Discourse, concepts, ideologies
Pausing for thought
Two branches of discourse studies, critical discourse analysis (CDA) and discourse theory (DT), could benefit through extending their critical focus and incorporating findings and methodologies of neighbouring disciplines. While indebted to the attentiveness of CDA to ordinary language, ideology studies have by contrast developed interpretative, non-judgmental analytical frameworks that explore the many-faceted features of ideology, power, and the political. In turn, the macro-focus of DT on binary distinctions, articulatory equivalences, and the construction of hegemony through empty signifiers, overlooks the complex internal conceptual morphology that produces multiple ideological vocabularies. Through a layered filtering of texts, utterances, and linguistic intensities, ideological micro-morphology reveals processes of semantic decontestation in order to defend, alter or criticize political thought-practices. It illuminates the complex interrelationship between word and concept and accepts fantasies as ineluctable and decodable features of communal life. By reaching out beyond their disciplinary confines, the interplay of these parallel approaches could enrich the scholarly understanding of the political.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Beyond the pejorative
- 3.Re-engaging with the political
- 4.The grip of Laclau
- 5.Narrowing the divides
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References
Carpentier, Nico, and Benjamin De Cleen
Collier, David, Fernando Daniel Hidalgo, and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu
2006 “
Essentially Contested Concepts: Debates and Applications.”
Journal of Political Ideologies 111: 211–235.


d’Ancona, Matthew
2017 Post Truth. London: Ebury Press.

Fairclough, Norman
2001 Language and Power, 2nd edn. Harlow, UK: Longman.

Flinders, Matthew, and Matt Wood
2018 “
Discursive Depoliticisation and Political Disengagement.” In
The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, edited by
Ruth Wodak and
Bernhard Forchtner, 603–617. London and New York: Routledge.

Freeden, Michael
1996 Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Freeden, Michael
2003 Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Freeden, Michael
2012 “
The Professional Responsibilities of the Political Theorist.” In
Liberalism as Ideology: Essays in Honour of Michael Freeden, edited by
Ben Jackson and
Marc Stears, 259–277. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Freeden, Michael
2013 The Political Theory of Political Thinking: The Anatomy of a Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Freeden, Michael
2021 “
Ideologiekritik – A Critique.” In
Postcolonial Texts and Contexts, edited by
Katja Sarkowsky &
Mark Stein, 15–29. Leiden: Brill.

Freeden, Michael, Lyman Tower Sargent, and Marc Stears
eds. 2013 The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Freeden, Michael, Javier Fernández-Sebastián, and Jörn Leonhard
eds. 2019 In Search of European Liberalisms: Concepts, Languages, Ideologies. Berghahn: New York and Oxford.


Geuss, Raymond
1981 The Idea of a Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Glynos, Jason
2001 “
The Grip of Ideology: a Lacanian Approach to the Theory of Ideology.”
Journal of Political Ideologies 61: 191–214.


Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth
2007 Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.


Glynos, Jason, Robin Klimecki, and Hugh Willmott
2015 “
Logics in Policy and Practice: A Critical Nodal Analysis of the UK Banking Reform Process.”
Critical Policy Studies 9(4): 393–415.


Horkheimer, Max, and Theodor W. Adorno
2002 Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.


Howarth, David
ed. 2015 Ernesto Laclau: Post-Marxism, Populism and Critique. London and New York: Routledge.

Laclau, Ernesto
1990 New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.

Laclau, Ernesto
2005 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.

Laycock, David
ed. 2019 Political Ideology in Parties, Policy, and Civil Society: Interdisciplinary Insights. Vancouver: UBC Press.

Martínez Rivas, Rafael, and Irene Lanzas Zotes
2020 “
Tres Approximaciones Teóricas a Los Discursos Polítocos: Concepto, Significante y Argumento.”
Revista de Estudios Politicos 1881: 41–69.


Therborn, Göran
1980 The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology. London: Verso.

Thompson, Martyn P.
1993 “
Reception Theory and the Interpretation of Historical Meanings.”
History and Theory 321: 248–272.


Trencsényi, Balázs, Michal Kopeček, Luka Lisjak Gabrijelčič, Maria Falina, Mónika Baár, and Maciej Janowski
2018 A History of Modern Political Thought in East Central Europe, vol. II1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van Dijk, Teun A.
1997 Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage.

Wodak, Ruth
2015 The Politics of Fear. London: Sage.

Wodak, Ruth, and Bernhard Forchtner
eds. 2018 The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
eds. 2009 Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd revised edition). London: Sage.

Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
De Cleen, Benjamin, Jana Goyvaerts, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos & Yannis Stavrakakis
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.