Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 21:4 (2022) ► pp.613–635

‘If you see [blank], say [blank]’

From something to /something/

| CUNY Graduate Center – John Jay College of Criminal Justice
The September 11 terrorist attacks emerged as a turning point on security standards, contouring many aspects of public life ever after. Two decades later, the see something, say something campaign stands as one of the New York City trademarks. Its ubiquity across subway platforms intends to raise public awareness by transferring security responsibilities to the general public.
Language is neither innocent nor merely instrumental, any more than is not neutral. This paper disentangles the construction of something in the current context, where the elusive definition of terrorism has enabled distorted perceptions of risk and certainty. The paper adopts a multimodal critical discourse analysis, focusing on the campaign’s use of ambiguity and its lexical and semiotic choices. Ultimately, it intends to crystallize how language resonates with a broader preemptive and never-ending War on Terror rhetoric while paving the way to further analyze the activation of the target of this campaign: you.
Keywords: discourse, War on Terror, rhetoric, semiotics, security, subway
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The subway as a public policy target
  • 2.Materials and methods
  • 3.The construction of something
    • 3.1From context to language; from language to context
    • 3.2Semantic vs. poetic meanings
    • 3.3A forward-looking, never-ending preemption
    • 3.4From something to something
  • 4.Discussion
  • Conflicts of interest: None to declare
  • Acknowledgments
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 11 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.21072.bar
References (40)
References
Aradau, Claudia, and Rens van Munster. 2009. “Exceptionalism and the “War on Terror”: Criminology Meets International Relations.” British Journal of Criminology 49 (5): 686–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arnews. 2017. “Empire Shield: Soldiers Stand Watch to Prevent Another 9/11.” Army News Service. [URL]
Barthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies. New York: The Noonday Press.Google Scholar
Bartolucci, Valentina, and Giorgio Gallo. 2015. “Terrorism, System Thinking and Critical Discourse Analysis.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 32 (1): 15–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, John. 1972. Ways of Seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1945. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. “Rituals of Solidarity and Security in the Wake of Terrorist Attack.” Sociological Theory 22 (1): 53–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowell, Alan. 2005. “Subway and Bus Blasts in London Kill at Least 37.” The New York Times, July 8, 2005. [URL]
Department of Homeland Security. 2017. “Chronology of Changes to the Homeland Security Advisory System.” [URL]
. 2012. “If You See Something, Say Something. About the Campaign.” [URL]
. 2012. “What is Suspicious Activity?” [URL]
DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, Jane Mulderrig, and Ruth Wodak. 2011. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, Manny. 2010. “Post-9/11 Slogan a Potent Message from an Ad Man.” The New York Times, May 10, 2010. [URL]
Friesen, Katie. 2007. “The Effects of the Madrid and London Subway Bombings on Europe’s View of Terrorism.” Human Rights and Human Welfare 71: S10–S17.Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul. 2011. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibson, David. 2012. Talk at the Brink: Deliberation and Decision During the Cuban Missile Crisis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York, NY: Free Press of GlencoeGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Bruce. 1998. Inside Terrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Richard. 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2020. “Normalization and the Discursive Construction of “New” Norms and “New” Normality: Discourse in the Paradoxes of Populism and Neoliberalism.” Social Semiotics 30 (4): 431–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin. 2017. “Un-Civility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion.” Journal of Language & Politics 16 (4): 566–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machin, David and Andrea Mayr. 2012. How to do Critical Discourse Analysis. A multimodal Introduction. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
Manhattan Institute. 2018. “Securing Our Cities. Counterterrorism After 9/11.” February 21, 2018. [URL]
Marx, Gary. 1981. “Ironies of Social Control: Authorities as Contributors to Deviance through Escalation, Nonenforcement and Covert Facilitation.” Social problems 28 (3): 221–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathiesen, Thomas. 1994. “General Prevention as Communication.” In A Reader on Punishment, ed. by Antony Duff, and David Garland, 218–238. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McClain, Noah. 2012. “Below the Subway: Taking Care Day In and Day Out” In Against Security: How We Go Wrong at Airports, Subways, and Other Sites of Ambiguous Danger edited by Harvey Molotch, 50–84. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mohr, John W., Robin Wagner-Pacifici, Ronald L. Breiger, and Petko Bogdanov. 2013. “Graphing the Grammar of Motives in National Security Strategies: Cultural Interpretation, Automated Text Analysis and the Drama of Global Politics.” Poetics 41 (6): 670–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molotch, Harvey. 2012. Against Security: How We Go Wrong at Airports, Subways, and Other Sites of Ambiguous Danger. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ocejo, Richard and Stéphane Tonnelat. 2014. “Subway Diaries: How People Experience and Practice Riding the Train.” Ethnography 15 (4): 493–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Price, Michael. 2013. “National Security and Local Police.” Brennan Center for Justice, December 10, 2013. [URL]
Rapoport, David. 2004. “The Four Waves of Modern Terrorism.” In Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy, ed. by Audrey Cronin, and James Lodes, 46–73. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Julian. 2018. “Intelligence and Counterterrorism.” In Routledge Handbook of Terrorism and Counterterrorism, ed. by Andrew Silke, 395–405. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnell, Jim. 2006. “The Increased Emphasis on Visual Imagery, Versus Aural Messages, and Related Ramifications.” Visual Arts Research 32 (2): 56–58.Google Scholar
Solomon, Ty. 2012. “‘I wasn’t angry, because I couldn’t believe it was happening’: Affect and discourse in responses to 9/11.” Review of International Studies 38 (4): 907–928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tavin, Kevin. 2006. “If You See Something, Say Something: Visual Events at the Visual Culture Gathering.” Visual Arts Research 32 (2): 2–6.Google Scholar
Tonnelat, Stéphane, and William Kornblum. 2017. International Express: New Yorkers on the 7 Train. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2008. Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner-Pacifici, Robin. 2010. “Theorizing the Restlessness of Events.” American Journal of Sociology 115 (5): 1351–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. What is an Event? Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar