When performance studies meet discourse theory
The political performance analysis protocol as an interdisciplinary methodological tool
Despite its versatility as a methodological tool, discourse analysis suffers from a logocentric bias, a tendency
to primarily focus on text while ignoring the non-textual components of discourse. Although poststructural approaches to discourse
analysis like Discourse Theory (DT) have developed an understanding of discourse going beyond language, there are few practical
methodological tools for scholars from these traditions to engage with these non-textual elements. This article fills that gap by
providing an original qualitative methodological tool, the Political Performance Analysis Protocol (PPAP) which adapts one of the
signature methods of Performance Studies to political performances. It does so by describing the four constitutive elements of
political performances — background symbols and foreground scripts, actor, audience and mise-en-scène — and empirically
illustrating them through the case of Greta Thunberg’s “How dare you?” performance at a United Nations to show the PPAP’s
relevance as a tool complementing other forms of discourse analysis.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Discourse Theory and empirical analysis
- 3.Performance and discourse
- 4.Performance analysis
- 5.From artistic to social performances
- 6.The Political Performance Analysis Protocol
- 6.1Background symbols & foreground scripts
- 6.2Actor
- 6.3Audience
- 6.4Mise-en-scène
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References