Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice
Edited by Benjamin De Cleen, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:1] 2021
► pp. 112–128

Doing justice to the agential material

A reflection on a non-hierarchical repositioning of the discursive and the material

ORCID logo | Charles University
Discourse theory has always paid explicit attention to the material dimension of social reality, with, for instance, the dislocation concept attributing an active role to the material. Still, it lacks attention for the specificity of the material-as-material, and tends to attribute a privileged position to the discursive as provider of meaning to these materials. This article argues that there is a need for a critical dialogue between discourse theory and new materialism, leading to the development of non-hierarchical approaches towards the discursive and the material realms. One particular approach, a model that is labelled the discursive-material knot, is proposed and developed in this article. This model expands the discourse-theoretical vocabulary so as to include bridging concepts such as invitation, investment and entextualisation. Moreover, it also allows for the development of new discursive-material research agendas, one of which, in relation to the environment and human-animal relations, is discussed.
Keywords: discourse theory, knot, new materialism, entanglement, dislocation, invitation, investment, entextualisation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse theory’s relationship to the material component of social reality
  • 3.Traces of the material and their limits
  • 4.Dislocations, invitations and investments
  • 5.Filling gaps and new agendas
  • 6.In conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20045.car
References (52)
References
Alexander, Richard J. 2009. Framing Discourse on the Environment. A Critical Discourse Approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen, with Rick Dolphijn, and Iris van der Tuin. 2012. “An Interview with Karen Barad.” In New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies, edited by Rick Dolphijn, and Iris van der Tuin, 48–70. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs. 1990. “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beirne, Piers. 2014. “Theriocide: Naming Animal Killing.” International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 3(2): 49–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burr, Vivien. 2003. Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico. 2017. The Discursive-Material Knot: Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. New York: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “The Prague Zoo Wolf Assemblage: Reflections on the Frontiers of the Discursive and the Material.” Fotograf 351: 4–7.Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico, Benjamin De Cleen, and Leen Van Brussel. 2019. “Introduction: Discourse Theory, Media and Communication, and the Work of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group.” In Communication and Discourse Theory: Collected works of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group, edited by Leen Van Brussel, Benjamin De Cleen, and Nico Carpentier, 3–31. Bristol, UK & Portland, OR, USA: Intellect.Google Scholar
Conty, Ariane F. 2018. “The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene.” Theory, Culture & Society 35(7–8): 73–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLanda, Manuel. 1996. The Geology of Morals. A Neo-Materialist Interpretation. Accessed 1 July 2020. [URL]
Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. The Beast and the Sovereign. Volume I1. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dingler, Johannes. 2005. “The Discursive Nature of Nature: Towards a Postmodern Concept of Nature.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7(3): 209–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dolphijn, Rick, and Iris van der Tuin, eds. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dourish, Paul, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2013. “Media as Material. Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organizational Practice.” How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies, edited by Paul R. Carlile, Davide Nicolini, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas, 92–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edward, Mark. 2008. “A (Brief) Critique of Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Analysis”, 11 September. Accessed 1 July 2020. [URL]
Figari, Helene, and Skogen, Ketil. 2011. “Social Representations of the Wolf.” Acta Sociologica 54(4): 317–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geras, Norman. 1987. “Post-Marxism?” New Left Review 1631: 40–82.Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason. 2012. “Body, Discourse, and the Turn to Matter.” In Language, Ideology, and the Human: New Interventions, edited by Sanja Bahun, and Dusan Radunović, 173–192. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory, London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griggs, Steven, and David Howarth. 2019. “Discourse, Policy and the Environment: Hegemony, Statements and the Analysis of U.K. Airport Expansion.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21(5): 464–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hajer, Maarten. 2005. “Coalitions, Practices, and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics, edited by David Howarth, and Jacob Torfing, 297–315. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hajer, Maarten, and Wytske Versteeg. 2005. “A Decade of Discourse Analysis of Environmental Politics: Achievements, Challenges, Perspectives.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7:3, 175–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hannigan, John. 2014. Environmental Sociology. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. 2004. “Cyborgs to Companion Species: Reconfiguring Kinship in Technoscience”, In The Haraway Reader, edited by Donna J. Haraway, 295–332. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2016. Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, Cynthia, and Robyn Thomas. 2015. “Discourse in a Material World.” Journal of Management Studies 52(5): 680–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1996. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, David. 1998. “Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” In Research Strategies in the Social Sciences, edited by Elinor Scarbrough, and Eric Tanenbaum, 268–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howarth, David, and Jacob Torfing, eds. 2005. Discourse Theory in European Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Alan. 2001. Sociology and the Environment. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan. 2003. Hegemony: A Realist Analysis. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleese, Deborah. 2002. “Contested Natures: Wolves in Late Modernity.” Society & Natural Resources 15(4): 313–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 1990a. “New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time.” In New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time, edited by Ernesto Laclau, 3–85. London: Verso.Google Scholar
, ed. 1990b. New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards A Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 1987. “Post-Marxism Without Apologies.” New Left Review I(166): 79–106.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2017. Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Lynn, William S. 2010. “Discourse and Wolves: Science, Society, and Ethics.” Society and Animals 181: 75–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marres, Noortje. 2012. Material Participation. Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. III Behrens. 1972. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
Mellor, Mary. 2000. “Feminism and Environmental Ethics: A Materialist Perspective.” Ethics and the Environment 5(1): 107–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petráček, Tomáš. 2017. Power and Exploitation in the Czech Lands in the 10th–12th Centuries: A Central European Perspective. Leiden, Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robisch, S. K. 2009. Wolves and the Wolf Myth in American Literature. Reno, Las Vegas: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
Schou, Jannick. 2016. “Ernesto Laclau and Critical Media Studies: Marxism, Capitalism, and Critique.” tripleC, 14(1): 292–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Liz, and Tim Richardson. 2001. “Reflections on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis in Planning and Environmental Policy Research.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 3(3): 193–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle. 2015. In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press/Meson Press.Google Scholar
Theodorakea, Ilektra Theodora, and Erica von Essen. 2016. “Who Let the Wolves Out? Narratives, Rumors and Social Representations of the Wolf in Greece.” Environmental Sociology 2(1): 29–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torfing, Jacob. 1999. New Theories of Discourse. Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Von Essen, Erica, Hans Peter Hansen, M. Nils Peterson, and Tarla R. Peterson. 2018. “Discourses on Illegal Hunting in Sweden: The Meaning of Silence and Resistance.” Environmental Sociology 4(3): 370–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wise, Michael D. 2016. Producing Predators: Wolves, Work, and Conquest in the Northern Rockies. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Bridges, Lauren E.
2024. Competing digital capacities: between state-led digital governance and local data center tradeoffs. Information, Communication & Society ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Logan, Jenny & Mallaigh McGinley
2023. Dissociation as Dislocation From Violence. Humanity & Society 47:3 ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Filimonov, Kirill & Nico Carpentier
2022. “First forced displacements, then slaughter”. Journal of Language and Politics 21:6 ► pp. 827 ff. DOI logo
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos & Yannis Stavrakakis
2021. Moving discourse theory forward. Journal of Language and Politics 20:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.