Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 21:6 (2022) ► pp.867–889

Framing the political conflict discourse in Chinese media

A case study of Sino-US trade dispute

ORCID logo | Sun Yat-sen University

Individuals perceive the real world via interpretive schema, and actively classify and interpret their life experiences into what are defined as frames, to make sense of the world around them. Why certain frames are chosen can be explored from the cognitive and communicative perspective. In this light, this study explores how the Chinese news media frame the coverage on Sino-US trade dispute, discursively legitimizing their ideological stance and action. The case study demonstrates that Chinese media exploit multifarious frames to construct the Chinese national identity, which correspondingly and strategically highlight such frames (Cooperation, Health, Journey) as conform to culture value or render the audience empathy. It is suggested to construct political conflict discourse via strategic choices of appropriate social, moral or cultural frames to reframe the dispute. Chinese media can also deploy agenda-setting to enhance political communication.

Keywords: frames, critical discourse analysis, cognitive linguistics, Sino-US trade dispute, communication
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Framing theory
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Framing Sino-US trade dispute
    • 4.1Thematic analysis
    • 4.2Surface frames
    • 4.3Deep frames and national identity
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 14 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21005.zhu
References
Cacciatore, Michael A., Dietram A. Scheufele, and Shanto Iyengar
2016 “The End of Framing as we Know it … and the Future of Media Effects.” Mass Communication and Society 19 (1): 7–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Jiyong
2018 “The Background, Causes, Essence and Chinese Countermeasures of the Sino-US Trade War.” Journal of Wuhan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Ed) 71 (5): 72–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ding, Jianxin, and Wenjing Shen
2013 “Marginal Discourse Analysis: Some Basic Theoretical Issue.” Foreign Languages and Foreign Language Teaching (4):17–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert
1993 “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fatma, Ayesha, and Nalin Bharti
2019 “Perception vs. Reality: Understanding the US-China trade war.” Transnational Corporations Review 11 (4): 270–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
1995 Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela and Norman Fairclough
2012 Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferree, Marx, William Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards, and Dieter Rucht
2002 Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1985 “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica [Semantics Notebook] 6 (2): 222–254. [URL]
Fillmore, Charles, Christopher Johnson, and Mariam R. L. Petruck
2003 “Background to FrameNet.” International Journal of Lexicography 16 (3): 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Roger
1991 Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gamson, William, and Andre Modigliani
1987 “The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action.” In Research in Political Sociology Vol.31, ed. by Richard Braungart, 137–177. Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
Gitlin, Todd
1980 The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Iqbal, Badar, Nida Rahman, and Jonathan Eliminian
2019 “The Future of Global Trade in the Presence of the Sino-US Trade War.” Economic and Political Studies 7 (2): 217–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Adam Simon
1993 “News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion: A Study of Agenda-setting, Priming and Framing.” Communication Research 20 (3): 365–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky
1981 “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 2111: 453–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39 (4): 341–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sei-Hill, Dietram A. Scheufele, and James Shanahan
2002 “Think About it this Way: Attribute Agenda-setting Function of the Press and the Public’s Evaluation of a Local Issue.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79 (1): 7–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2010 The Discursive Construction of European Identities: A Multi-level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt, Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
2004 Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
2006 Whose Freedom: The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2006.Google Scholar
2008 The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21st Century Politics With an 18th Century Brain. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. I: Theoretical Pre- requisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McQuail, Denis
2005 Mass Communication Theory (5th ed.). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Mikheev, Vasily, and Sergey Lukonin
2019 “China–USA: Multiple Vector of “Trade War”.” Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia [Modern Economic Stability] 63(5): 57–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Price, Vincent, David Tewksbury, and Elizabeth Powers
1997 “Switching Trains of Thought: The Impact of News Frames on Readers’ Cognitive Responses.” Communication Research 24 (5): 481–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, John
2007 Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Trintje Pasma
2010 A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1988 News as Discourse. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1991 Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vani, Archana
2020 “Who Will Win from the Trade War? Analysis of the US–China Trade War from a Micro Perspective.” China Economic Journal 13 (3): 376–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, Paul
1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2009a The Discourse of Politics in Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2009b “Language and Politics.” In English Language: Description, Variation and Context, ed. by Jonathan J. Culpeper, Francis Katamba, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak and Tony McEnery, 713–734. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Suisheng
2019 “Engagement on the Defensive: From the Mismatched Grand Bargain to the Emerging US-China Rivalry.” Journal of Contemporary China 281: 501–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Chunman, and Xiaoyu Pu
2019 “Introduction: Can America and China Escape the Thucydides Trap?” Journal of Chinese Political Science 24 (1):1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar