Since Hong Kong’s handover to China, British newspapers still play an active role in constructing Britain’s connections with its former colony. This study elaborates a schema for protests to help better understand protests in general. Based on this schema, the study examined representations of the 2019–20 protests in British newspapers using the approach of corpus-assisted critical discourse studies. The analysis shows that they mainly used the predicational strategy, and emphasized the Chinese government’s control of Hong Kong – including the inabilities of the Hong Kong government and police violence – in contrast with the protestors’ demands for universal suffrage. They suggested that Britain act as a mediator to shoulder a moral responsibility over Hong Kong. Their attitudes are interpreted with regard to Britain’s foreign policies and the dominant ideology cultivated in its historical, socio-political contexts and suggest that the UK journalistic practice regarding Hong Kong issues is political-driven to a great extent.
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michał Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273–306.
Campbell, Donald T.1965. “Ethnocentric and Other Altruistic Motives.” In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, ed. by David Levine, 283–301. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Chan, Wayne W. L.2015. “The Media Representations of Police Image: Research Notes on the Hong Kong Occupy Movement.” Sage Open.
Chan, Rami Hin-Yeung. 2016. “Why Crises Matter: Crisis-provoking Politics and State–society Interactions in Post-1997 Hong Kong.” China: An International Journal 14 (4): 22–45.
Cohen, Bernard C.1963. The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Entman, Robert M.1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
Fairclough, Norman. 2005. “Critical Discourse Analysis in Transdisciplinary Research.” In A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinary, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Paul Chilton, 53–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Flowerdew, John. 2012. Critical Discourse Analysis in Historiography: The Case of Hong Kong’s Evolving Political Identity. London: Palgrave.
Fung, Chi Keung Charles, and Chi Shun Fong. 2019. “Going out under the Shadow of Rred China: The Geopolitical Origin of Hong Kong’s International Status.” Asian Education and Development Studies 8 (2): 173–185.
Ho, Janet. 2019. “‘Sensible Protesters Began Leaving the Protests’: A Comparative Study of Opposing Voices in the Hong Kong Political Movement.” Language and Communication 641: 12–24.
Hunston, Susan. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Chin-Chuan, Joseph M. Chan, and Zhongdang Pan. 2002. Global Media Spectacle: News War Over Hong Kong. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Liu, Ming, and Cong Jiang. 2019. “Constant Fear, But Lingering Nostalgia: British Press Representations of Post-colonial Hong Kong 20 Years on.” Discourse and Communication 13 (6): 630–646.
Mark, Chi-Kwan. 2014. “Development without Decolonisation? Hong Kong’s Future and Relations with Britain and China, 1967–1972.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 24 (2): 315–335.
Mark, Chi-Kwan. 2015. “To ‘Educate’ Deng Xiaoping in Capitalism: Thatcher’s Visit to China and the Future of Hong Kong in 1982.” Cold War History 17 (2): 161–180.
Partington, Alan. 2004. “Corpora and Discourse, a Most Congruous Beast.” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.
Partington, Alan. 2015. “Corpus-assisted Comparative Case Studies of Representations of the Arab World.” In Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora, ed. by Paul Baker and Tony McEnery, 220–243. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Purbrick, Martin. 2019. “A Report of the 2019 Hong Kong Protests.” Asian Affairs 50 (4): 465–487.
Qin, Amy. 2019. “Hong Kong Protesters Clash with Police inside Shopping Mall.” The New York Times, July 14, 2019. [URL]
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Discourse-historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michal Meyer, 87–121. London: Routledge.
Steele, Claude M., Steven J. Spencer, and Joshua Aronson. 2002. “Contending with Group Image: The Psychology of Stereotype and Social Identity Threat.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 341: 379–440.
Soroka, Stuart N.2003. “Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8(1), 27–48.
Tajfel, Henry, and John C. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, ed. by Worchel, Stephen and William G. Austin, 33–47. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Thussu, Daya K.2002. “Legitimizing ‘Humanitarian Intervention’? CNN, NATO and the Kosovo Crisis.” European Journal of Communication 15(3), 345–361.
Van Dijk, Teun A.2009. “News, Discourse, and Ideology.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, ed. by Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin and Thomas Hanitzsch, 191–204. London: Routledge.
Veneti, Anastasia, Achilleas Karadimitriou, and Stamatis Poulakidakos. 2016. “Media Ecology and the Politics of Dissent: Representations of the Hong Kong Protests in The Guardian and China Daily.” Social Media and Society, 2(3), 1–13.
Wang, Guofeng. 2017. “Discursive Construction of Territorial Disputes: Foreign Newspaper Reporting on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Dispute.” Social Semiotics 27(5), 567–585.
Wang, Guofeng. 2018. “A Corpus-assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reporting on China’s Air Pollution in the Official Chinese English-language Press.” Discourse & Communication 12(6): 645–662.
2022. Worthiness, unity, numbers and commitment: Strengthening qualitative corpus methods in the critical discourse analysis of protest press coverage. Discourse & Society 33:5 ► pp. 611 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.