Article published In:
Discourses of Fake NewsEdited by Scott Wright
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:5] 2021
► pp. 803–823
Edited by Scott Wright
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:5] 2021
► pp. 803–823
Fighting an indestructible monster
Journalism’s legitimacy narratives during the Trump Era
U.S. journalism during the Trump era has experienced numerous legitimacy attacks by the leading political figure. Building on the concepts of institutional legitimacy and intentional trust, this study analyzes legitimation narratives in projections of journalism’s future, using the Harvard University’s NiemanLab Predictions of Journalism from 2017 to 2021. Projectory narratives are meaningful constructions of a field’s future and provide guidance for its actors. The qualitative analysis of a Trump-related subset of predictions (ca. n = 130) convey (1) confrontational narratives of threat, self-reproach, and epistemological authority loss. Confrontational narratives serve to secure consent for suggested transparency and audience relationship building solutions. These (2) solution narratives represent trustification strategies. Lastly, (3) survival narratives aim at regaining authority and agency through legacy mythopoesis and the construction of a cautiously optimistic post-Trump outlook for journalism. Hence, the analysis of projectory narratives reveals how an organizational field collectively prepares for change to regain legitimacy.
Keywords: digital journalism, discourse, disinformation, fake news, future, legitimacy, politics, renewal, Trump, truth
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Legitimacy
- 2.2Journalism legitimacy
- 2.3Discursive legitimacy signaling
- 3.Method
- 3.1Case selection
- 3.2Material selection
- 3.3Analysis
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Confrontation
- 4.2Solution
- 4.3Survival
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Note
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References
Andrew, Blake C.
2007 “Media-Generated Shortcuts: Do Newspaper Headlines Present Another Roadblock for Low-Information Rationality?” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12 (2): 24–43. 
Bitektine, Alex, and Patrick Haack
2015 “The “Macro” and the “Micro” of Legitimacy: Toward a Multilevel Theory of the Legitimacy Process.” Academy of Management Review 40 (1): 49–75.
Broersma, Marcel
2019 “The Legitimacy Paradox.” Journalism 20 (1): 92–94.
Burrowes, Carl Patrick
2011 “Property, Power and Press Freedom: Emergence of the Fourth Estate, 1640–1789.” Journalism & Communication Monographs 13 (1): 2–66.
Carlson, Matt
2016 “Metajournalistic Discourse and the Meanings of Journalism: Definitional Control, Boundary Work, and Legitimation.” Commun Theor 26 (4): 349–68.
Carlson, Matt, Sue Robinson, and Seth C. Lewis
2020 “Digital Press Criticism: The Symbolic Dimensions of Donald Trump’s Assault on U.S. Journalists as the “Enemy of the People”.” Digital Journalism, 1–18.
Corbin, Juliet M., and Anselm L. Strauss
2008 Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
DiMaggio, Paul J.
1988 “Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory.” In Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, edited by Lynne G. Zucker. 3–21. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell
1983 “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–60.
Domke, D., Mark D. Watts, D. V. Shah, and D. P. Fan
1999 “The Politics of Conservative Elites and the ‘Liberal Media’ Argument.” J Commun 49 (4): 35–58.
Egelhofer, Jana Laura, Loes Aaldering, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Sebastian Galyga, and Sophie Lecheler
2020 “From Novelty to Normalization? How Journalists Use the Term “Fake News” in Their Reporting.” Journalism Stud. 21 (10): 1323–43.
Foucault, Michel
1977 The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Gills, Barry, Heikki Patomäki, and Jamie Morgan
2019 “President Trump as Status Dysfunction.” Organization 26 (2): 291–301.
Hallin, Daniel C.
2019 “Mediatisation, Neoliberalism and Populisms: The Case of Trump.” Contemporary Social Science 14 (1): 14–25.
Hamilton, James T.
2004 All the News That’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hanitzsch, Thomas
2007 “Deconstructing Journalism Culture: Toward a Universal Theory.” Commun Theor 17 (4): 367–85.
Hanitzsch, Thomas, and Tim P. Vos
2017 “Journalistic Roles and the Struggle over Institutional Identity: The Discursive Constitution of Journalism.” Commun Theor 27 (2): 115–35.
Jackson, Jonathan, and Jacinta M. Gau
2016 “Carving up Concepts? Differentiating Between Trust and Legitimacy in Public Attitudes Towards Legal Authority.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust, edited by Ellie Shockley, Tess M. Neal, Lisa M. PytlikZillig, and Brian H. Bornstein. 49–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Karlsson, Michael, and Christer Clerwall
2019 “Cornerstones in Journalism.” Journalism Stud. 20 (8): 1184–99.
Kim, Sora, and Scott Rader
2010 “What They Can Do Versus How Much They Care.” JCOM 14 (1): 59–80.
Koliska, Michael, Kalyani Chadha, and Alison Burns
2020 “Talking Back: Journalists Defending Attacks Against Their Profession in the Trump Era.” Journalism Studies 35 (2): 1–18.
Korkeamäki, Lauri, and Marko Kohtamäki
2020 “To Outcomes and Beyond: Discursively Managing Legitimacy Struggles in Outcome Business Models.” Industrial Marketing Management 911:196–208.
Kreis, Ramona
Ladd, Jonathan M.
2012 Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Landau, Dana, Israel Drori, and Siri Terjesen
2014 “Multiple Legitimacy Narratives and Planned Organizational Change.” Human Relations 67 (11): 1321–45.
Lee, Taeku, and Christian Hosam
2020 “Fake News Is Real: The Significance and Sources of Disbelief in Mainstream Media in Trump’s America.” Sociol Forum 35 (S1): 996–1018.
Lischka, Juliane A.
2019 “A Badge of Honor? How the New York Times Discredits President Trump’s Fake News Accusations.” Journalism Studies 20 (2): 287–304.
2020 “Fluid Institutional Logics in Digital Journalism.” Journal of Media Business Studies 17 (2): 113–31.
Maurer, John G.
1971 Readings in Organization Theory: Open-System Approaches: Random House (NY).
Messeri, Lisa, and Janet Vertesi
2015 “The Greatest Missions Never Flown: Anticipatory Discourse and the “Projectory” in Technological Communities.” Technology and Culture 56 (1): 54–85.
Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan
1977 “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” The American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–63.
Munger, Kevin
2020 “All the News That’s Fit to Click: The Economics of Clickbait Media.” Political Communication 37 (3): 376–97.
Myllylahti, Merja
2020 “Paying Attention to Attention: A Conceptual Framework for Studying News Reader Revenue Models Related to Platforms.” Digital Journalism 8 (5): 567–75.
Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis
2017 “The One Thing Journalism Just Might Do for Democracy.” Journalism Studies 18 (10): 1251–62.
Perdomo, Gabriela, and Philippe Rodrigues-Rouleau
2021 “Transparency as Metajournalistic Performance: The New York Times’ Caliphate Podcast and New Ways to Claim Journalistic Authority.” Journalism.
Picard, Robert G.
2004 “Commercialism and Newspaper Quality.” Newspaper Research Journal 25 (1): 54–65.
Ross, Andrew S., and Damian J. Rivers
2018 “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of “Fake News” and the Spread of Mis- and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” Social Media + Society 4 (2): 1–12.
Ruotsalainen, Juho
2018 “Scanning the Shape of Journalism – Emerging Trends, Changing Culture?” Futures 1041:14–24.
Said, Edward W.
1986 “Foucault and the Imagination of Power.” In Foucault: A Critical Reader, edited by Edward W. Said and David C. Hoy. 149–55. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shin, Wooyeol, Changwook Kim, and Jaewon Joo
2020 “Hating Journalism: Anti-Press Discourse and Negative Emotions Toward Journalism in Korea.” Journalism, 146488492098572.
Strauss, Anselm L., and Juliet M. Corbin
1990 Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Suchman, Mark C.
1995 “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610.
Thorbjørnsrud, Kjersti, and Tine Ustad Figenschou
2020 “The Alarmed Citizen: Fear, Mistrust, and Alternative Media.” Journalism Practice, 1–18.
Tong, Jingrong
2018 “Journalistic Legitimacy Revisited: Collapse or Revival in the Digital Age?” Digital Journalism 6 (2): 256–73.
Vaara, Eero, and Janne Tienari
2011 “On the Narrative Construction of Multinational Corporations: An Antenarrative Analysis of Legitimation and Resistance in a Cross-Border Merger.” Organization Science 22 (2): 370–90.
Vaara, Eero, Janne Tienari, and Juha Laurila
2006 “Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring.” Organization Studies 27 (6): 789–813.
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118.
Wagemans, Andrea, Tamara Witschge, and Frank Harbers
2019 “Impact as Driving Force of Journalistic and Social Change.” Journalism 20 (4): 552–567.
Waisbord, Silvio, and Adriana Amado
2017 “Populist Communication by Digital Means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1330–46.
Watts, Mark D., D. Domke, Dhavan V. Shah, and David P. Fan
1999 “Elite Cues and Media Bias in Presidential Campaigns.” Communication Research 26 (2): 144–75.
Whipple, Kelsey N., and Jeremy L. Shermak
2020 “The Enemy of My Enemy Is My Tweet: How #NotTheEnemy Twitter Discourse Defended the Journalistic Paradigm.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 97 (1): 188–210.
Wodak, Ruth, Majid Khosravinik, and Brigitte Mral
eds. 2013 Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
Zimmerman, Monica A., and Gerald J. Zeitz
2002 “Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy.” The Academy of Management Review 27 (3): 414–31.