Cover not available
Article published In:
(De)legitimising EUrope in times of crisis
Edited by Franco Zappettini and Samuel Bennett
[Journal of Language and Politics 21:2] 2022
► pp. 208–232

De/legitimising EUrope through the performance of crises

The far-right Alternative for Germany on “climate hysteria” and “corona hysteria”

ORCID logo | University of Leicester
ORCID logo | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

This article illuminates the far-right populist Alternative for Germany's (AfD) performances of delegitmisation vis-à-vis EUrope and legitmisation of itself/the nation by articulating two paradigmatic, transnational crises: climate change and COVID-19. It asks: ‘how does the far-right AfD perform these two crises to legitimise itself and delegitimize others?’ and ‘what similarities/differences exist between the performance of these two crises in terms of topics, narrative (genres) and their linguistic realisations?’. To explore AfD’s de/legitimisation efforts, written texts and videos by AfD representatives through which they intervene in discourses about climate change in 2019 and COVID-19 in 2020 are analysed. The analysis identifies a two-dimensional process of narrative delegitimization, vilifying national and backgrounding EUropean ‘others’, and illustrates that a comic-romantic emplotment of ethno-national rebirth pre-configures the largely same topics and topoi. In so doing, the article, furthermore, takes another step towards the conceptual integration of narrative (genre) into the Discourse-Historical Approach in Critical Discourse Studies.

Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies, narrative, far right, radical right, climate change, global warming, nationalism, COVID-19, European Union
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.De/legitimation in and through discourse and narrative
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Entry-level analysis of macro-topics
    • 4.2Narrative-level analysis of genres
    • 4.3In-depth topos analysis
      • 4.3.1Protecting the economy
      • 4.3.2Restoring national sovereignty
      • 4.3.3Lifting the veil of climate change irrationalism
      • 4.3.4Denouncing left-wing excesses
      • 4.3.5Demasking an incompetent elite
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21064.for
References
Abbott, Porter
2002 The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albertazzi, Daniele, Donatella Bonansinga, and Mattia Zulianello
2021 “The right-wing alliance at the time of the Covid-19 pandemic: all change?” Contemporary Italian Politics 13 (2): 181–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arzheimer, Kai
2015 “The AfD: Finally a successful right-wing populist Eurosceptic party for Germany?” West European Politics 38 (3): 535–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bax, Stephen
2011 Discourse and Genre: Analysing Language in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Samuel, Artur Lipiński, and Agnieszka Stępińska
2020 Populist Communication on Social Media. Working paper. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Samuel
2019 “Values as tools of legitimation in EU and UK Brexit discourses.” In Discourses of Brexit edited by Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 17–32. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 “Mythopoetic legitimation and the recontextualisation of Europe’s foundational myth.” Journal of Language and Politics. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth
2019 “Positioning “the people” and its enemies: Populism and nationalism in AfD and UKIP.” Javnost 26 (1): 89–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr
2005 “Language and legitimization: Developments in the proximization model of Political Discourse Analysis.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 7–36.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul A.
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eder, Klaus
1988 Die Vergesellschaftung der Natur. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard, and Özgür Özvatan
2019 “Beyond the ‘German forest’: Environmental communication by the far right in Germany.” In The Far Right and the Environment edited by Bernhard Forchtner, 216–236. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard, and Balsa Lubarda
Under review. “Towards a physiognomy of climate-change communication by the far right: scepticisms and beyond in the European Parliament.”
Forchtner, Bernhard, Marcos Engelken Jorge, and Klaus Eder
2020 “Towards a revised theory of collective learning processes: argumentation, narrative and the making of the social bond.” European Journal of Social Theory 23 (2): 200–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forchtner, Bernhard
2016 Lessons from the Past? Memory, Narrativity and Subjectivity. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Climate change and the far right.” WIREs Climate Change 10 (5): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Critique, Habermas and narrative (genre): The Discourse-Historical Approach in Critical Discourse Studies.” Critical Discourse Studies. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frye, Northrop
1957 Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ganesh, Bharath, and Caterina Froio
2020 “A “Europe des Nations”.” Journal of European Integration 42 (5): 715–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gidron, Noam, and Bart Bonikowski
2013 “Varieties of populism: Literature review and research agenda.” Weatherhead Working Paper Series No. 13–0004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas Julien
1983 Structural Semantics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1987 Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
2008 “Communicative action and the detranscendentalized ‘use of reason’.” In Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays edited by Jürgen Habermas, 24–76. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hultman, Martin, Anna Björk, and Tamya Viinikka
2019 “Far-right and climate change denial. Denouncing environmental challenges via anti-establishment rhetoric, marketing of doubts, industrial/breadwinner masculinities enactments and ethno-nationalism.” In The Far Right and the Environment edited by Bernhard Forchtner, 121–135. Oxon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer
(eds.) 2019 Discourses of Brexit. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meretoja, Hanna
2020 “A dialogics of counter-narratives.” In The Routledge Handbook of Counter-Narratives edited by Klarissa Lueg and Marianne Wolff Lundholt, 30–42. Oxon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, Benjamin
2015 “How to perform crisis: A model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism.” Government and Opposition 50 (2), 189–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas
2007 Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 The Far Right Today. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Özvatan, Özgür, and Bernhard Forchtner
2019 “The far-right Alternative für Deutschland in Germany: towards a ‘happy ending’?” In The New Authoritarianism. Volume 2 edited by Alan Waring, 199–225. Stuttgart: ibidem.Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir
1968 Morphology of the Folktale. University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2017 “ The discourse-historical approach .” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies edited by John Flowerdew and John Richardson, 44–59. Oxon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “ ‘Narrative’ I can’t hear that anymore.’ A linguistic critique of an overstretched umbrella term in cultural and social science studies, discussed with the example of the discourse on climate change.” Critical Discourse Studies 18 (3): 368–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul
1984 Time and Narrative. Volume 1. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rieder, Maria, and Hendrik Theine
2019 “ ‘Piketty is a genius, but…’.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (3): 248–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rivers, Damian, and Andrew Ross
2020 “Authority (de)legitimation in the border wall Twitter discourse of President Trump.” Journal of Language and Politics 19 (5): 831–856. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rydgren, Jens
2007 “The sociology of the radical right.” Annual Review of Sociology 331: 241–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Somers, Margaret
1994 “The narrative constitution of identity.” Theory and Society 23 (5): 605–649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 “Legitimation in discourse and communication.” Discourse & Communication, 1 (1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rensburg, Willem
2015 “Climate change skepticism: A conceptual re-evaluation.” SAGE Open, 5 (2): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Guofeng
2020 “Legitimization strategies in China’s official media: the 2018 vaccine scandal in China.” Social Semiotics 30 (5): 685–698. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max
1964 The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
White, Hayden
1980 “The value of narrativity in the representation of reality.” Critical Inquiry 7 (1), 5–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2020 The Politics of Fear. The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. Sage.Google Scholar
Wondreys, Jakub, and Cas Mudde
2020 “Victims of the Pandemic? European Far-Right Parties and COVID-19.” Nationalities Papers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappettini, Franco
2019 “The Brexit referendum: How trade and immigration in the discourses of the official campaigns have legitimised a toxic (inter)national logic.” Critical Discourse Studies. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappettini, Franco, and Marzia Maccaferri
In press. “Euroscepticism between populism and technocracy: the case of Italian Lega and Movimento 5 Stelle.” Journal of Contemporary European Research. DOI logo
Zappettini, Franco, and Michal Krzyżanowski
(eds.) 2019 ““Brexit” as a social & political crisis.” Special Issue of Critical Discourse Studies 16 (4).Google Scholar