Mikko, and Petri Danielsson
Balzacq, Thierry
Bardy, Marjatta, Minna Salmi, and Tarja Heino
Berghman, Jos
Bourbeau, Philippe
Bruun, Kari
Buzan, Barry
Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde
C.A.S.E.
Castel, Robert
Crawford, Adam
Crawford, Adam, and Steven Hutchinson
Demirsu, Ipek
Duke, Simon, and Hanna Ojanen
Eriksson, Johan, and Mark Rhinard
Floyd, Rita
Hiilamo, Heikki, Heikki Niemelä, Pertti Pykälä, Marja Riihelä, and Reijo Vanne
Huysmans, Jef
Ilmakunnas, Ilari, and Pasi Moisio
ISP
Korkman, Sixten
Lahti, Raimo
McDonald, Matt
Mythen, Gabe, and Sandra Walklate
Palola, Elina
2014 ”Tätä lakia voidaan soveltaa ainoastaan erittäin harkiten”. Nuoret koulutuspudokkaat ja toimeentulotuen perusosan alentamisen harkinta. [”This law may be applied only with great caution”. Using Discretion in Reducing the Basic Income Security of Young Dropouts.] In Harkittua? Avauksia sosiaaliturvan harkintavallan tutkimukseen ed. by Laura Kalliomaa-Puha, Toomas Kotkas, and Marketta Rajavaara, 96–113. Helsinki: Kelan tutkimusosasto.
Penttilä, Irmeli, Olli Kangas, Leif Nordberg, and Veli-Matti Ritakallio
Salter, Mark B.
Sandberg, Otso
Schuilenburg, Mark, and Ronald van Steden
Searle, John
Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright
Solhjell, Randi, Elsa Saarikkomäki, Mie, B. Haller, David Wästerfors, and Torsten Kolind
Trombetta, Maria J.
Virta, Sirpa