Casting the ‘Other’
Gender citizenship in politicians’ narratives
In the past century the presence of women in the “public sphere” has increased considerably as a result of, amongst other things, the rapid increase in their levels of schooling, professional competences and labour market participation. Much more limited and slower, by contrast, has been the entry of women into the centers of decision-making and power.
This paper proposes reflection on gender citizenship in political arenas, which are precisely those in which action to sensitize and change the broader social context should be undertaken. In order to understand and change gender models in the political-institutional system, analysis is required of how gender is defined and constructed in the specific arenas in which the political careers of individuals are planned and promoted.
The paper presents some findings of qualitative research which collected the narratives of men and women — belonging to different Italian political alignments and occupying different positions and roles — relative to their political career paths and the discourses with which they accounted for female under-representation. The analysis of the texts collected allowed light to be shed on the discursive practices, symbols, meanings and sexed images with which the symbolic gender order is created and reproduced. Highlighted in particular are the gender positioning performed through the narratives, and the tendency to cast women in the role of the “Other” with respect to the political system.
Viewed from this perspective, political arenas are theatrical stages on which gendered knowledge is created and disseminated. It is evident in particular that the symbolic order of gender and the models of the discursive construction of gender characteristic of the cultures analyzed tend to reproduce an image of political activity as a male preserve, where otherness entails marginalization and/or subordination.
References (31)
References
Alejandro, Roberto 1993. Hermeneutics, Citizenship, and the Public Sphere. New York: State University of New York Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, Walter E. 1990. Reality isn’t what it used to be. San Francisco: Harper & Row![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergvall, Victoria L., Bing, Janet M. and F. Freed, Alice (eds). 1996. Rethinking Language and Gender Research. Harlow: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhabha, Homi K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruner, Jerome. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruner, Jerome. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christie, Chris. 2002. Politeness and the linguistic construction of gender in parliament: An analysis of transgressions and apology behaviour. Working Papers on the Web, vol. 31, Special issues on Linguistic Politeness and Context. www.shu.ac.uk/wpw
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, Bronwyn. 1989. Frogs and Snails and Feminist Tales. North Sidney: Unwin Hyman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, Bronwyn and Harré, Rom. 1990. Positioning: The discursive Production of Selves. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour 11, 43–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Derrida, Jacques. 1976 (1967). Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fabbri, Donata and Formenti, Laura. 1991. Carte d’identitÃ, Milano: Angeli.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gavey, Nicola. 1997. Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. In: M.M. Gergen and S.N. Davis (eds). Toward a New Psychology of Gender. New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gherardi, Silvia. 1995. Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Culture. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, Janet and Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2003. The Handbook of Language and Gender. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyotard, Jean François. 1986 (1979). The Postmodern Condition. A report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mumby, Dennis K. 1988. Communication and Power in Organizations: Discourse, Ideology and Domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poggio, Barbara. 1999. Narrating challenges in organisational cultures, Paper presented at the 15th Egos Colloquium, Warwick, July 4–6.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Potter, Jonathan and Weatherall, Margaret. 1993. Analyzing Discourse, London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaw, Sylvia. 2000. Language, gender and floor apportionment in political debates. Discourse & Society 111, 401–418. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Suleri, Sara. 1992. The Rethoric of India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thornborrow, Joanna. 2002. Power Talk. Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Harlow: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Todd, Alexandra Dundas and Fisher, Sue (eds). 1988. Gender and Discourse: The Power of Talk, Norwood: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, Teun. 1985. Handbook of Discourse Analysis. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walsh, Clare. 1998. Gender and mediatized politicial discourse: A case study of press coverage of Margaret Beckett’s campaign for the Labour leadership in 1994. Language and Literature 71, 199–214. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walsh, Clare. 2001. Gender and Discourse. Language and Power in Politics, the Church and Organizations. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weatherall, Ann. 2002. Gender, Language and Discourse. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Witten, Marsha. 1993. Narrative and the culture of obedience at the Workplace. In: D.K. Mumby. Narrative and Social Control: Critical Perspectives. London: Sage. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth. 1996. Disorder of Discourse. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth. 1997. Gender and Discourse. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Poggio, Barbara
2022.
Working for Gender Equality in the Neoliberal Academia: Between Theory and Practice.
Revista de Administração Contemporânea 26: suppl 1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Poggio, Barbara
2022.
Trabalhando pela Igualdade de Gênero na Academia Neoliberal: Entre a Teoria e a Prática.
Revista de Administração Contemporânea 26: suppl 1
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.