Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 23:2 (2024) ► pp.155–175

Mass identifications and mythical violence

Neoliberal mechanisms of subjectivation in the crisis interregnum

ORCID logo | University of Buenos Aires – CONICET
Whoever intends to answer the question about how collective identities are articulated today in capitalist societies cannot ignore the task of conceptually and empirically articulating two differentiated issues: on the one hand, the anomic situations of disintegration, in which the individualizing logic of neoliberal ideology takes center stage; on the other, the emergence of new phenomena of social authoritarianism in different strata where the psycho-affective dynamics of community identifications become especially relevant. In this article I will analyze the mechanisms of communitarian subjectivation deployed by neoliberalism in the time of its crisis. For this purpose, I examine some oral narratives extracted from a qualitative study of Argentine society, in which the interlocutors thread hypotheses about issues of public significance such as social inequality, the role of the State in our crisis context and the rights of immigrants.
Keywords: neoliberalism, crisis, ideology, subjectivation, authoritarian violence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Systemic disintegration and social entropy
  • 3.“Theft of enjoyment”
  • 4.The mass of narcissists and the need for punishment
  • 5.Profits from cruelty
  • 6.Final words
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22029.pre
References (40)
References
Adorno, Theodor W. et al. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality, New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. and Horkheimer, Max. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 2005. Minima moralia, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Amin, Samir. 2014. “The Return of Fascism in Contemporary Capitalism”, Monthly Review, vol. 66 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Ben. 2016. “Neoliberal affects”, Progress in Human Geography, 40 (6): 734–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balibar, Étienne. 2008. “Violence: ideality and cruelty”, Polis, 191: 1–20.Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens. 2009. “The great transformation of embeddedness”. In Market and Society: The Great Transformation Today, ed. by C. Hann y K. Hart, New York: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1996. “Critique of Violence”. In Selected Writings, vol. 11: 1913–1926, ed. by M. Bullock and M. Jennings, Cambridge, MA: HUP.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc y Chiapello, Ève. 2018. The New Spirit of Capitalism, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2019. “Neoliberalism’s Frankenstein. Authoritarian Freedom in Twenty-First Century ‘Democracies’”. In Authoritarianism. Three Inquiries in Critical Theory, ed. by Brown, Wendy, Gordon, Peter y Pensky, Max, Chicago: UCP.Google Scholar
Cooper, Melinda. 2017. Family Values. New York: Zone. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuesta, Micaela and Prestifilippo, Agustín L. 2021. “Retóricas de la crueldad. Mitos y razones de la desigualdad social”, Pilquen. Sección Ciencias Sociales, 241: 48–61.Google Scholar
Davies, William. 2016. “The New Neoliberalism”, New Left Review (101), 121–134.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, Alain. 2010. The Weariness of the Self, London: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Alan. 2021. “Neoliberalism, the Alt-Right and the Intellectual Dark Web”, Theory, Culture & Society, Vol 38 (6), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forst, Reiner. 2017. Normativity and Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2019. The old is dying and the new cannot be born, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1964. “Why War?” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXII1 (1932–1936), London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
. 1957. “On Narcissism”, In The Standard Edition of The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV1, London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
. 1949. Group Psychology and Analysis of The Ego, London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 2011. Prison Notebooks, Vol. 21, New York: CUP.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2015. The Lure of Technocracy, Cambridge MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Popular Sovereignty as Procedure”, in: J. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms, New Baskerville: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, Friedric. 1990. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Jonsson, Stefan. 2013. Crows and Democracy, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Menke, Christoph. 2020. “The Crisis of Liberalism”. In Debating Critical Theory, ed. by Julia Christ et al., Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Miller, Jacques-Alain. 1994. “Extimité”. In Lacanian Theory of Discourse: Subject, Structure and Society, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio. 2019. A 21st Century Fascist, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie. 2010. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2015. The Economics of Inequality, Cambridge: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Pérez Sáinz, Juan Pablo. 2016. La historia de la desigualdad en América Latina, Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 2001. The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Prestifilippo, Agustín L. and Wegelin, L. 2016. “El neoliberalismo como trama ideológica en la Argentina reciente”, Utopía y praxis latinoamericana, 211: 29–49.Google Scholar
2019. “La libertad precarizada. Nuevas formas sociales del padecimiento en el mundo del trabajo”, Argumentos. Revista de crítica social, 211: 71–101.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2016. How Will Capitalism End? New York: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2017a. Buying Time, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2017b. “The Return of the Repressed”. In The Great Regression, ed. by H. Geiselberger, Cambridge MA: Polity.Google Scholar
von Redecker, Eva. 2021. “Ownership’s Shadow: Neoauthoritarianism as Defense of Phantom Possession”, Critical Times, 3 (1), 33–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. 2006. The Metastases of Enjoyment, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Prestifilippo, Agustín Lucas
2024. Can Democratic “We” Be Thought? The Politics of Negativity in Nihilistic Times. Philosophies 9:2 ► pp. 52 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.