Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 21:4 (2022) ► pp.589–612

Fighting talk

The use of the conceptual metaphor climate change is conflict in the UK Houses of Parliament, 2015–2019

| Østfold University College | University of Gothenburg
ORCID logo | University of Gothenburg
Analyses on news media data in Conceptual Metaphor Theory have highlighted several frequent metaphors used to understand climate change including climate change is conflict. This article analyses the frequency of that conceptual metaphor in a corpus of UK parliamentary debates on climate change. The language of political decision-makers is important to scrutinise because this group have the social and legislative power needed to deal with the issue. Our analysis shows the conceptual metaphor itself, and all three of its most frequent linguistic realisations (‘challenge,’ ‘impact,’ ‘tackle’), increased in use between 2015 and 2019. Additionally, three notable semantic and pragmatic trends were observed: first, apparently little recognition of human behaviour as a cause of climate change; second, a narrative of Us/People vs Climate Change; and third, that political decision-makers are taking climate change increasingly seriously. Some of these findings challenge existing knowledge and thus beg questions that require future research efforts.
Keywords: climate change, political discourse, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, climate change is conflict , corpus linguistics, discourse analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Data collection
    • 3.2Data analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Frequency of occurrence across time
    • 4.2More nuanced trends
      • 4.2.1 climate change is conflict: Ignoring human agency in climate change
      • 4.2.2 climate change is conflict: The opposition of People and Climate Change
      • 4.2.3 climate change is conflict: Increasing acknowledgment of the need to address climate change
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 31 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21052.cur
References (51)
References
Anderson, Alison G. 2014. Media, Environment and the Network Society. Palgrave Studies in Media and Environmental Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2019. AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from [URL]
Atanasova, Dimitrinka, and Nelya Koteyko. 2017a. “Metaphors in Guardian Online and Mail Online Opinion-page Content on Climate Change: War, Religion, and Politics.” Environmental Communication, 11(4): 452–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. “Metaphors in Online Editorials and Op-eds About Climate Change, 2006 – 2013: A Study of Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States.” In The Role of Language in The Climate Change Debate, ed. by Kjersti Fløttum, 71–89. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2018. “Conclusion: Reflecting on Reflective Research.” In Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review, ed. by Charlotte Taylor and Anna Marchi, 281–292. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BBC News. 2019. UK Parliament Declares Climate Change Emergency, May 1, 2019. Accessed November 8, 2019. [URL]
Bell, Allan. 2007. “Text, Time and Technology in News English.” In Redesigning English. 2nd edition, ed. by Sharon Goodman, David Graddol and Theresa Lillis, 79–105. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berglez, Peter, and Walid Al-Saqaf. 2021. “Extreme Weather and Climate Change: Social Media Results, 2008–2017.” Environmental Hazards, 20(4): 382–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boykoff, Maxwell T. 2008. “The Cultural Politics of Climate Change Discourse in UK Tabloids.” Political Geography, 271: 549–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Benjamin P. and John S. G. Currie. In progress. “Towards Systematizing Metaphor Analysis: Evidence from Corpora and Lexicogrammatical Recognition Criteria.” To be offered to Corpora.
Cohen, Maurie. 2011. “Is the UK Preparing for “War”? Military Metaphors, Personal Carbon Allowances, and Consumption Rationing in Historical Perspective.” Climatic Change, 104(2): 199–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, Alice. 1999. “Corpus-Based Research into Metaphor.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor, the Cambridge and Applied Linguistics Series, ed. by Lynne Cameron and Graham Low, 177–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. 2019. Climate Change Explained. Last modified July 25, 2019. Accessed March 3, 2020. [URL]
Fielding, Kelly S., Brian W. Head, Warren Laffan, Mark Western, and Ove Hoegh-Guldberg. 2012. “Australian Politicians’ Beliefs about Climate Change: Political Partisanship and Political Ideology.” Environmental Politics: Climate Change, National Politics and Grassroots Action, 21(5): 712–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, and Paul H. Thibodeau. 2017. “Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change.” Environmental Communication, 11(6): 769–783. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas, Tony McEnery, Peter Diggle, and Paul Baker. 2012. “The Peaks and Troughs of Corpus-Based Contextual Analysis.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(2): 151–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio. 2014. “Reformulation and Recontextualization in Popularization Discourse.” Ibérica, Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 271: 15–34.Google Scholar
