Protest graffiti, social movements and changing participation frameworks
The case of Macao
As a type of written discourse without guaranteed readership and response, protest graffiti nonetheless projects a
participation framework in which protesters address different participants, including not only the government but also other potential
‘participants’ in the social/cultural/political context. This paper studies a dataset of graffiti associated with a protest movement in
Macao, China. A survey of the longitudinal data reveals that the contents and visual representation of the graffiti have changed to reflect
evolving participation frameworks which are in response to different stages of social movements. While graffiti in earlier stages tends to
be more accusatory and anti-governmental, graffiti in later stages shows a shift of protesters’ position more in alignment with patriotism
and allegiance to authority. Instead of presenting views competing with mainstream political discourse, our data, with their multimodal
resources, draw heavily on Chinese cultural discourses which are supposedly shared among the protesters and addressees in this context.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Research background
- 1.2Pearl Horizon protest
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Participation framework
- 2.2Social movements
- 2.3Protest graffiti as political discourse
- 3.Methodology and data collection
- 4.Data analysis
- 4.1Stage A: Handwritten graffiti
- 4.2Stage B: Standardized graffiti
- 4.3Stage C: Picture-dominated graffiti
- 4.4Stage D: Color-dominated graffiti
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Transformation of graffiti and social movements
- 5.2Political functions and discursive construction of protest graffiti
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References