Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics: Online-First Articles

Social media, politics, and the rise of the anti-refugee far-right in Turkey

ORCID logo | University of Manchester
ORCID logo | Kilis 7 Aralik University
This paper examines the discursive strategies of Turkey’s emerging far-right political party, the Zafer Partisi (Victory Party). The Party’s leader, Ümit Özdağ, gained unexpected electoral influence in 2023, prominently advocating for the expulsion of Syrian refugees. Combining content and critical discourse analysis, the paper delves into the discursive features of Özdağ’s tweets on refugees. Subsequently, it aims to understand the intricacies of the party’s anti-refugee stance within the context of Turkish politics and its implications for relationships between Turkish society and refugees. The dataset comprises 3008 tweets spanning from November 18, 2022, to November 18, 2023. The analysis reveals Özdağ’s construction of a securitization narrative, framing refugees as a threat and positioning his party as the defender of Turkish identity. His far-right stance, distinguishes itself by strategically targeting Syrian refugees, appealing to public concerns, and casting suspicions on local and international actors, specifically the ruling party in Turkey and the EU.
Keywords: far-right, social media, Turkey, Ümit Özdağ, Zafer Partisi (Victory Party), refugees
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The far-right ideology
  • 3.The emergence of Victory Party
  • 4.Method
  • 5.Content analysis findings
  • 6.CDA findings
  • 7.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 December 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24070.efe
References (36)
References
Balci, Ali, and Filiz Cicioglu. 2020. “Turkey in the discourse of European far right: the uses and abuses of Turkey’s membership process for a counter-hegemony.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 28(1): 100–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Leslie A. 1991. “Content Analysis.” In: Studying Interpersonal Interaction. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Becker, O. Sascha, and Thiemo, Fetzer. 2016. “Does Migration Cause Extreme Voting?” Working Paper 306. London: Warwick.Google Scholar
Bora, Tanıl, Can, Kemal. 2015. Devlet, ocak, dergâh: 12 Eylül’den 1990’lara ülkücü hareket. İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell. 2017. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Fifth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Curiel, Concha. 2020. “Trend towards extreme right-wing populism on Twitter: An analysis of the influence on leaders, media and users.” Communication & Society 33(2): 175–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darendelioğlu, İlhan. 1968. Türkiye’de milliyetçilik hareketleri: toplantılar, mitingler, nümayişler, bildiriler, cemiyetler, basın. Toker Yayınları.Google Scholar
Divita, David. 2023. The Gendered Semiotics of Far-Right Populism on Instagram: A case from Spain. Discourse & Society 341, 22–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, Roger. 2000. “The rebirth of the ‘extreme right’ in Western Europe?” Parliamentary Affairs 53(3): 407–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Efe, İbrahim. 2018. Critical Discourse Analysis of Discourses on and Around Coup D’état in Turkish Newspapers. e-gifder 61, 250–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engesser, Sven, Nicole Ernst, Frank Esser, et al. 2017. “Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology.” Information, Communication & Society 20(8): 1109–1126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erdoğan, M. Murat. 2022. Syrian Barometer. UNHRC.Google Scholar
Fennema, Meindert. 2005. “Populist Parties of the Right.” In: Movements of Exclusion: Radical Right-Wing Populism in the Western World. New York: Nova Publishers, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Groshek, Jacob, and Jiska Engelbert. 2013. “Double differentiation in a cross-national comparison of populist political movements and online media uses in the United States and the Netherlands.” New Media & Society 15(2): 183–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halla, Martin, Wagner, Alexander F., Zweimüller, Josef. 2017. Immigration and Voting for the Far Right. Journal of the European Economic Association 151, 1341–1385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hallahan, Kİrk, Derine Holtzhausen, Betteke van Ruler, et al. 2007. “Defining Strategic Communication.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 1(1): 3–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hameleers, Michael, and Desire Schmuck. 2017. “It’s Us against Them: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Messages Communicated via Social Media.” Information, Communication & Society 20(9): 1425–1444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiousis, Spiro, and Jesper Stromback (eds). 2019. Political Public Relations: Concepts, Principles, and Applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krämer, Benjamin. 2017. “Populist online practices: the function of the Internet in right-wing populism.” Information, Communication & Society 20(9): 1293–1309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. [1st ed.]. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mondon, Aurelien. 2022. Populism, public opinion, and the mainstreaming of the far right: The ‘immigration issue’ and the construction of a reactionary ‘people.’ Politics 02633957221104726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muis, Iris, Schie, Gerwin van, Wieringa, Maranke, Winkel, Tim de. 2019. “Liberation Begins with Stating the Facts’: Framing Statistics and Information Bricolage in Geert Wilders Twitter Practice”. Open Library of Humanities 51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pirro, Andrea L. P. 2023. Far-right: The significance of an umbrella concept. Nations and Nationalism, 101–112.Google Scholar
Post, Stephen. 2019. “Polarizing Communication as Media Effects on Antagonists.” Understanding Communication in Conflicts in Digital Media Societies.” Communication Theory 29(2): 213–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooduijn, Matthijs. 2014. “The Nucleus of Populism: In Search of the Lowest Common Denominator.” Government and Opposition 49(4): 573–599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rydgren, Jens. 2007. “The Sociology of the Radical Right.” Annual Review of Sociology 33(1): 241–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sakki, Inari, and Katarina Pettersson. 2016. “Discursive Constructions of Otherness in Populist Radical Right Political Blogs.” European Journal of Social Psychology 46(2): 156–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Secen, Selim, Serkan Al, and Burak Arslan. 2024. “Electoral Dynamics, New Nationalisms, and Party Positions on Syrian Refugees in Turkey.” Turkish Studies: 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sekeris, Petros, and Christos Vasilakis. 2016. “The Mediterranean Refugees Crisis and Extreme Right Parties: Evidence from Greece.” MPRA Paper 72222. University Library of Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Turkish Statistic Institute. 2023. TÜİK Kurumsal. Available at: [URL] (accessed 23 February 2024).
van Dijk, Teun A. 2023. “(Anti)Racist Discourse.” In: The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (2nd ed.) New York: Routledge, pp. 244–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veriter, Pierre, and Marina Viskanic. 2018. “Dismantling the ‘Jungle’: Migrant Relocation and Extreme Voting in France.” CESifo Working Paper, No. 6927. Munich: Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, de Cillia, Rudolf, Reisigl, Martin, Liebhart, Karin. (1999). The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar