Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice
Edited by Benjamin De Cleen, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:1] 2021
► pp. 112–128

Doing justice to the agential material [*] *

A reflection on a non-hierarchical repositioning of the discursive and the material

ORCID logo | Charles University

Discourse theory has always paid explicit attention to the material dimension of social reality, with, for instance, the dislocation concept attributing an active role to the material. Still, it lacks attention for the specificity of the material-as-material, and tends to attribute a privileged position to the discursive as provider of meaning to these materials. This article argues that there is a need for a critical dialogue between discourse theory and new materialism, leading to the development of non-hierarchical approaches towards the discursive and the material realms. One particular approach, a model that is labelled the discursive-material knot, is proposed and developed in this article. This model expands the discourse-theoretical vocabulary so as to include bridging concepts such as invitation, investment and entextualisation. Moreover, it also allows for the development of new discursive-material research agendas, one of which, in relation to the environment and human-animal relations, is discussed.

Keywords: discourse theory, knot, new materialism, entanglement, dislocation, invitation, investment, entextualisation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse theory’s relationship to the material component of social reality
  • 3.Traces of the material and their limits
  • 4.Dislocations, invitations and investments
  • 5.Filling gaps and new agendas
  • 6.In conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20045.car
References
Alexander, Richard J.
2009 Framing Discourse on the Environment. A Critical Discourse Approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen
2007 Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen, with Rick Dolphijn, and Iris van der Tuin
2012 “An Interview with Karen Barad.” In New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies, edited by Rick Dolphijn, and Iris van der Tuin, 48–70. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs
1990 “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beirne, Piers
2014 “Theriocide: Naming Animal Killing.” International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 3(2): 49–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burr, Vivien
2003 Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico
2017 The Discursive-Material Knot: Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. New York: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “The Prague Zoo Wolf Assemblage: Reflections on the Frontiers of the Discursive and the Material.” Fotograf 351: 4–7.Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico, Benjamin De Cleen, and Leen Van Brussel
2019 “Introduction: Discourse Theory, Media and Communication, and the Work of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group.” In Communication and Discourse Theory: Collected works of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group, edited by Leen Van Brussel, Benjamin De Cleen, and Nico Carpentier, 3–31. Bristol, UK & Portland, OR, USA: Intellect.Google Scholar
Conty, Ariane F.
2018 “The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene.” Theory, Culture & Society 35(7–8): 73–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLanda, Manuel
1996 The Geology of Morals. A Neo-Materialist Interpretation. Accessed 1 July 2020. [URL]
Derrida, Jacques
2008 The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
2011 The Beast and the Sovereign. Volume I1. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dingler, Johannes
2005 “The Discursive Nature of Nature: Towards a Postmodern Concept of Nature.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7(3): 209–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dolphijn, Rick, and Iris van der Tuin
eds. 2012 New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dourish, Paul, and Melissa Mazmanian
2013 “Media as Material. Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organizational Practice.” How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies, edited by Paul R. Carlile, Davide Nicolini, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas, 92–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edward, Mark
2008 “A (Brief) Critique of Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Analysis” 11 September. Accessed 1 July 2020. [URL]
Figari, Helene, and Skogen, Ketil
2011 “Social Representations of the Wolf.” Acta Sociologica 54(4): 317–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geras, Norman
1987 “Post-Marxism?” New Left Review 1631: 40–82.Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason
2012 “Body, Discourse, and the Turn to Matter.” In Language, Ideology, and the Human: New Interventions, edited by Sanja Bahun, and Dusan Radunović, 173–192. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
2007 Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory, London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griggs, Steven, and David Howarth
2019 “Discourse, Policy and the Environment: Hegemony, Statements and the Analysis of U.K. Airport Expansion.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21(5): 464–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hajer, Maarten
2005 “Coalitions, Practices, and Meaning in Environmental Politics: From Acid Rain to BSE.” In Discourse Theory in European Politics, edited by David Howarth, and Jacob Torfing, 297–315. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hajer, Maarten, and Wytske Versteeg
2005 “A Decade of Discourse Analysis of Environmental Politics: Achievements, Challenges, Perspectives.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7:3, 175–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hannigan, John
2014 Environmental Sociology. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna J.
2004 “Cyborgs to Companion Species: Reconfiguring Kinship in Technoscience”, In The Haraway Reader, edited by Donna J. Haraway, 295–332. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2016 Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, Cynthia, and Robyn Thomas
2015 “Discourse in a Material World.” Journal of Management Studies 52(5): 680–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin
1996 Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, David
1998 “Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” In Research Strategies in the Social Sciences, edited by Elinor Scarbrough, and Eric Tanenbaum, 268–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howarth, David, and Jacob Torfing
eds. 2005 Discourse Theory in European Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Alan
2001 Sociology and the Environment. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan
2003 Hegemony: A Realist Analysis. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleese, Deborah
2002 “Contested Natures: Wolves in Late Modernity.” Society & Natural Resources 15(4): 313–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto
1990a “New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time.” In New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time, edited by Ernesto Laclau, 3–85. London: Verso.Google Scholar
ed. 1990b New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards A Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
1987 “Post-Marxism Without Apologies.” New Left Review I(166): 79–106.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno
2017 Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Lynn, William S.
2010 “Discourse and Wolves: Science, Society, and Ethics.” Society and Animals 181: 75–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marres, Noortje
2012 Material Participation. Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. III Behrens
1972 The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
Mellor, Mary
2000 “Feminism and Environmental Ethics: A Materialist Perspective.” Ethics and the Environment 5(1): 107–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petráček, Tomáš
2017 Power and Exploitation in the Czech Lands in the 10th–12th Centuries: A Central European Perspective. Leiden, Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robisch, S. K.
2009 Wolves and the Wolf Myth in American Literature. Reno, Las Vegas: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
Schou, Jannick
2016 “Ernesto Laclau and Critical Media Studies: Marxism, Capitalism, and Critique.” tripleC, 14(1): 292–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Liz, and Tim Richardson
2001 “Reflections on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis in Planning and Environmental Policy Research.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 3(3): 193–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle
2015 In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press/Meson Press.Google Scholar
Theodorakea, Ilektra Theodora, and Erica von Essen
2016 “Who Let the Wolves Out? Narratives, Rumors and Social Representations of the Wolf in Greece.” Environmental Sociology 2(1): 29–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torfing, Jacob
1999 New Theories of Discourse. Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Von Essen, Erica, Hans Peter Hansen, M. Nils Peterson, and Tarla R. Peterson
2018 “Discourses on Illegal Hunting in Sweden: The Meaning of Silence and Resistance.” Environmental Sociology 4(3): 370–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wise, Michael D.
2016 Producing Predators: Wolves, Work, and Conquest in the Northern Rockies. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos & Yannis Stavrakakis
2021. Moving discourse theory forward. Journal of Language and Politics 20:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.