Towards webs of equivalence and the political nomad in agonistic debate
Contributions from CDA and scales theory
Discourse theorists often defend their discursive stance on ‘reality’ and the material with reference to Laclau and Mouffe’s quote that, while an “earthquake or the falling of a brick…exist externally to thought,” they cannot “constitute themselves as objects outside any discursive conditions of emergence”.
While fully endorsing this statement, we argue that it does not licence discourse theorists to consider discursive formations divorced from their material context, but obliges us to account for the constraints and affordances of the material conditions on the structuring of the discursive field itself. Drawing on previous work, we argue that material conditions may render discourse systems incommensurate, such that they cannot be articulated through chains of equivalence within a radically restructured field. We suggest as a way forward the concept of the nomadic politician continually traversing between equivalential systems in order to reconfigure and renegotiate key signifiers within the materially-constrained discursive fields of each.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The return of the material
- 3.A case study: Discourse formations, materiality and incommensurability
- 4.Problems posed for the concept of agonism
- 5.A potential way forward: From chains of equivalence and the nomadic subject to the political nomad and networks of intension
- Notes
-
References
References
Anderson, Benedict
1983 Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso.

Bartlett, Tom
2019 “
Scaling the Incommensurate: Discourses of sustainability in the Western Isles of Scotland.” In
Critical Policy Discourse Analysis, edited by
Nicolina Montesano Montessori,
Jane Mulderrig and
Michael J. Farrelly, 242–263. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.


Bartlett, Tom
2017 “
Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Towards scalar supervenience?” In
Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by
Tom Bartlett and
Gerard O’Grady, 375–390. London and New York: Routledge.


Bartlett, Tom
2012 Hybrid Voices and Collaborative Change: Contextualising Positive Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.


Bartlett, Tom, Nicolina Montesano Montessori, and Harriet Lloyd
2017 “
Contesting Key Terms and Concepts in the Civil Sphere”. In
The Routledge Handbook of Language Awareness, edited by
Peter Garrett and
Josep Cots. London and New York: Routledge.


Blommaert, Jan
2015 “
Chronotopes, Scales, and Complexity in the Study of Language in Society.”
Annual Review of Anthropology 441: 105–116.


Blommaert, Jan
2007 “
Sociolinguistic Scales.”
Intercultural Pragmatics 4 (1): 1–19.


Brennan, Ruth
2015 What Lies Beneath: Probing the Cultural Depths of a Nature Conservation Conflict in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland. University of Aberdeen. Unpublished PhD Thesis.

Buell, Frederick
2012 “
A Short History of Oil Cultures: Or, the Marriage of Catastrophe and Exuberance.”
Journal of American Studies 461: 273–293.


Carpentier, Nico
2017 “
Discourse-Theoretical Analysis (DTA).” In
The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by
John Flowerdew and
John E. Richardson, 272–284. London and New York: Routledge.


Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari
1987 (trsl
B. Massumi) [1980]
A Thousand Plateaus. London, New York, Oxford, New Delhi and Sydney: Bloomsbury.

Errejón, Iñigon and Chantal Mouffe
2016 Podemos: In the Name of the People. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Fairclough, Norman
2010 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London and New York: Routledge.

FishUpdate
2013 “
Dismay at Barra Conservation Outcome”
14 July 2013
[URL]
Foucault, Michel
1971 L’ordre du disours. Paris: Gallimard.

Halcrow Group Limited
2010 Impact Assessment of the Proposed Designation of Two Inshore Special Areas of Conservation in the Sound of Barra and East Mingulay. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Available online from
[URL] [accessed 27 April 2015].
Harvey, David
1996 Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. London: Blackwell.

HIE
2014 Highlands and Islands Enterprise. The Outer Hebrides. Available online from
[URL] [accessed 27 April 2015].
Howarth, D.
1998 “
Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” In
Research Strategies in the Social Sciences, edited by
Elinor Scarborough and
Eric Tanenbaum, 268–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Laclau, Ernesto
2005 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.

Marine Scotland Communications
2014 “
Barra Step Forward for Community Management of SAC.”
February 20 2014
[URL]
Montesano Montessori, Nicolina
2011 “
The Design of a Theoretical, Methodological, Analytical Framework to Analyse Hegemony in Discourse.”
Critical Discourse Studies 8 (3): 169–182.


Mouffe, Chantal
2018 For a Left Populism. London: Verso.

Mouffe, Chantal
2014 “
Agonistic Democracy and Radical Politics.”
Pavillion [URL]
Mouffe, Chantal
2013 Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.

Mouffe, Chantal
1994 “
For a Politics of Nomadic Identity.” In
Travellers’ Tales, edited by
George Robertson et al., 105–113. London: Routledge.

Scottish Natural Heritage
n.d. “
Protecting Scotland’s Nature: Protected Areas”.
[URL]
Thibault, Paul J.
1997 Re-Reading Saussure: The Dynamics of Signs in Social Life. London and New York: Routledge.

Tomasello, Michael
2003 Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

Torfing, Jacob
1999 New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell.

Whitehead, Alfred North
1978 (1929) Process and Reality. New York: The Free Press.

Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos & Yannis Stavrakakis
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.