Article published In:
Discourse Theory and the Turn to Practice
Edited by Benjamin De Cleen, Nico Carpentier, Jason Glynos, Jana Goyvaerts, Maximilian Grönegräs and Yannis Stavrakakis
[Journal of Language and Politics 24:1] 2025
► pp. 91–114

Studying affect through discourse theory

Towards a methodology of practice

ORCID logo | Cardiff University
ORCID logo | Université de Namur
This article presents a methodological argument for examining the affective dimensions of political identity formation, with a pivotal focus on the role of practice. Grounded in a psychoanalytically inspired discourse theory framework, it advocates for expanding research beyond textual sources to investigate the affective investment inherent in political engagement and the process of collective identity formation. Through an examination of two empirical case studies — the Just Stop Oil movement in the United Kingdom and the ascent of Javier Milei in Argentinean politics — the article proposes four principles to study the articulation of political identities through practice: Signifiers are not just words; beyond counting words; policy is central, and fantasy is a cipher. By underscoring fantasy as a critical dimension in identity formation and, suggesting that, by transcending the conventional Schmittian friend/enemy divide, novel avenues for analysing collective identities will surface.
Keywords: discourse theory, affect, practice, fantasy, transgression, Just Stop Oil, Milei
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Studying discourse as text
  • 3.Studying affect as discourse
  • 4.Towards an affective methodology
    • 4.1Signifiers are not just words
    • 4.2Beyond counting words
    • 4.3Policy is central
    • 4.4Fantasy as a cipher
  • 5.Just Stop Oil
    • 5.1Signifiers are not just words
    • 5.2Beyond counting words
    • 5.3Policy is central
    • 5.4Fantasy as a cipher
  • 6.Javier Milei
    • 6.1Signifiers are not just words
    • 6.2Beyond counting words
    • 6.3Policy is central
    • 6.4Fantasy as a cipher
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Bibliography
Published online: 6 January 2025
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.24197.ekl
References (61)
Bibliography
Åhäll, Linda. 2018. “Affect as Methodology: Feminism and the Politics of Emotion.” International Political Sociology 12 (1): 36–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Aiolfi, Theo. 2022. “Populism as a Transgressive Style.” Global Studies Quarterly 2 (1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariza, Andrea., Valeria. March, and Sofia. Torres. 2023. “La comunicación política de Javier Milei en TikTok.” Intersecciones en Comunicación 2 (17): 6–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ben, Tobias. 2022. “La nueva derecha en Argentina: La obvia popularidad de la antipolítica.” Revista Disputas (2 (1): 104–112.Google Scholar
Bleiker, Roland and Emma. Hutchison. 2008. “Fear no more: Emotions and world politics.” Review of International Studies 34 (S1): 115–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breeze, Ruth. 2019. “Emotion in politics: Affective-discursive practices in UKIP and Labour.” Discourse and Society (30 (1): 24–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnham, C., and P. Kingsbury, eds. 2021. Lacan and the Environment. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burrell, M. 2022, October 31. “Just Stop Oil supporters spray paint onto MI5 building, Home Office.” Evening Standard. Accessed December 1, 2023. [URL].Google Scholar
Carpentier, Nico. 2019. “Enriching discourse theory: The discursivematerial knot as a non-hierarchical ontology.” Global Discourse (9 (2): 369–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casullo, María Esperanza. 2020. “Populism as synecdochal representation: Understanding the transgressive bodily performance of South American presidents.” Populism in Global Perspective. Routledge, 75–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chouliaraki, L., and Norman. Fairclough. 2022. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. 1st ed. London: University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. E. 2013. “The ‘New Materialism’ and the Fragility of Things.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies (41 (3): 399–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dean, Jonathan. 2019. “Sorted for Memes and Gifs: Visual Media and Everyday Digital Politics.” Political Studies Review, 17 (3), 255–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eklundh, Emmy. 2019. Emotions, protest, democracy—Collective identities in Contemporary Spain. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. “Excluding emotions: The performative function of populism.” Partecipazione e Conflitto (13 (1): 107–131.Google Scholar
Espindola, Ernesto. 2023. “Making presidential re-elections indefinite: a psychoanalytic contribution to the case of the Ecuadorian Citizens’ Revolution.” Journal of Psychosocial Studies (16 (1): 63–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fink, Bruce. 1997. The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Giménez, Sebastian. 2023. “1916 como frontera. Anti-radicalismo y democracia en el discurso de Javier Milei." Revista Argentina de Ciencia Política 31 (1): 95–118.Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason. 2008a. “Ideological fantasy at work.” Journal of Political Ideologies (13 (3): 275–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. "Self-Transgressive Enjoyment as a Freedom Fetter." Political Studies, 56(3), 679–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynos Jason. 2012. “Body, Discourse, and the Turn to Matter." In Language, Ideology, and the Human: New Interventions, edited by S. Bahun and D. Radunovic, 173–92. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Glynos, Jason. 2021. “Critical fantasy studies.” Journal of language and politics (20 (1): 95–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynos, Jason and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2008. “Lacan and political subjectivity: Fantasy and enjoyment in psychoanalysis and political theory." Subjectivity 241: 256–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gummenheim Bilbao (2024). “Ai Weiwei, Dropping a Han Dynasty Urn, 1995”, [URL].Google Scholar
