Article published in:
Discourses of Fake NewsEdited by Scott Wright
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:5] 2021
► pp. 803–823
Fighting an indestructible monster
Journalism’s legitimacy narratives during the Trump Era
Juliane A. Lischka | Universität Hamburg
U.S. journalism during the Trump era has experienced numerous legitimacy attacks by the leading political figure. Building on the concepts of institutional legitimacy and intentional trust, this study analyzes legitimation narratives in projections of journalism’s future, using the Harvard University’s NiemanLab Predictions of Journalism from 2017 to 2021. Projectory narratives are meaningful constructions of a field’s future and provide guidance for its actors. The qualitative analysis of a Trump-related subset of predictions (ca. n = 130) convey (1) confrontational narratives of threat, self-reproach, and epistemological authority loss. Confrontational narratives serve to secure consent for suggested transparency and audience relationship building solutions. These (2) solution narratives represent trustification strategies. Lastly, (3) survival narratives aim at regaining authority and agency through legacy mythopoesis and the construction of a cautiously optimistic post-Trump outlook for journalism. Hence, the analysis of projectory narratives reveals how an organizational field collectively prepares for change to regain legitimacy.
Keywords: digital journalism, discourse, disinformation, fake news, future, legitimacy, politics, renewal, Trump, truth
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Legitimacy
- 2.2Journalism legitimacy
- 2.3Discursive legitimacy signaling
- 3.Method
- 3.1Case selection
- 3.2Material selection
- 3.3Analysis
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Confrontation
- 4.2Solution
- 4.3Survival
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Note
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 07 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21031.lis
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21031.lis
References
Andrew, Blake C.
Bitektine, Alex, and Patrick Haack
Burrowes, Carl Patrick
Carlson, Matt
Carlson, Matt, Sue Robinson, and Seth C. Lewis
Corbin, Juliet M., and Anselm L. Strauss
DiMaggio, Paul J.
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell
Domke, D., Mark D. Watts, D. V. Shah, and D. P. Fan
Egelhofer, Jana Laura, Loes Aaldering, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Sebastian Galyga, and Sophie Lecheler
Gills, Barry, Heikki Patomäki, and Jamie Morgan
Hallin, Daniel C.
Hamilton, James T.
Hanitzsch, Thomas
Hanitzsch, Thomas, and Tim P. Vos
Jackson, Jonathan, and Jacinta M. Gau
Karlsson, Michael, and Christer Clerwall
Koliska, Michael, Kalyani Chadha, and Alison Burns
Korkeamäki, Lauri, and Marko Kohtamäki
Ladd, Jonathan M.
Landau, Dana, Israel Drori, and Siri Terjesen
Lee, Taeku, and Christian Hosam
Lischka, Juliane A.
Messeri, Lisa, and Janet Vertesi
Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan
Munger, Kevin
Myllylahti, Merja
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis
Perdomo, Gabriela, and Philippe Rodrigues-Rouleau
Picard, Robert G.
Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
Ruotsalainen, Juho
Said, Edward W.
Shin, Wooyeol, Changwook Kim, and Jaewon Joo
Strauss, Anselm L., and Juliet M. Corbin
Suchman, Mark C.
Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti, and Tine Ustad Figenschou
Tong, Jingrong
Vaara, Eero, and Janne Tienari
Vaara, Eero, Janne Tienari, and Juha Laurila
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
Wagemans, Andrea, Tamara Witschge, and Frank Harbers
Waisbord, Silvio, and Adriana Amado
Watts, Mark D., D. Domke, Dhavan V. Shah, and David P. Fan
Whipple, Kelsey N., and Jeremy L. Shermak
Wodak, Ruth, Majid Khosravinik, and Brigitte Mral