Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 22:6 (2023) ► pp.894–917

A meta-discursive analysis of engagement markers in QAnon anti-immigration comments

ORCID logo | Universiti Malaya
ORCID logo | Rabdan Academy
ORCID logo | Universiti Malaya
ORCID logo | Universiti Malaya
ORCID logo | Universiti Malaya
To better understand QAnon’s anti-immigration rhetoric, the study conducted a meta-discursive analysis of one of the group’s active Telegram channels by drawing on Hyland’s (2005) model of interaction. Specifically, engagement markers in their immigration-related discourse were analyzed to see how they contribute to endorsing the group’s macro conspiratorial arguments. The results illustrate a complex rhetorical manipulation and nearly unanimous expression of hate toward immigrants, with the use of ‘directives’ and ‘questions’ being the most prevalent metadiscursive markers. The former suggests that the commenters were more assertive or commanding in their tone, while the latter located within rhetorical persuasion, aimed at stimulating negative attitude toward immigrants. Conversely, a low frequency of the ‘shared knowledge’ markers indicates a lack of interest to establish credibility and constructive dialogue with the audience. The study aimed to unpack the nature of anti-immigration extremist discourse on social media, and its potential to incite violence among public.
Keywords: QAnon, conspiracy theory, anti-immigration, Telegram, engagement markers, metadiscursive analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.QAnon and political mainstreaming
    • 2.1Mediated radicalisation
  • 3.The discourse of anti-immigration
  • 4.Data and method
    • 4.1Engagement analysis
  • 5.Findings
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 22 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23038.ras
References (71)
References
Al-Subhi, Aisha Saadi. 2022. “Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements.” Journal of Pragmatics 1871: 24–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Argentino, Marc-André. 2021. “QAnon and the storm of the US Capitol: The offline effect of online conspiracy theories.”. The Conversation. Last Modified January 7, 2021. [URL]
Argentino, Marc-André, Blythe Crawford, Florence Keen, and Hannah Rose. 2021. Far From Gone: The Evolution of Extremism in the First 100 Days of the Biden Administration. International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (ICSR). [URL]
BBC. 2022. “Giorgia Meloni: Migrants’ fears over Italy’s new far-right prime minister.” Accessed April 25, 2023. [URL]
Billig, Michael. 2001. “Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan.” Discourse & Society 12 (3): 267–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Katrina Rebecca, Tiffany Taylor, and Karen Martinez. 2020. “Playing the race card: White injury, White victimhood and the paradox of colour-blind ideology in anti-immigrant discourse.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 43 (7): 1130–1148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge university press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnette, Jessie, and Andreea S. Calude. 2022. “Wake up New Zealand! Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter# Covid19NZ posts.” Journal of Pragmatics 1961: 6–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calderón, Carlos Arcila, Gonzalo de la Vega, and David Blanco Herrero. 2020. “Topic Modeling and Characterization of Hate Speech against Immigrants on Twitter around the Emergence of a Far-Right Party in Spain” Social Sciences 9 (11): 188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camille, Katherine. 2021. “But you have to have been there to know what we are talking about”: An Examination of the Rhetorical Environments of Cults and Other Extremist Groups and How They Lead to Violence.” Honors Thesis, The University of Maine. [URL]
Cao, Andy, Jason M. Lindo, and Jiee Zhong. 2022. Can Social Media Rhetoric Incite Hate Incidents? Evidence from Trump’s” Chinese Virus” Tweets. National Bureau of Economic Research. [URL]. DOI logo
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cinelli, Matteo, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini. 2021. “The echo chamber effect on social media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (9): e2023301118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cisneros, J David. 2008. “Contaminated communities: The metaphor of” immigrant as pollutant” in media representations of immigration.” Rhetoric & public affairs 11 (4): 569–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Georgia. 2017. “The role of semiotics in connecting the spaces, words and embodied experiences of refugee politics.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42 (2): 303–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Blyth, and Marc-Andre Argentino. 2021. “QAnon Women in Politics Part One: The QAnon Candidates.” Last Modified April 28, 2021. [URL]
Crowley, James. 2020. “6 celebs who have helped spread the QAnon conspiracy.”. Newsweek. Accessed August 20. [URL]
Cruz, Freddy. 2022. “How anti-government extremists and QAnon took over the southern border.”. Accessed April 14, 2023. [URL]
De Zeeuw, Daniël, and Alex Gekker. 2023. “A God-Tier LARP? QAnon as Conspiracy Fictioning.” Social Media+ Society 9 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeChaine, D Robert. 2009. “Bordering the civic imaginary: Alienization, fence logic, and the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 95 (1): 43–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demata, Massimiliano, Virginia Zorzi, and Angela Zottola. 2022. Conspiracy Theory Discourses. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dontcheva-Navratilova, Olga. 2021. “Engaging with the reader in research articles in English: Variation across disciplines and linguacultural backgrounds.” English for Specific Purposes 631: 18–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, Vincent. 2016. “Immigration and Crime in the New Destinations, 2000–2007: A Test of the Disorganizing Effect of Migration.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 321: 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores, Lisa A. 2003. “Constructing rhetorical borders: Peons, illegal aliens, and competing narratives of immigration.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 20 (4): 362–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forberg, Peter L. 2022. “From the fringe to the fore: an algorithmic ethnography of the far-right conspiracy theory group QAnon.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 51 (3): 291–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakoköngäs, Eemeli, Otto Halmesvaara, and Inari Sakki. 2020. “Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland.” Social Media + Society 6 (2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2008. “Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework.” Critical discourse studies 5 (2): 91–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hautli-Janisz, Annette, Katarzyna Budzynska, Conor McKillop, Brian Plüss, Valentin Gold, and Chris Reed. 2022. “Questions in argumentative dialogue.” Journal of Pragmatics 1881: 56–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoops, Joshua F., and Keli Braitman. 2018. “The influence of immigration terminology on attribution and empathy.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (2): 149–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulteng, John L. 1973. The Opinion Function: Editorial and Interpretive Writing for the News Media. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2012. Disciplinary Identities: Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse. 2005. “Hooking the Reader: A Corpus Study of Evaluative That in Abstracts.” English for Specific Purposes 241: 123–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaspal, Rusi, and Glynis M. Breakwell, eds. 2014. Identity Process Theory: Identity, Social Action and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2010. “The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis.” Journal of language and Politics 9 (1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knoblock, Natalia. 2020. “Negotiating dominance on Facebook: Positioning of self and others in pro-and anti-Trump comments on immigration.” Discourse & Society 31 (5): 520–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2013. “Blogging as the mediatization of politics and a new form of social interaction.” In Analyzing genres in political communication, edited by Piotr Ka and Urszula Okulska, 379–421. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika, Łukasz Grabowski, and Julita Woźniak. 2017. “Mobilizing against the Other: Cyberhate, refugee crisis and proximization.” In Contemporary discourses of hate and radicalism across space and genres, edited by Monika Kopytowska, 57–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lafuente-Millán, Enrique. 2013. “Reader engagement across cultures, languages and contexts of publication in business research articles.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 24 (2): 201–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Claire Seungeun, Juan Merizalde, John D. Colautti, Jisun An, and Haewoon Kwak. 2022. “Storm the Capitol: Linking Offline Political Speech and Online Twitter Extra-Representational Participation on QAnon and the January 6 Insurrection.” Frontiers in Sociology 71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Light, Michael T. 2017. “Re-examining the relationship between Latino immigration and racial/ethnic violence.” Social Science Research 651: 222–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ludemann, Dillon. 2018. “/pol/emics: Ambiguity, scales, and digital discourse on 4chan.” Discourse, context & media 241: 92–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Yonatan, Richard Sear, Nicolas Velásquez, Rhys Leahy, Nicholas Johnson Restrepo, Beth Goldberg, and Neil F. Johnson. 