Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 3:1 (2004) ► pp.81–116

“The spoilt children of Europe”

German press coverage of the Nice Treaty referenda in Ireland

Ireland’s rejection of the Nice Treaty in a referendum in June 2001 led to intense media discourse about this “no” vote and speculation about the outcome of the second referendum to ratify the Treaty in October 2002. The German media, traditionally positive in their portrayal of Ireland, were particularly critical, with the Irish electorate being characterised as anti-Eastern enlargement and Ireland recast in the role of “bad” European. This study of German press coverage of the two referenda points to a consensus in the negative representation of Ireland across all strands of media opinions and ideologies. The corpus of texts analysed also highlights the construction of a “them and us” divide between a morally superior in-group (the Germans) and a defective out-group (the Irish). Whilst much of the reporting still takes place within a received map of meaning (Hall et al. 1978), the established reference points are now used to de-legitimise Ireland’s role and to reassert Germany’s position as a “big” country within Europe in order to restore normal power relations.
Keywords: EU Enlargement, media discourse, political discourse, Nice Treaty, German-Irish relations, power relations
Published online: 27 May 2004
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.1.07kel
References (35)
References
Bolesch, Cornelia. 2002. Halbherziges als Zukunftschance: Der Vertrag von Nizza: Einigung auf den kleinsten gemeinsamen Nenner und Grundlage für eine große EU-Reform. Süddeutsche Zeitung (SzonNet), 21. October 2002.Google Scholar
Böll, Heinrich. 1988 (1957). Irisches Tagebuch. München: DTV.Google Scholar
Blome, Nikolaus. 2001. EU-Länder stellen Irland an den Pranger. Die Welt, 13. February 2001.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul and Ilyin, Mikhail. 1993. Metaphor in political discourse: The case of the “Common European House”. Discourse and Society 4(1), 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawshaw, Steve. 1996. Is Germany’s ship sinking? Independent on Sunday, 21. January 1996.Google Scholar
Elsasser, Martin. 1997. Germany and Ireland/Deutschland und Irland: 1000 Years Shared History/1000 Jahre gemeinsamer Geschichte. Dublin: Brookside.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
. 1989. Language and Power. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Online, Nicht nur die Iren haben Vorbehalte, 15. June 2001.
Fischer, Joachim. 1999. The bi-cultural classroom: More German-Irish experiences. In: Angela Chambers and Donal P. Ó Baoill Chambers (eds). Intercultural Communication and Language Learning. Dublin: IRAAL and the RIA, 135–148.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Paul. 1999. Bad time for public dispute with Flynn. The Irish Times, 30. January 1999.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart, Critcher, Chas, Jefferson, Tony, Clarke, John and Roberts, Brian. 1978. Policing the Crisis. Mugging, the State and Law and Order. London: MacMillan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herre, Sabine. 2001. Den Iren sei Dank. Die Tageszeitung online, 9. June 2001.Google Scholar
Holfter, Gisela. 1996. Erlebnis Irland: Deutsche Reiseberichte über Irland im zwanzigsten Jahrhundert. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft. 1996. Grüne Insel unter Euro-Dampf iwd 49(5), 7. December 1996.Google Scholar
Institute of European Affairs. 2002. The Nice Treaty: The 2002 Referendum Amendment. www.iiea.com
Kelly-Holmes, Helen. 2002. Innocence lost: Texts, economics and relocating German-Irish relations. Debatte 10(2), 179–199.Google Scholar
. 2000. There is a corner that is forever Munich. Advertising and Anglo-German Relations. Debatte 8(2), 39–54.Google Scholar
Klein, Stefan. Iren stimmen Erweiterung der Europäischen Union zu. Süddeutsche Zeitung (SzonNet), 21. October 2002.
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1990. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Middel, Andreas. 2001. EU verlangt mehr Disziplin von Irland. Die Welt, 8 February 2001.Google Scholar
. 2002. Plan B bei einem irischen Nein: Sollte das Votum negative ausfallen, gibt es Tricks, die Erweiterung zu retten. Die Welt online, 18. June 2002.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2000. Houses, Circles, and Trains that must not be Stopped. In: Barrie Axford, Daniela Berghahn and Nick Hewlett (eds). Unity and Diversity in the New Europe. Oxford, Bern etc.: Peter Lang, 371–384.Google Scholar
. 1996. False friends borrowing the right words? Common terms and metaphors in European communication. In: Andreas Musolff, Christina Schäffner and Michael Townson (eds). Conceiving of Europe: Diversity in Unity. Aldershot and Brookfield Vermont: Dartmouth, 15–30.Google Scholar
National Forum on Europe (NFE). 2002. Chairman’s Report: The First Phase of Work October 2001 to January 2002. www.forumoneurope.ie
Neuendorf, Kimberly A. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA. & London: Sage.Google Scholar
O’Regan, Veronica. Forthcoming. German-Swiss press representation of Ireland’s rejection of the Nice Treaty. In: Gisela Holfter and Marieke Krajenbrink (eds). Proceedings of the 3rd Limerick Conference of the Centre for Irish-German Studies, 4–6 April 2002. Oxford, Bern etc.: Peter Lang.
Potting, Christoph und Weweller, Annette. 1990. Anders reisen: Irland. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Rogers, John. 2001. Nice vote was a fundamental statement by the Irish people. Irish Times, 16. June 2001.Google Scholar
Runkel, Wolfram. 2001. Einfach, rau, wild: Donegal. Hoch im Norden ist die grüne insel noch so, wie ihre Fans sie lieben. Die Zeit, 29/2001.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina. 1996. Building a European house? Or at two speeds into a dead end? Metaphors in the Debate on the United Europe. In: Andreas Musolff, Christina Schäffner and Michael Townson (eds). Conceiving of Europe: Diversity in Unity. Aldershot and Brookfield Vermont: Dartmouth, 31–60.Google Scholar
Ulrich, Stefan. 2002. Der Europäische Traum. Süddeutsche Zeitung (SzonNet), 16. June 2002.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2001. Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 95–120.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Randour, François, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2020. Twenty years of research on political discourse: A systematic review and directions for future research. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
Matytsina, Marina Stanislavovna
2019. SEMANTIC-RHETORIC MEANS OF CONSTRUCTING A NEGATIVE ATTITUDE TO IMMIGRANTS (BY THE MATERIAL OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE). Philology. Theory & Practice 12:8 ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Costelloe, Laura
2014. Discourses of sameness: Expressions of nationalism in newspaper discourse on French urban violence in 2005. Discourse & Society 25:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Richardson, Kay P. & John Corner
2011. Sketchwriting, political “colour” and the sociolinguistics of stance. Journal of Language and Politics 10:2 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.