Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 22:6 (2023) ► pp.894–917
A meta-discursive analysis of engagement markers in QAnon anti-immigration comments
To better understand QAnon’s anti-immigration rhetoric, the study conducted a meta-discursive analysis of one of the group’s active Telegram channels by drawing on Hyland’s (2005) model of interaction. Specifically, engagement markers in their immigration-related discourse were analyzed to see how they contribute to endorsing the group’s macro conspiratorial arguments. The results illustrate a complex rhetorical manipulation and nearly unanimous expression of hate toward immigrants, with the use of ‘directives’ and ‘questions’ being the most prevalent metadiscursive markers. The former suggests that the commenters were more assertive or commanding in their tone, while the latter located within rhetorical persuasion, aimed at stimulating negative attitude toward immigrants. Conversely, a low frequency of the ‘shared knowledge’ markers indicates a lack of interest to establish credibility and constructive dialogue with the audience. The study aimed to unpack the nature of anti-immigration extremist discourse on social media, and its potential to incite violence among public.
Keywords: QAnon, conspiracy theory, anti-immigration, Telegram, engagement markers, metadiscursive analysis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.QAnon and political mainstreaming
- 2.1Mediated radicalisation
- 3.The discourse of anti-immigration
- 4.Data and method
- 4.1Engagement analysis
- 5.Findings
- 6.Discussion and conclusion
- Notes
-
References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
References
Al-Subhi, Aisha Saadi
2022 “Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements.” Journal of Pragmatics 1871: 24–40. 
Argentino, Marc-André
2021 “QAnon and the storm of the US Capitol: The offline effect of online conspiracy theories.”. The Conversation. Last Modified January 7, 2021. [URL]
Argentino, Marc-André, Blythe Crawford, Florence Keen, and Hannah Rose
2021 Far From Gone: The Evolution of Extremism in the First 100 Days of the Biden Administration. International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (ICSR). [URL]
BBC
2022 “Giorgia Meloni: Migrants’ fears over Italy’s new far-right prime minister.” Accessed April 25, 2023. [URL]
Billig, Michael
2001 “Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan.” Discourse & Society 12 (3): 267–289.
Bloch, Katrina Rebecca, Tiffany Taylor, and Karen Martinez
2020 “Playing the race card: White injury, White victimhood and the paradox of colour-blind ideology in anti-immigrant discourse.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 43 (7): 1130–1148.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Burnette, Jessie, and Andreea S. Calude
2022 “Wake up New Zealand! Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter# Covid19NZ posts.” Journal of Pragmatics 1961: 6–23.
Calderón, Carlos Arcila, Gonzalo de la Vega, and David Blanco Herrero
2020 “Topic Modeling and Characterization of Hate Speech against Immigrants on Twitter around the Emergence of a Far-Right Party in Spain” Social Sciences 9 (11): 188.
Camille, Katherine
2021 “But you have to have been there to know what we are talking about”: An Examination of the Rhetorical Environments of Cults and Other Extremist Groups and How They Lead to Violence.” Honors Thesis, The University of Maine. [URL]
Cao, Andy, Jason M. Lindo, and Jiee Zhong
2022 Can Social Media Rhetoric Incite Hate Incidents? Evidence from Trump’s” Chinese Virus” Tweets. National Bureau of Economic Research. [URL].
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough
1999 Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cinelli, Matteo, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini
2021 “The echo chamber effect on social media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (9): e2023301118.
Cisneros, J David
2008 “Contaminated communities: The metaphor of” immigrant as pollutant” in media representations of immigration.” Rhetoric & public affairs 11 (4): 569–601.
Cole, Georgia
2017 “The role of semiotics in connecting the spaces, words and embodied experiences of refugee politics.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (2): 303–316.
Crawford, Blyth, and Marc-Andre Argentino
Crowley, James
Cruz, Freddy
2022 “How anti-government extremists and QAnon took over the southern border.”. Accessed April 14, 2023. [URL]
De Zeeuw, Daniël, and Alex Gekker
2023 “A God-Tier LARP? QAnon as Conspiracy Fictioning.” Social Media+ Society 9 (1).
DeChaine, D Robert
2009 “Bordering the civic imaginary: Alienization, fence logic, and the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 95 (1): 43–65.
Demata, Massimiliano, Virginia Zorzi, and Angela Zottola
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga
2021 “Engaging with the reader in research articles in English: Variation across disciplines and linguacultural backgrounds.” English for Specific Purposes 631: 18–32.
Ferraro, Vincent
2016 “Immigration and Crime in the New Destinations, 2000–2007: A Test of the Disorganizing Effect of Migration.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 321: 23–45.
Flores, Lisa A.
2003 “Constructing rhetorical borders: Peons, illegal aliens, and competing narratives of immigration.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 20 (4): 362–387.
Forberg, Peter L.
2022 “From the fringe to the fore: an algorithmic ethnography of the far-right conspiracy theory group QAnon.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 51 (3): 291–317.
Hakoköngäs, Eemeli, Otto Halmesvaara, and Inari Sakki
2020 “Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland.” Social Media + Society 6 (2).
Hart, Christopher
2008 “Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework.” Critical discourse studies 5 (2): 91–106.
Hautli-Janisz, Annette, Katarzyna Budzynska, Conor McKillop, Brian Plüss, Valentin Gold, and Chris Reed
2022 “Questions in argumentative dialogue.” Journal of Pragmatics 1881: 56–79.
Hoops, Joshua F., and Keli Braitman
2018 “The influence of immigration terminology on attribution and empathy.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (2): 149–161.
Hulteng, John L.
1973 The Opinion Function: Editorial and Interpretive Writing for the News Media. New York: Harper & Row.
Hyland, Ken
2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Bloomsbury.
