Article published in:Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice
Edited by Benjamin De Cleen, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:1] 2021
► pp. 112–128
Doing justice to the agential material [*] *
A reflection on a non-hierarchical repositioning of the discursive and the material
Discourse theory has always paid explicit attention to the material dimension of social reality, with, for instance, the dislocation concept attributing an active role to the material. Still, it lacks attention for the specificity of the material-as-material, and tends to attribute a privileged position to the discursive as provider of meaning to these materials. This article argues that there is a need for a critical dialogue between discourse theory and new materialism, leading to the development of non-hierarchical approaches towards the discursive and the material realms. One particular approach, a model that is labelled the discursive-material knot, is proposed and developed in this article. This model expands the discourse-theoretical vocabulary so as to include bridging concepts such as invitation, investment and entextualisation. Moreover, it also allows for the development of new discursive-material research agendas, one of which, in relation to the environment and human-animal relations, is discussed.
Keywords: discourse theory, knot, new materialism, entanglement, dislocation, invitation, investment, entextualisation
- 2.Discourse theory’s relationship to the material component of social reality
- 3.Traces of the material and their limits
- 4.Dislocations, invitations and investments
- 5.Filling gaps and new agendas
- 6.In conclusion
Published online: 14 December 2020
Alexander, Richard J.
Barad, Karen, with Rick Dolphijn, and Iris van der Tuin
Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs
Carpentier, Nico, Benjamin De Cleen, and Leen Van Brussel
2019 “Introduction: Discourse Theory, Media and Communication, and the Work of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group.” In Communication and Discourse Theory: Collected works of the Brussels Discourse Theory Group, edited by Leen Van Brussel, Benjamin De Cleen, and Nico Carpentier, 3–31. Bristol, UK & Portland, OR, USA: Intellect.
Conty, Ariane F.
1996 The Geology of Morals. A Neo-Materialist Interpretation. Accessed 1 July 2020. http://www.t0.or.at/delanda/geology.htm
Dolphijn, Rick, and Iris van der Tuin
Dourish, Paul, and Melissa Mazmanian
2013 “Media as Material. Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organizational Practice.” How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies, edited by Paul R. Carlile, Davide Nicolini, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas, 92–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2008 “A (Brief) Critique of Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Analysis” 11 September. Accessed 1 July 2020. https://struggleswithphilosophy.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/a-brief-critique-of-laclau-and-mouffes-discourse-analysis/
Figari, Helene, and Skogen, Ketil
Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
Griggs, Steven, and David Howarth
Hajer, Maarten, and Wytske Versteeg
Haraway, Donna J.
Hardy, Cynthia, and Robyn Thomas
Howarth, David, and Jacob Torfing
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
Lynn, William S.
Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. III Behrens
Robisch, S. K.
Sharp, Liz, and Tim Richardson
Theodorakea, Ilektra Theodora, and Erica von Essen
Von Essen, Erica, Hans Peter Hansen, M. Nils Peterson, and Tarla R. Peterson
Cited by 1 other publications
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos & Yannis Stavrakakis
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.