Group, Pragglejazz. 2007. “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hansard. n.d. Hansard. Accessed February 3, 2020. [URL]
Hansson, Sten. 2018. “Analysing Opposition-Government Blame Games: Argument Models and Strategic Maneuvering.” Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3): 228–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2010. “Constructing Proximity: Relating to Readers in Popular and Professional Science.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 116–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IPCC. 2018. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPPC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, ed. by Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield, 321. Geneva: World Meteorological Organisation. Accessed April 17, 2020. [URL]
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, Jane Espenson and Alan Schwartz. 1991. The Master Metaphor List. 2nd edition. Technical Report. University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2004. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 3rd edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Macmillan Dictionary. 2020. Accessed March 2, 2020. [URL]
Moser, Susanne C. 2014. “Communicating Adaptation to Climate Change: The Art and Science of Public Engagement When Climate Change Comes Home.” WIREs Clim Change, 51: 337–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Siddhartha. 2010. The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Nerlich, Brigitte. 2012. “‘Low Carbon’ Metals, Markets and Metaphors: The Creation of Economic Expectations about Climate Change Mitigation.” Climatic Change, 110(1–2): 31–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norton, Cherry, and Mike Hulme. 2019. “Telling One Story, or Many? An Ecolinguistic Analysis of Climate Change Stories in UK National Newspaper Editorials.” Geoforum, 1041: 114–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ockwell, David, Lorraine Whitmarsh, and Saffron O’Neill. 2009. “Reorienting Climate Change Communication for Effective Mitigation.” Science Communication, 30(3): 305–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Saffron, and Sophie Nicolson-Cole. 2009. “‘Fear Won’t Do It’ Promoting Positive Engagement With Climate Change Through Visual and Iconic Representations.” Science Communication, 30(3): 355–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. 2000. Accessed March 2, 2020. [URL]
Phillips, Miranda, and Ian Simpson. 2015. “Politics: Disengaged and Disconnected? Trends in Attitudes Towards Politics”. In British Social Attitudes 32, ed. by John Curtice & Rachel Ormston, 122–145. London: National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
Roget’s Thesaurus. 1999. Accessed February 10, 2020. [URL]
Shaw, Christopher, and Brigitte Nerlich. 2015. “Metaphor as a Mechanism of Global Climate Change Governance: A Study of International Policies, 1992–2012.” Ecological Economics, 109(1): 34–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shehata, Adam, and David Nicolas Hopmann. 2012. “FRAMING CLIMATE CHANGE: A Study of US and Swedish Press Coverage of Global Warming.” Journalism Studies (London, England), 13(2): 175–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Gideon. 2019. “Concern about Climate Change Reaches Record Levels with Half Now ‘Very Concerned.’” Ipsos MORI, August 12, 2019. Accessed May 11, 2020. [URL]
Taylor, Charlotte. & Marchi, Anna. 2018. “Introduction: Partiality and Reflexivity.” In Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review, ed. by Charlotte Taylor & Anna Marchi, 1–15. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
The London School of Economics. 2020. What is the 2008 Climate Change Act?, April 30, 2020. Accessed August 10, 2020. [URL]
Thesen, Gunnar. 2013. “When Good News is Scarce and Bad News is Good: Government Responsibilities and Opposition Possibilities in Political Agenda-Setting.” European Journal of Political Research, 52(3): 364–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics At Work (Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 6). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
UN Development Programme & University of Oxford. 2021. “People’s Climate Vote: Results.” [URL]. Accessed April 6, 2021.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society, 4 (2): 249–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, Rebecca. 2017. “Taming the Climate? Corpus Analysis of Politicians’ Speech on Climate Change.” Environmental Politics, 26(2): 212–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “The Role of National Politicians in Global Climate Governance.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 3(3): 885–903.Google Scholar
Woods, Ruth, Ana Fernández, and Sharon Coen. 2012. “The Use of Religious Metaphors by UK Newspapers to Describe and Denigrate Climate Change.” Public Understanding of Science, 21(3): 323–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rudenko, Elena, Yanina Morozova & A.S. Salamova
2024. Environmental issues through a metaphorical lens. SHS Web of Conferences 195 ► pp. 03001 ff. DOI logo
Paliichuk, Elina
2023. A spiderweb of human trafficking: An empirical linguistic study. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :43(4) ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.