2023. “Offline events and online hate.” PLoS one 18 (1): e0278511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacMillen, Sarah Louise, and Timothy Rush. 2022. “QAnon – Religious Roots, Religious Responses.” Critical Sociology 48 (6): 989–1004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Shantal R., and Jenessa R. Shapiro. 2018. “When ‘scurry’ vs.’hurry’ makes the difference: Vermin metaphors, disgust, and anti-immigrant attitudes.” Journal of Social Issues 74 (4): 774–789. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masroor, Farzana. 2013. “Argumentative strategies of newspaper editorials in English across cultures.” The Asian ESP Journal Summer Edition 9 (3): 35–72.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. “Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 271: 415–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2019. The far right today. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Müller, Karsten, and Carlo Schwarz. 2020. “From hashtag to hate crime: Twitter and anti-minority sentiment.” Social Science Research Network (SSRN). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Kent A., and John M. Sloop. 2002. Shifting borders: Rhetoric, immigration, and California’s Proposition 187. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Orts, María Ángeles. 2016. “Power distance and persuasion: The tension between imposition and legitimation in international legal genres.” Journal of Pragmatics 921: 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peeters, Stijn, Tom Willaert, Marc Tuters, Katrien Beuls, Paul Van Eecke, and Jeroen Van Soest. 2023. “A Fringe Mainstreamed, or Tracing Antagonistic Slang between 4chan and Breitbart before and after Trump.” In How Misinformation Propagates on Social Media: A Cross-platform Analysis, edited by Richard Rogers, 165–185. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Prooijen, Jan-Willem van, and Karen M. Douglas. 2017. “Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations.” Memory Studies 10 (3): 323–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman Group Limited.Google Scholar
Reid, Lesley WIlliams, Harald E. Weiss, Robert M. Adelman, and Charles Jaret. 2005. “The immigration-crime relationship: Evidence across U.S. metropolitan areas.” Social Science Research 34 (4): 757–780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Relia, Kunal, Zhengyi Li, Stephanie H. Cook, and Rumi Chunara. 2019. “Race, Ethnicity and National Origin-Based Discrimination in Social Media and Hate Crimes across 100 U.S. Cities.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 13 (01): 417–427. DOI logo. [URL]
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: right-wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom.” Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4): 251–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Matthew, Astead. W. Herndon, and Nick Corasaniti. 2020. “Marjorie Taylor Greene, a QAnon supporter, wins House primary in Georgia.” The New York Times. 2020, March 11, 2020. [URL]
Russonello, Giovanni. 2021. “QAnon now as popular in US as some major religions, poll suggests.” New York Times, May 27, 2021. [URL]
Strom, Megan, and Emily Alcock. 2017. “Floods, waves, and surges: the representation of Latin@ immigrant children in the United States mainstream media.” Critical DIscourse Studies 14 (4): 440–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2015. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 466–485. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Prooijen, Jan-Willem, and Karen M. Douglas. 2018. “Belief in conspiracy theories: Basic principles of an emerging research domain.” European journal of social psychology 48 (7): 897–908. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webber, Pauline. 1994. “The function of questions in different medical journal genres.” English for Specific Purposes 13 (3): 257–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winant, Howard. 1994. Racial conditions: Politics, theory, comparisons. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2016. “The Language of Walls.” YouTube Lecture, November 15, 2016. [URL]
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology.” In Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 1–33. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford university press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Justine, Arthur Spirling, and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil. 2017. “Asking too much? The rhetorical role of questions in political discourse.” In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1558–1572. Copenhagen, Denmark: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yini, Zhiying Yue, Xiyu Yang, Fan Chen, and Nojin Kwak. 2022. “How a peripheral ideology becomes mainstream: Strategic performance, audience reaction, and news media amplification in the case of QAnon Twitter accounts.” New Media & Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar