Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourses of Fake News
Edited by Scott Wright
[Journal of Language and Politics 20:5] 2021
► pp. 741–760

‘Fake news’ discourses

An exploration of Russian and Persian Tweets

ORCID logo | Queensland University of Technology
ORCID logo | Queensland University of Technology
This article explores the strategic use of ‘fake news’ discourses in non-democratic contexts using a mixed-methods approach grounded in social network analysis and discourse theory. In contexts such as Russia and Iran, where the opposition generally does not have unrestricted access to the political public sphere, social media platforms serve to influence discourses. Given the prevalence of fake news discourses, previous studies have already focused extensively on the political elite and their use of this discourse within Western or Anglo-American contexts, and on the typologies of ‘fake news’. Our findings address this research gap and suggest that ordinary users in non-Western and non-democratic settings do not differentiate between ‘fake news’ types. Rather, they employ the discourse as a means to strategically delegitimise and discredit their opponents.
Keywords: authoritarian regimes, discourse theory, fake news, propaganda, Twitter
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1‘Fake News’ and Social Media
    • 1.2‘Fake News’ and Discursive Struggles
  • 2.Methodology
  • 3.Findings
    • 3.1Russian Tweets
      • 3.1.1Topics of discussion
      • 3.1.2Pro- and anti-Kremlin clusters
    • 3.2Persian Tweets
      • 3.2.1Pro- vs anti-regime discourses
      • 3.2.2Anti-establishment discursive alliances
    • 3.3Comparative insights
  • 4.Summative conclusions
  • Conflict of Interests
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 16 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21032.deh
References (38)
References
Al-Rawi, Ahmed. 2019. “Gatekeeping Fake News Discourses on Mainstream Media Versus Social Media.” Social Science Computer Review 37, no. 6: 687–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allcott, Hunt, & Matthew Gentzkow. 2017. “Social media and fake news in the 2016 election.” Journal of economic perspectives 31, no. 2: 211–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldino, Daniel, & Jarrad Goold. 2014. “Iran and the emergence of information and communications technology: the evolution of revolution?.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68, no. 1: 17–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BBC. 2020a. “Peskov: obvineniya vlastei v otravlenii Navalnogo – pustoi shum.” (Peskov: accusations of the poisoning of Navalny are empty noise.). August 25, 2020. [URL]
. 2020b. “Belarus election: Opposition leader Tikhanovskaya left ‘for sake of her children’”. August 12, 2020. [URL]
Bidder, Benjamin & Christian Esch. 2020. “I Assert that Putin Was Behind the Crime”. Der Spiegel. October 1, 2020. [URL]
Blondel, Vincent D., Jean Loup Guillaume, Renauld Lambiotte, & Etienne Lefebvre. 2008. “Fast unfolding of communities in large networks” Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, no. 10: P10008. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucher, Taina, & Anne Helmond. 2017. “The affordances of social media platforms.” In SAGE handbook of social media, edited by Jean Burgess, Alice Marwick, & Thomas Poell, 233–253. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Burns, Axel, & Ben Eltham. 2009. “Twitter free Iran: An evaluation of Twitter’s role in public diplomacy and information operations in Iran’s 2009 election crisis.” In: Communications Policy & Research Forum 2009, 19th-20th November 2009, University of Technology, Sydney, 298–310.Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico. 2018. “Diversifying the Other: Antagonism, agonism and the multiplicity of articulations of self and other.” In: Current Perspectives on communication and media research, edited by Laura Peja, Nico Carpentier, Fausto Colombo, Maria Francesca Murru, Simone Tosoni, Richard Kilborn, Leif Kramp, Risto Kunelius, Anthony McNicholas, Hannu Nieminen, and Pille Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, 145–162. Bremen: edition lumière.Google Scholar
Dehghan, Ehsan. 2020. “Networked Discursive Alliances: Antagonism, Agonism, and the Dynamics of Discursive Struggles in the Australian Twittersphere.” PhD diss. Queensland University of Technology, 2020.Google Scholar
Dehghan, Ehsan, Axel Bruns, Peta Mitchell, & Brenda Moon. 2020. “Discourse analytical studies on social media platforms: A data-driven mixed-methods approach”. In Produsing Theory in a Digital World: The Intersection of Audiences and Production in Contemporary Theory. Vol 3, edited by Rebecca Ann Lind, 159–177. Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Egelhofer, Jana Laura, Leos Aaldering, Jakob Moritz Eberl, Sebastian Galyga, & Sophie Lecheler. 2020. “From Novelty to Normalization? How Journalists Use the Term “Fake News” in their Reporting”. Journalism Studies 21, no. 10: 1323–1343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egelhofer, Jana Laura, & Sophie Lecheler. 2019. “Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda.” Annals of the International Communication Association 43, no. 2: 97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esser, Frank. 2019. “Advances in comparative political communication research through contextualization and cumulation of evidence.” Political Communication 36 (4): 680–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esser, Frank, & Barbara Pfetsch. 2017. “Political communication.” In Comparative Politics, edited by Daniele. 327–346. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farkas, Johan, & Jannick Schou. 2018. “Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood.” Javnost-The Public 25, no. 3: 298–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2018. “Social Media and Populism: An Elective Affinity?” Media, Culture & Society 40, no. 5: 745–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerbaudo, Paolo & Francesco Screti. 2017. “Reclaiming popular sovereignty: the vision of the state in the discourse of Podemos and the Movimento 5 Stelle.” Javnost: The Public 24, no. 4: 320–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glazunova, Sofya. 2020. “Digital media as a tool for non-systemic opposition in Russia: A case study of Alexey Navalny’s populist communications on YouTube.” PhD diss. Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
Hallin, Daniel C., & Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kargar, Simin, & Keith McManamen. 2018. “Censorship and collateral damage: Analyzing the Telegram ban in Iran.” Berkman Klein Center Research Publication, 2018–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, John, Vladimir Barash, Karina Alexanyan, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, Urs Gasser, & John G. Palfrey. 2012. “Mapping Russian Twitter.” Berkman Center Research Publication 2012–3. [URL]
Laclau, Ernesto, & Chantal Mouffe. 2014. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso Trade.Google Scholar
Meduza. 2020a. “Ukrainian intelligence lured suspected Russian mercenaries to Belarus, journalists report.” August 19, 2020. [URL]
. 2020b. “But help came. How the Russian state media rescued Belarusian broadcasters from political pluralism.” September 16, 2020. [URL]
Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2005. On the Political. Abingdon: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2015. Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pocheptsov, Georgii. 2020. “Novyi tip voiny lezhit v upravlenii obschestvennym diskursom.” (New type of war lies in the management of social discourse). Rezonans, September 15, 2020. [URL]
Pfetsch, Barbara. 2014. “The idea of political communication cultures and its empirical correlates”. In Political communication cultures in Europe, edited by Barbara Pfetsch. 13–30. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Roth, Andrew. 2020. “Belarus blues: can Europe’s ‘last dictator’ survive rising discontent?” Guardian. June 16, 2020. [URL]
Schapals, Aljosha Karim. 2018. “Fake news: Australian and British journalists’ role perceptions in an era of “alternative facts”. Journalism Practice 12, no. 8: 976–985. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spaiser, Viktoria, Thomas Chadefaux, Karsten Donnay, Fabian Russmann, & Dirk Helbing. 2017. “Communication power struggles on social media: A case study of the 2011–12 Russian protests.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14, no. 2: 132–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tandoc, Edson C., Wei Lim Zheng, & Richard Ling. 2018. “Defining ‘Fake News’: A Typology of Scholarly Definitions.” Digital Journalism 6, no. 2: 137–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torfing, Jacob. 1999. New theories of discourse: Laclau, Mouffe, and Zizek. Vol. 3011. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
White, Stephen, & Ian McAllister. 2014. “Did Russia (nearly) have a Facebook revolution in 2011? Social media’s challenge to authoritarianism.” Politics 34, no. 1: 72–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Mamaev, Bogdan
2024. The Evolution of Authoritarianism and Contentious Action in Russia, DOI logo
Farkas, Johan
2023. Fake News in Metajournalistic Discourse. Journalism Studies 24:4 ► pp. 423 ff. DOI logo
Glazunova, Sofya & Malmi Amadoru
2023. “Anti-Regime Influentials” Across Platforms: A Case Study of the Free Navalny Protests in Russia. Media and Communication 11:3 ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Glazunova, Sofya
2022. Non-systemic Opposition: Challenges and Communication Tactics. In Digital Activism in Russia, ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Glazunova, Sofya
2022. Conclusion. In Digital Activism in Russia, ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Kermani, Hossein & Niloofar Hooman
2022. Hashtag feminism in a blocked context: The mechanisms of unfolding and disrupting #rape on Persian Twitter. New Media & Society ► pp. 146144482211288 ff. DOI logo
Zaini, Amin
2022. Co-text and critical reading for international postgraduates in Australia. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 40:3 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Wright, Scott
2021. Discourses of fake news. Journal of Language and Politics 20:5 ► pp. 641 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.