Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 4:2 (2005) ► pp.293–330

Ideology and affect in discourse in institutions

| University of Melbourne
This paper explores the discursive relationships of power, ideology, and affect that are instituted — and reproduced, resisted, or modified — in the functional pragmatics of talkback radio. In particular, I develop a critical analysis of the psychodynamics of subjectivity based on a case study of talkback in Northern Ireland in which the main topic of discussion deals with community responses to the Drumcree Protestant church parade. The functional pragmatics approach builds on the contributions of critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis to the study of ideology and affect in discourse in institutions. I develop a wider context for the analysis of discourse in the talkback institution by addressing the meta-linguistic implications of talk about talk through cognitive-developmental paradigms and psychoanalytic social theory. It is anticipated that such a motivated analysis will reveal the emancipatory interests concealed within ideologically bound — while not necessarily moribund — institutional frameworks of communicative action.
Keywords: discourse, talkback, institutions, Northern Ireland, conflict, ideology, affect, psychoanalytic social theory
Published online: 5 October 2005
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.07war
References (33)
References
Althusser, Louis. 1971. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In: Louis Althusser. Lenin and Philosophy. New York: Monthly Review Press, 127–186.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Jay M. 1995. Recovering Ethical Life: Jürgen Habermas and the Future of Critical Theory. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1999. Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society 10(4), 543–558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cash, John D. 1989. Ideology and affect: The case of Northern Ireland. Political Psychology 10(4), 703–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Identity, Ideology and Conflict: The Structuration of Politics in Northern Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. The dilemmas of political transformation in Northern Ireland. Pacifica Review 10(3), 227–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad. 1993. HIAT — A transcription system for discourse data. In: Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert (eds.) Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum, 123–148.Google Scholar
. 1995. Functional-Pragmatic Communication Analysis: Goals and Processes. München: Institut für Deutsch als Fremdsprache. (Mimeo). Google Scholar
. 1999. Funktionale Pragmatik: Terme, Themen und Methoden. Deutschunterricht in Japan 41, 4–24Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad and Joachim Rehbein. 1976. Halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen (HIAT). Linguistische Berichte 451, 21–41.Google Scholar
Ekstein, Rudolf. 1988. Karl Bühler’s Sprachtheorie in psychoanalytic perspective. In: Achim Eschbach (ed.). Karl Bühler’s Theory of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 3–15.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1976. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1979 [1909]. Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis (The ‘Rat Man’). In: Sigmund Freud. Case Histories II. Trans. James Strachey. London: Pelican, 36–128.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1976. Replies and responses. Language in Society 5(3), 257–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. Contextualisation and understanding. In: Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin (eds.) Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229–252.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1970. Towards a theory of communicative competence. Inquiry 13(4), 360–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1972. Self-reflection as science: Freud’s psychoanalytic critique of meaning. In: Jürgen Habermas. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press, 214–245.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Heritage John. 1984. Conversation analysis. In: John Heritage. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 233–292.Google Scholar
Hodge, Robert and Kress, Gunther. 1988. Social Semiotics. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hollway, Wendy. 1984. Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In: Julian Henriques, Wendy Hollway, Cathy Urwin, Couze Venn, and Valerie Walkerdine (eds.) Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity. London: Methuen, 227–260.Google Scholar
Jaques, Elliott. 1955. Social systems as a defence against persecutory and depressive anxiety. In: Melanie Klein, Paula Heimann, and Roger E. Money-Kyrle (eds.) New Directions in Psychoanalysis. London: Tavistock Publications, 478–498.Google Scholar
Klein, Melanie. 1988 [1959]. Our adult world and its roots in infancy. In: Melanie Klein. Envy and Gratitude. London: Virago, 247–263.Google Scholar
Laver, John. 1981. Linguistic routines and politeness in greeting and parting. In: Florian Coulmas (ed.). Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton, 289–304.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menzies Lyth, Isabel. 1988 [1959]. The functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety. In: Isabel Menzies Lyth. Containing Anxiety in Institutions. London: Free Associations, 43–81.Google Scholar
Rehbein, Joachim. 1981. Announcing — On formulating plans. In: Florian Coulmas (ed.). Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton, 215–256.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel A. 1987. Analysing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly 50(2), 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 1996. Disorders of Discourse. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin N. 1994 [1929]. Marxism and the philosophy of Language. In: Pam Morris (ed.). The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, and Voloshinov. London, New York: Edward Arnold, 51–61.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Bednarek, Monika
2014. Involvement in Australian Talkback Radio—A Corpus Linguistic Investigation. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34:1 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.