Harman, Sophie, 2019. Seeing Politics: Film, Visual Method and International Relations, Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Hemmings, C. 2012. “Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation.” Feminist Theory (13 (2): 147–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hook, Derek. 2017. "What is ‘enjoyment as a political factor’?" Political Psychology 38 (4): 605–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horton, H. 2023, April 21. "Just Stop Oil protesters jailed for Dartford Crossing protest." The Guardian. Accessed December 1, 2023. [URL].Google Scholar
Jasper, James. M. 1998. “The emotions of protest: Affective and reactive emotions in and around social movements.” Sociological Forum (13 (3): 397–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juris, Jeffrey. 2008. “Performing politics: Image, embodiment, and affective solidarity during anti-corporate globalization protests”. Ethnography, Vol 9(1): 61–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Just Stop Oil. 2023, May 27. ““We’ve got to tackle this now!” — Just Stop Oil disrupt rugby final." Just Stop Oil. Accessed December 1, 2023. [URL].Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2004. "Glimpsing the future: A reply." In Laclau: A Critical Reader, edited by S. Critchley and O. Marchart, 279–328. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2005. On Populist Reason. Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Verso.Google Scholar
Makarychev, Andrey, George Spencer Terry and Sami Siva (2024), “Finno-Ugric Identity in Estonia: Visual and Discursive Analysis”, Nationalities Papers, 52 (2), pp. 251–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchart, Oliver (2018), Thinking antagonism: Political Ontology after Laclau, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martins, Maria. S. 2021. "Libertarios, redes y campaña electoral: el caso de Javier Milei en Instagram." Actas de Periodismo y Comunicación 7 (2).Google Scholar
Matthews, Daniel and Illan rua Wall. 2022. “Legal Aesthesis: Affect, Space and Encounter”. Law, Culture and the Humanities. Vol. 19(2), pp. 186–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller-Idriss, Cynthia. 2017. “Soldier, sailor, rebel, rule-breaker: Masculinity and the body in the German far right." Gender and Education 29 (2): 199–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ostiguy, Pierre., Francisco Panizza, and Benjamin Moffitt. 2021. Populism in a global perspective: A performative and discursive approach. Routledge.Google Scholar
"Police to be given clearer powers on slow-walk protests." 2023, June 13. BBC News. Accessed December 1, 2023. [URL].Google Scholar
Pulleiro, Adrian., and Carolina. Collazo. 2021. “Tras las huellas de una transgresión reaccionaria. Un análisis de los cambios en el discurso público en la Argentina reciente (2015–2021)." Revista Sociedad (431): 18–34.Google Scholar
Rojas-Andrés, Raul., Samuele Mazzolini, and Jacopo Custodi. 2023. “Does left populism short-circuit itself? Podemos in the labyrinths of cultural elitism and radical leftism." Journal of Contemporary European Studies: 1–18.Google Scholar
Ronderos, Sebastián 2021. “Hysteria in the squares: Approaching populism from a perspective of desire." Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 26 (1): 46–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ronderos, Sebastián and Jason Glynos. 2023. “Anti-populist fantasies: Interrogating Veja ’s discursive constructions, from Lula to Bolsonaro." Critical Discourse Studies 20 (6): 618–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salmela, Mikko and Christian von Scheve. 2017. “Emotional roots of right-wing political populism." Social Science Information 56 (4): 567–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (2007), The Concept of the Political , trans. George Schwab, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seco, Juan. B. 2021. "La casta, el point the caption primordial en la (re) significación del ellos de Javier Milei: Articulación, antagonismos y trazado de fronteras, en el debate electoral de Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires." Actas de Periodismo y Comunicación Social 7.Google Scholar
Skonieczny, Amy 2018. “Emotions and Political Narratives: Populism, Trump and Trade." Politics and Governance 6 (4): 62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, Lone 2021. “Populist Communication: Ideology, Performance, Mediation." Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2004. “Antinomies of Formalism: Laclau’s Theory of Populism and the Lessons from Religious Populism in Greece.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 253–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valentim, Vicente and Tobias Widmann. 2021. “Does Radical-Right Success Make the Political Debate More Negative? Evidence from Emotional Rhetoric in German State Parliaments." Political Behavior: 0123456789.Google Scholar
Venizelos, Giorgos. 2023. "Donald Trump in power: Discourse, performativity, identification." Critical Sociology 491.4–5: 647–667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widmann, Tobias 2021. “How Emotional Are Populists Really? Factors Explaining Emotional Appeals in the Communication of Political Parties." Political Psychology 42 (1): 163–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wirz, Daniele 2018. “Persuasion Through Emotion? An Experimental Test of the Emotion-Eliciting Nature of Populist Communication." International Journal of Communication 121: 25.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
. 1990. “Beyond discourse-analysis." New reflections on the revolution of our time 249–260.Google Scholar