Cover not available
Article published In:
(De)legitimising EUrope in times of crisis
Edited by Franco Zappettini and Samuel Bennett
[Journal of Language and Politics 21:2] 2022
► pp. 255–276

Attack of the critics

Metaphorical delegitimisation in Viktor Orbán’s discourse during the Covid-19 pandemic

ORCID logo | Corvinus University of Budapest
| Centre for Social Sciences

This paper presents a case study of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s delegitimisation discourse on the European Union in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. We focused on how the EU and its member states were depicted metaphorically in PM Orbán’s weekly radio interviews. Relying on the discourse dynamics approach, we identified the metaphorical expressions the PM used to legitimise the crisis management of the Hungarian government and delegitimise critical comment from international voices in the context of the European Union. Our results showed that supranational bodies were depicted as authority figures and this image was reinforced by the use of particular verbal motifs. Rhetorical ambiguity was also found regarding Western Europe, whereas the notion of friendship was propagated when referring to the relationship between Hungary and the Visegrád countries Czechia, Poland, and Slovakia.

Keywords: Covid-19, delegitimisation, discourse dynamics approach, metaphorical language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.(De)legitimising the European Union in the rhetoric of Fidesz and PM Orbán
  • 3.Metaphors and political communication
  • 4.Corpus and methodology
  • 5.Viktor Orbán’s (de)legitimising rhetoric through metaphors
    • 5.1Allies and enemies in the war on Covid-19
    • 5.2Personification: Brussels and the member states
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21068.sza
References
Batory, Agnes
2008 “Euroscepticism in the Hungarian Party System : Voices from the Wilderness?” In Opposing Europe?: the Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism, ed. by Andrzej Szczypiorski and Ralph Taggart, 263–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beciu, Camelia, and Mirela Lazar
2021 “ ‘We’ in the EU: (De)Legitimizing Power Relations and Status. The Case of the 2019 European Elections in Romania.” Journal of Language and Politics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benczes, István, and Réka Benczes
2018 “From Financial Support Package via Rescue Aid to Bailout:burge Framing the Management of the Greek Sovereign Debt Crisis.” Society and Economy 40 (3): 431–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benczes, Réka, and Lilla Petronella Szabó
2020 “Brussels – Boss, Bully or the Big Brother? Framing conflict in Contemporary Hungarian Political Rhetoric.” Jezikoslovlje 21 (3): 345–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bene, Márton, and Zsolt Boda
2021 “Hungary: Crisis as Usual – Populist Governance and the Pandemic.” In Populism and the Politicization of the COVID-19 Crisis in Europe, ed. by Giuliano Bobba and Nicolas Hubé, 87–100. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Samuel
2022 “Mythopoetic Legitimation and the Recontextualisation Of Europe’s Foundational Myth.” Journal of Language and Politics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bocskor, Ákos
2018 “Anti-Immigration Discourses in Hungary during the ‘Crisis’ Year: The Orbán Government’s ‘National Consultation’ Campaign of 2015.” Sociology 52 (3): 551–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar, Mario, and Rita Brdar-Szabó
2011 “Metonymy, Metaphor and the ‘Weekend Frame of Mind’: Towards Motivating the Micro-Variation in One Type of Metonymy.” In Motivation in Grammar and the Lexicon, ed. by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden, 233–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgers, Christian, Elly A. Konijn, and Gerard J. Steen
2016 “Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony.” Communication Theory 26 (4): 410–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Lynne, Robert Maslen, Zazie Todd, John Maule, Peter Stratton, and Neil Stanley
2009 “The Discourse Dynamics Approach to Metaphor and Metaphor-Led Discourse Analysis.” Metaphor and Symbol 24 (2): 63–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chateris-Black, Jonathan
2011 Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2018 Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dúró, József
2016 “Becoming Mainstream? Euroscepticism Among Established Parties in V4 Countries.” Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences 4 (4): 35–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engel, Jakob and Ruth Wodak
2013 “ ‘Calculated Ambivalence’ and Holocaust Denial in Austria.” In Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text, ed. by Ruth Wodak and John E. Richardson, 73–96. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, Laura, and Cristina Perales-García
2022 “Widening the North/South Divide? Representations of the Role of the EU During the Covid-19 Crisis in Spanish Media. A Case Study.” Journal of Language and Politics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glied, Viktor, and Norbert Papp
2016 “The ‘Christian Fortress of Hungary’ The ‘Christian Fortress of Hungary’: The Anatomy of the Migration Crisis 2014 in the European Union.” Yearbook of Polish European Studies, no. 191: 133–49.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher
2018 “ ‘Riots Engulfed the City’: An Experimental Study Investigating the Legitimating Effects of Fire Metaphors in Discourses of Disorder.” Discourse & Society 29 (3): 279–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellín-García, Maria Jose
2013 “Legitimization and Delegitimization Strategies on Terrorism.” Pragmatics 23 (2): 301–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Boglárka
2017 “European and National Agendas in the 2014 EP Elections in Hungary.” In Political Communication and European Parliamentary Elections in Times of Crisis, ed. by Ruxandra Boicu, Silvia Branea, and Adriana Stefanel, 167–83. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika, and Elena Semino
2009 “Metaphor, Politics and Gender: A Case Study from Germany.” In Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors, ed. by Kathleen Ahrens, 9–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Körösényi, András, Gábor Illés, and Rudolf Metz
2016 Contingency and Political Action: “The Role of Leadership in Endogenously Created Crises.” Politics and Governance 4(2): 91–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Körösényi, András, Gábor Illés, and Attila Gyulai
2020 The Orbán Regime Plebiscitary Leader Democracy in the Making. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2009 “Metaphor, Culture, and Discourse: The Pressure of Coherence.” In Metaphor and Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff and Zinken Jörg, 11–24. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
2002 Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The All New Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980/2003 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, Dennis
2021 “The EU: The Story of a Tragic Hero and the 27 Dwarfs.” In Political Communication and COVID-19: Governance and Rhetoric in Times of Crisis, ed. by Rodríguez Mora Roberto and Darren G. Lilleker. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mio, Jeffery Scott
1997 “Metaphor and Politics.” Metaphor and Symbol 12 (2): 113–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mos, Martijn
2020 “Ambiguity and Interpretive Politics in the Crisis of European Values: Evidence from Hungary.” East European Politics 36 (2): 267–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2010 “Metaphor in Discourse History.” In Historical Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Kathryn Allan, Margaret E. Winters, and Heli Tissari, 70–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Musu, Costanza
2020 “War Metaphors Used for COVID-19 Are Compelling but Also Dangerous.” The Conversation, May 12 2020 [URL]
Pusztai Ferenc, ed
2011 Magyar Értelmező Kéziszótár [Concise Explanatory Dictionary of Hungarian]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Reyes, Antonio
2011 “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions.” Discourse & Society 22(6): 781–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šarić, Ljiljana
2015 “Metaphors in the Discourse of the National.” Družboslovne Razprave 80 (30): 47–65.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena
2008 Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2021 “ ‘Not Soldiers but Fire-Fighters’ – Metaphors and Covid-19.” Health Communication 36 (1): 50–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabó, Gabriella, and Balázs Kiss
2012 “Trends in Political Communication in Hungary.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 17 (4): 480–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabó, Lilla Petronella
2020 “Háború Járvány Idején – Hogyan Beszél Orbán Viktor a Koronavírusról? [War at the time of a pandemic – How does Viktor Orbán talk about the coronavirus?]” In Vírusba Oltott Politika: világjárvány és politikatudomány, ed. by András Körösényi, Blázs Böcskei, and Andrea Szabó, 123–33. Budapest: Napvilág Kiadó.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wicke, Philipp, and Marianna M. Bolognesi
2021 “Covid-19 Discourse on Twitter: How the Topics, Sentiments, Subjectivity, and Figurative Frames Changed Over Time.” Frontiers in Communication 61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Framing COVID-19: How We Conceptualize and Discuss the Pandemic on Twitter.” PLOS ONE 15 (9). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2015 The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar