Focusing on the anti-extradition bill protests in Hong Kong, this article presents an analysis of Twitter posts adopting the hashtags #antiELAB, #NoChinaExtradition and #HongKongProtests. The analysis explores the public narrative among the collective identity of Hongkongers opposing the extradition bill as events unfolded during mid-2019 in Hong Kong. To do so, we adopt Bhatia’s (2015) multi-perspective framework for the Discourse of Illusion, which takes a three-prong approach to the study of argument construction and establishing legitimacy. Specifically, through the interrelated components of (1) historicity, (2) linguistic and semiotic action, and (3) social impact, the dimensions of the hashtag narrative that emerged on Twitter were explored.
2016AntConc (Version 3.4.4) [Computer software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. [URL]
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bennett, Lance W., and Alexandra Segerberg
2012 “The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 739–768.
Bhatia, Aditi
2015Discursive Illusions in Public Discourse: Theory and Practice. London & New York: Routledge.
Bhatia, Aditi
2018 “Digital Narratives of Struggle and Legitimacy in the Arab Spring”. In Participatory Digital Cultures and Contemporary Discourses of (De)Legitimization, eds. by Damian Rivers, and Andrew Ross, 150–168. New York: Routledge.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1990The Logic of Practice. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Breuer, Anita, Todd Landman, and Dorothea Farquhar
2015 “Social Media and Protest Mobilization: Evidence from the Tunisian Revolution.” Democratization 22 (4): 764–792.
Carfantan, Serge
2003 “Philosophy and Spirituality.” Available at: [URL]
Chan, Athena, and Rachel Yeo
2019 “How extradition bill protests have united locals and ethnic minorities in Hong Kong.” South China Morning Post, July 6, 2019. [URL]
Cialdini, Robert B.
1997 “Interpersonal Influence.” In Psychological Insights and Perspectives, ed. by Sharon, Shavitt, and Timothy C. Brock, 195–217. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Vittorio Tantucci
2021 “The Principle of (Im) politeness Reciprocity.” Journal of Pragmatics 1751 (2021): 146–164.
Ekström, Mats, and Adam Shehata
2018 “Social Media, Porous Boundaries, and the Development of Online Political Engagement Among Young Citizens.” New Media & Society 20 (2): 740–759.
Freelon, Deen, Charlton D. McIlwain, and Meredith Clark
2016Beyond the Hashtags: #Ferguson, #BlackLivesMatter, and the Online Struggle for Offline Justice. Center for Media and Social Impact, School of Communication, American University, Washington, DC. Available at: [URL]
Gil de Zúñiga, Homero, Logan Molyneux, and Pei Zheng
2014 “Social media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships.” Journal of Communication 64 (4): 612–634.
Guo, Chao, and Gregory D. Saxton
2014 “Tweeting Social Change: How Social Media Are Changing Nonprofit Advocacy.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 (1): 57–79.
Hands, Joss
2011@ is for Activism: Dissent, Resistance and Rebellion in a Digital Culture. London: Pluto Press.
Hansson, Sten
2018 “The Discursive Micro-Politics of Blame Avoidance: Unpacking the Language of Government Blame Games.” Policy Sciences 51 (4): 545–564.
Hong, Sounman, and Sun Hyoung Kim
2016 “Political Polarization on Twitter: Implications for the Use of Social Media in Digital Governments.” Government Information Quarterly 33 (4): 777–782.
Jackson, Sarah J., and Brooke Foucault Welles
2015 “Hijacking# myNYPD: Social media Dissent and Networked Counterpublics.” Journal of Communication 65 (6): 932–952.
Jayyusi, Lena
1984Categorization and the Moral Order. Boston, MA: Routledge and Keegan Paul.
Laikwan, Pang
2020 “Identity Politics and Democracy in Hong Kong’s Social Unrest.” Feminist Studies 46 (1): 206–215.
Lazar, Anita, and Michelle M. Lazar
2004 “The Discourse of the New World Order: ‘Out-casting’ the Double Face of Threat.” Discourse & Society 15 (2–3): 223–242.
Leudar, Ivan, Victoria Marsland and Jiří Nekvapil
2004 “On Membership Categorization: ‘Us’, ‘Them’ and ‘Doing violence’ in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 15 (2–3): 243–266.
Leudar, Ivan, and Jiří Nekvapil
2011 “Practical Historians and Adversaries: 9/11 revisited.” Discourse & Society 22 (1): 66–85.
Matuszewski, Paweł, and Gabriella Szabó
2019 “Are Echo Chambers Based on Partisanship? Twitter and Political Polarity in Poland and Hungary.” Social Media+ Society 5 (2): 2056305119837671.
Melucci, Alberto
1995 “The Process of Collective Identity.” In Social Movements and Culture ed. by Johnston, Hank, and Bert Klandermans, 41–63. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Miller, Vincent
2017 “Phatic Culture and the Status Quo: Reconsidering the Purpose of Social Media Activism.” Convergence 23 (3), 251–269.
Papacharissi, Zizi
2010A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Polity Press.
Penney, Joel, and Caroline Dadas
2014 “(Re)Tweeting in the Service of Protest: Digital Composition and Circulation in the Occupy Wall Street movement.” New Media & Society 16 (1): 74–90.
Perloff, Richard M.
1993The Dynamics of Persuasion, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sarangi, Srikant, and Christopher Candlin
2003 “Categorization and Explanation of Risk: A Discourse Analytical Perspective.” Health, Risk & Society 5 (2): 115–124.
Simon, Roger
1999Gramsci’s Political Thought: An Introduction. London: The Electric Book Company Ltd.
Tam, Luisa
2019 “Carrie Lam’s Clumsy Parenting Analogy Was Designed to Take Sting Out of Extradition Bill Protests, but Only Burns Relations with Hong Kong Mothers.” South China Morning Post, June 17, 2019. [URL]
Tomasello, Michael, and Henrike Moll
2010 “The gap is social: Human shared intentionality and culture.” In Mind the gap ed. by Kalppeler, Peter M. and Silk, Joan, 331–349. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Vukovich, Daniel
2020 “A Sound and Fury Signifying Mediatisation: On the Hong Kong Protests, 2019.” Javnost – The Public 27 (2): 200–209.
Wallaschek, Stefan
2020 “The Discursive Construction of Solidarity: Analysing Public Claims in Europe’s Migration Crisis.” Political Studies 68 (1): 74–92.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, and Martin Reisigl
1999 “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society 10 (2): 149–173.
Xenos, Michael, Ariadne Vromen, and Brian D. Loader
2014 “The Great Equalizer? Patterns of Social Media Use and Youth Political Engagement in Three Advanced Democracies.” Information, Communication & Society 17 (2): 151–167.
Yang, Guobin
2016 “Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of# BlackLivesMatter.” Media and Communication 4 (4): 13–17.
Ying, Pei
2014 “Hong Kong’s Identity Crisis.” The Diplomat, November 1, 2014. [URL]
Cited by (5)
Cited by 5 other publications
Al Zidjaly, Najma
2024. Stance and food activism on Arabic Twitter (X): a multimodal analysis. Multimodal Communication 13:2 ► pp. 97 ff.
2024. Hong Kong’s new normal: Remaking authorized discourses of “special administration,” 2017–2022. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
Aboh, Sopuruchi Christian
2023. ‘It will never be well with SARS’: A discourse analytic study of the #EndSARS protests on social media. Discourse & Society
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.