Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics: Online-First ArticlesThe construction of Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems” in China Daily
A corpus assisted critical discourse analysis
“One country, two systems” (OCTS) is the constitutional principle that established Hong Kong’s high degree of
autonomy after the city’s handover from Britain to China in 1997. This study conducts the first systemic, diachronic analysis of
the discursive construction of OCTS in Chinese news media, focusing on Beijing’s mouthpiece and public diplomacy newspaper,
China Daily. After reviewing the tripartite representation of the principle in the literature, we identify a
refocus from the economic to the legal-political aspect of OCTS and an increasing emphasis on the socio-cultural dimension of OCTS
in China Daily’s news discourses from 1997 to 2020. These patterns indicated OCTS’s changing status from a ‘legitimating ideology’
to a political principle struggling to be ‘legitimate’ in Beijing’s political discourses. Despite disputes about OCTS, we
anticipate that Beijing and Hong Kong’s opposition will continue to abide by this principle in their future interactions.
Keywords: Hong Kong, one country, two systems, corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis,
China Daily
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.“One country, two systems”: A discursive approach
- 3. China Daily and corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis
- 4.Material and methods
- 4.1Corpus building
- 4.2Data analysis
- 5.Results
- 5.1Wordlists
- 5.2Foreigners
- 5.3People
- 5.4Argumentation strategy of OCTS
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 9 January 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22021.den
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22021.den
References (48)
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A
useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees
and asylum seekers in the UK press.” Discourse &
society 19(3): 273–306.
Bhatia, Aditi, and Andrew S. Ross. 2022. “’We
shall not flag or fail, we shall go on to the end” Hashtag activism in Hong Kong
protests.” Journal of Language and
Politics. 21(1): 117–142.
Cao, Xiuling, Danqi Zhang, and Qianjun Luo. 2022. “Attitudinal
stance towards the anti-extradition bill movement in China Daily and South China Morning Post: A corpus-assisted comparative
analysis.” Journal of Language and
Politics. 21(1): 60–80.
Chan, Chi K. 2014. “China as ‘other’: Resistance to
and ambivalence toward national identity in Hong Kong”. China
Perspectives 2014(1): 25–34.
Chou, Kwok P. 2014. “State, market forces and
building national identity in China’s Hong Kong and Macao”. In Macao:
The Formation of a Global City, edited by C. X. George Wei, 186–207. Abingdon: Routledge.
Clark, David J. 1989. “A high degree of autonomy under
the Basic Law: An analysis.” In Hong Kong: The challenge of
transformation, edited by Kathleen Cheek-Milby, and Mushkat Miron, 153–188. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.
Cooney, Sean. 1997. “Why
Taiwan is not Hong Kong: a review of the PRC’s one country, two systems model for reunification with
Taiwan.” Pac. Rim L. & Pol’y
J. 6(3): 497–548.
Davis, Michael C. 2005. “The basic law and
democratisation in Hong Kong.” Loy. U. Chi. Int’l L.
Rev. 3(2): 165–185.
2015. “The Basic Law, universal
suffrage and the rule of law in Hong Kong.” Hastings Int’l & Comp. L.
Rev. 38(2): 275–298.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. “Intertextuality
in critical discourse analysis.” Linguistics and
education 41: 269–93.
Fong, Brian C. H. 2017. “One country, two
nationalisms: Center-periphery relations between Mainland China and Hong Kong,
1997–2016.” Modern
China 43(5): 523–556.
Fu, Hualing, Carole J. Peterson, and Simon N. M. Young (eds). 2005. National
security and fundamental freedoms: Hong Kong’s Article 23 under scrutiny. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Garden, Rose. 2020. “Remarks
by President Trump on Actions Against China.” White House Press Release. [URL] (accessed 22 April 2022).
Ghai, Yash. 1997. Hong
Kong’s new constitutional order: the resumption of Chinese sovereignty and the Basic Law (Vol.
2). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Hartig, Falk. 2018. “China
Daily: Beijing’s Global Voice?” In China’s Media Go
Global, edited by Daya K. Thussu, Hugo de Burgh, and Anbin Shi, 122–140. London: Routledge.
He, Yinan. 2018. “Domestic
troubles, national identity discourse, and China’s attitude towards the West,
2003–2012.” Nations and
nationalism 24(3): 741–766.
Henders, Susan. 2010. Territoriality,
Asymmetry, and Autonomy: Catalonia, Corsica, Hong Kong, and
Tibet. London: Springer.
Ho, Janet, and Ming M. Chiu. 2022. “Media
portrayals of the Hong Kong Occupy Central Movement’s social actors: Multilevel and critical discourse
analysis.” Journal of Language and
Politics. 21(1): 81–116.
Information Office of the State
Council. 2014. The practice of the ‘one country, two Systems’ policy in the Hong
Kong special administrative region. [URL], accessed 13 December 2021 (accessed 22 April 2022).
Jones, Rodney H., and Dennis Chau. 2022. “Metalinguistic
tactics in the Hong Kong protest movement.” Journal of Language and
Politics. 21(1): 143–172.
Ku, Agnes S. 2020. “New forms of youth activism –
Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition Bill movement in the local-national-global nexus.” Space and
polity 24(1): 111–117.
Lee, Francis L. F. 2020. “Solidarity in the
anti-extradition bill movement in Hong Kong.” Critical Asian
Studies 52(1): 18–32.
Lee, Francis. L. F., Gary K. Y. Tang, Samson Yuen, and Edmund W. Cheng. 2020. “Five
Demands and (Not Quite) Beyond: Claim Making and Ideology in Hong Kong’s Anti-Extradition Bill
Movement.” Communist and Post-Communist
Studies 53(4): 22–40.
Liu, Ming, and Jingxue Ma. 2022. “The
politics of fear in Hong Kong protest representations: A corpus-assisted discourse
study.” Journal of Language and
Politics. 21(1): 37–59.
Liu, Ming, and Ling Lin. 2021. “‘One
country, two systems’: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the politics of recontextualisation in British, American and
Chinese newspapers”. Critical
Arts 35(3): 17–34.
Mark, Chi-Kwan. 2017. “To
‘educate’ Deng Xiaoping in capitalism: Thatcher’s visit to China and the future of Hong Kong in
1982.” Cold War
History 17(2): 161–180.
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Wilson. 2001. Corpus
linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ortmann, Stephan. 2015. “The
umbrella movement and Hong Kong’s protracted democratisation process.” Asian
Affairs 46(1): 32–50.
Rezvani, David A. 2012. “Dead autonomy, a thousand cuts
or partial independence? The autonomous status of Hong Kong.” Journal of Contemporary
Asia 42(1): 93–122.
Sansani, Inbal. 2003. “The
threat of Article 23 to civil liberties under the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region.” Human Rights
Brief 10(3): 28–31.
Scott, Ian. 2017. ““One
country, two systems”: the end of a legitimating ideology?.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public
Administration 39(2): 83–99.
So, Alvin Y. 2011. “‘One country, two systems’ and
Hong Kong-China national integration: A crisis-transformation perspective”. Journal of
Contemporary
Asia 41(1): 99–116.
Tyler, Tom R. 2005. “Introduction: Legitimating
ideologies.” Social Justice
Research 18(3): 211–215.
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. “The
Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in
Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Camermen R. Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.
Wang, Guofeng. 2022. “Britain
as a protector, a mediator or an onlooker? Examining the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests in British
newspapers.” Journal of Language and
Politics 21(1): 17–36.
Wang, Zheng. 2008. “National
humiliation, history education, and the politics of historical memory: Patriotic education campaign in
China.” International Studies
Quarterly 52(4): 783–806.
Wodak, Ruth, and Salomi Boukala. 2015. “European
identities and the revival of nationalism in the European Union: A discourse historical
approach.” Journal of language and
politics 14(1): 87–109.
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “The
Discourse Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse
Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, edited
by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: SAGE.
Xiao, Weiyun. 2001. One
country, two systems: An account of the drafting of the Hong Kong Basic
Law. Beijing: Peking University Press.
Yin, Liangen, and Haiyan Wang. 2010. “people-centred
myth: Representation of the Wenchuan earthquake in China Daily”. Discourse &
Communication 4(4): 383–98.