Constructing women’s “different voice”
Gendered mediation in the 2015 UK General Election
Since the 1990s, media commentators in the UK and elsewhere have praised women for introducing a “visibly
different style of politics”, one symbol of which is the alleged preference of female politicians for a less adversarial and more
co-operative style of political speech. Drawing on an analysis of the 2015 UK General Election campaign, we argue that this notion
of women’s “different voice” has become increasingly central to the media’s construction of prominent female politicians as public
figures, despite the evidence that it does not reflect any clear-cut pattern of differentiation between male and female political
speakers of equivalent status and experience. Though it may seem to be an advance on previous negative representations of female
politicians, we suggest that it reproduces – albeit in a “modernized” form – the long-established tendency of the media to
evaluate women in relation to gendered norms and expectations, while men are judged as individuals.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Gendered mediation and the representation of women’s political speech
- 3.“It was the women wot won it”: The press coverage of GE2015
- 4.The gendering of Nicola Sturgeon
- 5.Conclusion: Dilemmas of difference
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (21)
References
Banwart, Mary C. and Mitchell S. McKinney. 2005. “A Gendered Influence in Campaign Debates? Analysis of Mixed-gender United States Senate and Gubernatorial Debates”. Communication Studies, 561: 353–373.
Cameron, Deborah. 1997. “New Labour, No Feminism?” Trouble & Strife 351: 69–72.
Cameron, Deborah. 2007. The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cameron, Deborah and Shaw, Sylvia. 2016. Gender, Power and Political Speech: Women and Language in the 2015 UK General Election. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Carlin, Diana B. and Kelly L. Winfrey. 2009. “Have You Come a Long Way, Baby? Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin and Sexism in 2008 Campaign Coverage”. Communication Studies 60(4): 326–43.
Childs, Sarah. 2004. “A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons”. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (1): 3–19.
Gidengil, Elisabeth and Joanna Everitt. 2003. “Talking Tough: Gender and Reported Speech in Campaign News Coverage”, Political Communication, 20(3): 209–232.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Higgins, Michael and Fiona M. McKay. 2016. “Gender and the Development of a Political Persona: the Case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon”. British Politics 11(3): 283–300.
Loughborough University Communication Research Centre. 2015. Media Coverage of the 2015 Campaign: Report 5 [URL]
Meeks, Lindsey. 2013. “All the Gender That Fit to Print: How the New York Times Covered Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin in 2008”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 90(3): 520–539.
Ross, Karen. 2015. “Girls on Top, Who Knew? The Unpredictability of Pollsters and Publics”. In UK Election Analysis 2015: Media, Voters and the Campaign, ed. by Daniel Jackson and Einar Thorsen, 181. Political Studies Association/Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community, Bournemouth University.
Shaw, Sylvia. 2006. “Governed by the Rules? The Female Voice in Parliamentary Debates”. In Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts, ed. by Judith Baxter, 81–102. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Sreberny-Mohammadi, Annabelle and Ross, Karen. 1996. “Women MPs and the Media: Representing the Body Politic”. Parliamentary Affairs, 491: 103–115.
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Men and Women in Conversation. New York: Morrow
TNS Global. 2015. Nicola Sturgeon Tops the Approval Ratings for Leaders’ Performance. 29 April [URL]
Williams, Jennifer. 2019. ‘For Many, the Situation is Intolerable’ – What the Party Splits Say about Being a Woman in Politics. Manchester Evening News, February 24. [URL]
Winters, Kristi and Edzia Carvalho. 2015. “Why Did Nicola and Nigel Do So Well out of the Debates? They Are Authentic and Articulate, That’s Why”. Qualitative Election Survey of Britain (QESB) 2015, 3 May. [URL]
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Dai, Shih-chan & Navida Chun-Han Wang
2021.
To be (different) or not to be: The role of gender in constructing diplomatic speeches.
Women's Studies International Forum 88
► pp. 102506 ff.
Cameron, Deborah
2020.
Language, Sexism and Misogyny
The Reception of Women’s Political Speech
. In
Language, Gender and Hate Speech
A Multidisciplinary Approach
,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.