Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics: Online-First Articles

The (anti-)political logic of authoritarian institutionalism

Party politics and authoritarian consolidation in Russia

ORCID logo | University of Bremen
This paper develops the concept of authoritarian institutionalism — understood as a combination of authoritarianism as a form of discursive closure and institutionalism as a non-antagonistic construction of social relations following the logic of difference based on Laclau’s theory — which can yield insights from a discursive angle into the workings of “competitive authoritarian” regimes characterized by formally multi-party systems. Based on these considerations, the paper undertakes a periodization of party politics in Russia since 1993, which presents a useful case for probing the boundaries of authoritarian institutionalism given the regime-engineered dynamics of party competition since the days of so-called “managed democracy.” In applying the discourse-theoretical toolkit of difference/equivalence, the analysis identifies two phases of authoritarian consolidation since 2000 that have expanded the authoritarian dimension while curtailing the institutionalist operation of difference in the party system, raising the question of a “GDR-ization” of party politics since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Keywords: authoritarianism, institutionalism, political parties, Russian politics, Russian invasion of Ukraine
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Institutionalism/populism and authoritarianism/democracy: Considerations toward a theory of authoritarian institutionalism
  • 3.Party politics and authoritarian institutionalism in Russia
    • 3.1“Managed democracy”: The beginnings (1993–2000)
    • 3.2The heyday of “managed democracy” (2000–11)
    • 3.3Post-Bolotnaya authoritarian consolidation (2012–present)
    • 3.4The Russian party system since 2022: “GDR-ization”?
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 January 2025
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24041.kim
References (39)
References
Alyukov, Maksim et al. 2015. Политика аполитичных. Гражданские движения в России 2011—2013 годов. Moscow: Новое литературное обозрение.Google Scholar
Arditi, Benjamin. 2010. “Review Essay: Populism Is Hegemony Is Politics? On Ernesto Laclau’s ‘On Populist Reason’.” Constellations 17(3): 488–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cleen, Benjamin, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2017. “Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism.” Javnost — The Public 24(4): 301–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dollbaum, Jan Matti. 2020. “Protest Trajectories in Electoral Authoritarianism: From Russia’s ‘For Fair Elections’ Movement to Alexei Navalny’s Presidential Campaign.” Post-Soviet Affairs 36(3): 192–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dollbaum, Jan Matti, and Seongcheol Kim. 2024. “Going Jingo: A Classification of the Wartime Positions of Russia’s ‘Systemic Opposition’ Parties.” Post-Soviet Affairs 40(3): 222–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt. 2016. “Populist Polarization and Party System Institutionalization.” Problems of Post-Communism 63(4): 210–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. [1969]2002. Archaeology of Knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gabowitsch, Mischa. 2017. Protest in Putin’s Russia. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gel’man, Vladimir. 2005. “Political Opposition in Russia: A Dying Species?” Post-Soviet Affairs 21(3): 226–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy.” Europe-Asia Studies 60(6): 913–930. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerschewski, Johannes. 2023. The Two Logics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glasius, Marlies. 2023. Authoritarian Practices in a Global Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golosov, Grigorii. 2012. “The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia.” In Russia’s Authoritarian Elections, edited by Stephen White, 93–109. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guriev, Sergei, and Daniel Treisman. 2022. Spin Dictators: The Changing Face of Tyranny in the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, David, and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2000. “Introducing Discourse Theory and Political Analysis.” In Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change, edited by David Howarth, Aletta Norval, and Yannis Stavrakakis, 1–23. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kagarlitsky, Boris. 2002. Russia Under Yeltsin and Putin: Neo-Liberal Autocracy. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Kim, Seongcheol. 2017. “The Populism of the Alternative for Germany (AfD): An Extended Essex School Perspective.” Palgrave Communications 3(5): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “… Because the Homeland Cannot Be in Opposition: Analysing the Discourses of Fidesz and Law and Justice (PiS) from Opposition to Power.” East European Politics 37(2): 332–351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “The Russian Invasion in the Context of Post-Bolotnaya Authoritarian Consolidation.” Russian Analytical Digest 2811: 7–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. “‘Illiberal Democracy’ after Post-Democracy: Revisiting the Case of Hungary.” The Political Quarterly 94(3): 437–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korgunyuk, Yury. 2017. “Classification of Russian Parties.” Russian Politics 2(3): 255–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005a. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 2005b. “Populism: What’s in a Name?” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by Francisco Panizza, 32–49. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. [1996]2007. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. [1985]2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lefort, Claude. 1986. The Political Forms of Modern Society: Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchart, Oliver. 2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
. 2018. Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orbán, Viktor. 2009. “Megőrizni a létezés magyar minőségét.” [URL]
Pavlovsky, Gleb. 2014. “Власти, эмоции и протесты в России.” Gefter. [URL]
Pertsev, Andrei. 2023. “Партий больше нет. Письмо о том, как Путин возрождает ГДР.” [URL]
Reuter, Ora John. 2017. The Origins of Dominant Parties: Building Authoritarian Institutions in Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech. 2019. Poland’s Constitutional Brakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5(3): 297–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenck, Anna. 2024. Flexible Authoritarianism: Cultivating Ambition and Loyalty in Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis et al. 2017. “Extreme Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Revisiting a Reified Association.” Critical Discourse Studies 14(4): 420–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2021. The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourse. London: SAGE. DOI logoGoogle Scholar