Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse Theory: Ways forward for theory development and research practice
Edited by Benjamin De Cleen, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Yannis Stavrakakis and Ilija Tomanić Trivundža
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:1] 2021
► pp. 162–177

The (discursive) limits of (left) populism

ORCID logo | Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

As far as the study of (left) populism is concerned, Political Discourse Theory has been largely associated with a novel and challenging take on populist politics, first emerging in Laclau’s work in the 1970s and preoccupying Laclau, Mouffe and their co-travellers continuously since then. What has not been adequately articulated yet is what would be the limits of (left) populism as a political strategy from a discursive perspective. This short paper aims at remedying this lacuna in the relevant literature indicating certain ways forward for the discursive analysis of populism. The argument operates both at a theoretical and conceptual level as well as at the level of historical, empirical analysis.

Keywords: populism, discourse, limits, democracy, sovereignty, power, nationalism, leadership, left
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discursive fluidity in political antagonism: When the left is not populist enough
  • 3.The limits of populism in government
  • 4.Populism’s inherent limit?
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 16 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20047.sta
References
Anria, Santiago, and Kenneth M. Roberts
2019 “Bolivia After Morales: What Lies in Store for the Country?.” Foreign Affairs, [URL] (accessed 23 December 2019).
Bahiana, Maria
2019 “Transformamos pobres em consumidores e não em cidadãos, diz Mujica.” BBC News Brasil, [URL] (accessed 23 December 2019).
Barthes, Roland
2012 Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy
2003 Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanchet, Reginald
2019 Politics of the Psychoanalyst. Athens: Ekkremes (in Greek).Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin
2004 Post-Democracy. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin, and Yannis Stavrakakis
2017 “Distinctions and Articulations: Discourse Theory and the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost – The Public 24 (4): 301–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst
1997 The King’s Two Bodies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto
1977 Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: NLR Books.Google Scholar
2005 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
2014 The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lefort, Claude
1988 Democracy and Political Theory. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
McCormick, John
2019 “Machiavelli’s Camillus and the Tension Between Leadership and Democracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities, edited by Simon Stern, Maksymilian Del Mar, and Bernadette Meyler, 409–427. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosquera, Martin
2019 “The Day After Macri’s Downfall.” Jacobin 22 September 2019, [URL] (accessed 23 December 2019).
Mudde, Cas, and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser
2017 Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner
2016 What is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santner, Eric
2011 The Royal Remains: The People’s Two Bodies and the Endgames of Sovereignty. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siniosoglou, Nikitas
2018 Black Wills. Athens: Kichli (in Greek).Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis
1999 Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2016 “State and Event in the Greek Crisis: 2015 Revisited.” In Badiou & the State, edited by Dominik Finkelde 85–106. Baden-Baden/London: Nomos/Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2017a “How did ‘Populism’ Become a Pejorative Concept? And Why is this Important Today? A Genealogy of Double Hermeneutics.” POPULISMUS working paper 61, [URL] (accessed 23 December 2019).
2017b “Discourse Theory in Populism Research: Three Challenges and a Dilemma.” Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 523–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Giorgos Katsambekis
2014 “Left-wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA.” Journal of Political Ideologies 19 (2): 119–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis, Giorgos Katsambekis, Thomas Siomos, and Nikos Nikisianis
2016 “Contemporary Left-wing Populism in Latin America: Leadership, Horizontalism, and Post-democracy in Chávez’s Venezuela.” Latin American Politics and Society 58 (3): 51–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis, Giorgos Katsambekis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis, Thomas Siomos, and Nikos Nikisianis
2017 “Extreme Right-wing Populism in Europe: Revisiting a Reified Association.” Critical Discourse Studies 14 (4): 420–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Anton Jäger
2018 “Accomplishments and Limitations of the ‘New’ Mainstream in Contemporary Populism Studies.” European Journal of Social Theory 21(4): 547–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Touraine, Alain
1994 “Democracy.” Thesis Eleven 381: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia
2018 “Political Theory of Populism.” Annual Review of Political Science 191. [URL] (accessed 23 December 2019) DOI logo
Wolin, Sheldon
2008 Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos & Yannis Stavrakakis
2021. Moving discourse theory forward. Journal of Language and Politics 20:1 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.