2012 Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse
2005 “Hooking the Reader: A Corpus Study of Evaluative That in Abstracts.” English for Specific Purposes 241: 123–139.
Jaspal, Rusi, and Glynis M. Breakwell
eds. 2014 Identity Process Theory: Identity, Social Action and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KhosraviNik, Majid
2010 “The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis.” Journal of language and Politics 9 (1): 1–28.
Knoblock, Natalia
2020 “Negotiating dominance on Facebook: Positioning of self and others in pro-and anti-Trump comments on immigration.” Discourse & Society 31 (5): 520–539.
Kopytowska, Monika
2013 “Blogging as the mediatization of politics and a new form of social interaction.” In Analyzing genres in political communication, edited by Piotr Ka and Urszula Okulska, 379–421. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kopytowska, Monika, Łukasz Grabowski, and Julita Woźniak
2017 “Mobilizing against the Other: Cyberhate, refugee crisis and proximization.” In Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres, edited by Monika Kopytowska, 57–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lafuente-Millán, Enrique
2013 “Reader engagement across cultures, languages and contexts of publication in business research articles.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 24 (2): 201–223.
Lee, Claire Seungeun, Juan Merizalde, John D. Colautti, Jisun An, and Haewoon Kwak
2022 “Storm the Capitol: Linking Offline Political Speech and Online Twitter Extra-Representational Participation on QAnon and the January 6 Insurrection.” Frontiers in Sociology 71.
Light, Michael T.
2017 “Re-examining the relationship between Latino immigration and racial/ethnic violence.” Social Science Research 651: 222–239.
Ludemann, Dillon
2018 “/pol/emics: Ambiguity, scales, and digital discourse on 4chan.” Discourse, context & media 241: 92–98.
Lupu, Yonatan, Richard Sear, Nicolas Velásquez, Rhys Leahy, Nicholas Johnson Restrepo, Beth Goldberg, and Neil F. Johnson
2023 “Offline events and online hate.” PLoS one 18 (1): e0278511.
MacMillen, Sarah Louise, and Timothy Rush
2022 “QAnon – Religious Roots, Religious Responses.” Critical Sociology 48 (6): 989–1004.
Marshall, Shantal R., and Jenessa R. Shapiro
2018 “When ‘scurry’ vs.’hurry’ makes the difference: Vermin metaphors, disgust, and anti-immigrant attitudes.” Journal of Social Issues 74 (4): 774–789.
Masroor, Farzana
2013 “Argumentative strategies of newspaper editorials in English across cultures.” The Asian ESP Journal Summer Edition 9 (3): 35–72.
McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook
2001 “Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 271: 415–444.
Mudde, Cas
2019 The far right today. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Müller, Karsten, and Carlo Schwarz
2020 “From hashtag to hate crime: Twitter and anti-minority sentiment.” Social Science Research Network (SSRN).
Ono, Kent A., and John M. Sloop
2002 Shifting borders: Rhetoric, immigration, and California’s Proposition 187. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Orts, María Ángeles
2016 “Power distance and persuasion: The tension between imposition and legitimation in international legal genres.” Journal of Pragmatics 921: 1–16.
Peeters, Stijn, Tom Willaert, Marc Tuters, Katrien Beuls, Paul Van Eecke, and Jeroen Van Soest
2023 “A Fringe Mainstreamed, or Tracing Antagonistic Slang between 4chan and Breitbart before and after Trump.” In How Misinformation Propagates on Social Media: A Cross-platform Analysis, edited by Richard Rogers, 165–185. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Prooijen, Jan-Willem van, and Karen M. Douglas
2017 “Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations.” Memory Studies 10 (3): 323–333.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman Group Limited.
Reid, Lesley WIlliams, Harald E. Weiss, Robert M. Adelman, and Charles Jaret
2005 “The immigration-crime relationship: Evidence across U.S. metropolitan areas.” Social Science Research 34 (4): 757–780.
Relia, Kunal, Zhengyi Li, Stephanie H. Cook, and Rumi Chunara
2019 “Race, Ethnicity and National Origin-Based Discrimination in Social Media and Hate Crimes across 100 U.S. Cities.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 13 (01): 417–427. . [URL]
. [URL]Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak
2009 “Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: right-wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom.” Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4): 251–267.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
Rosenberg, Matthew, Astead. W. Herndon, and Nick Corasaniti
2020 “Marjorie Taylor Greene, a QAnon supporter, wins House primary in Georgia.” The New York Times 2020, March 11, 2020. [URL]
Russonello, Giovanni
2021 “QAnon now as popular in US as some major religions, poll suggests.” New York Times, May 27, 2021. [URL]
Strom, Megan, and Emily Alcock
2017 “Floods, waves, and surges: the representation of Latin@ immigrant children in the United States mainstream media.” Critical DIscourse Studies 14 (4): 440–457.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
2015 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 466–485. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2008 Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press.
van Prooijen, Jan-Willem, and Karen M. Douglas
2018 “Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain.” European journal of social psychology 48 (7): 897–908.
Webber, Pauline
1994 “The function of questions in different medical journal genres.” English for Specific Purposes 13 (3): 257–268.
Winant, Howard
1994 Racial conditions: Politics, theory, comparisons. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wodak, Ruth
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2001 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 1–33. London: SAGE Publications.
Yule, George
1996 Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford university press.
Zhang, Justine, Arthur Spirling, and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
2017 “Asking too much? The rhetorical role of questions in political discourse.” In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1558–1572. Copenhagen, Denmark: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Zhang, Yini, Zhiying Yue, Xiyu Yang, Fan Chen, and Nojin Kwak
2022 “How a peripheral ideology becomes mainstream: Strategic performance, audience reaction, and news media amplification in the case of QAnon Twitter accounts.” New Media & Society.