Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 4:3 (2005) ► pp.421–442

True Colors of Japanese Prime Ministers

A linguistic approach to political profiling

| University of Arkansas
Recent studies on the Japanese conjunction ga revealed its pragmatic and discourse functions in detailed forms and found their implications for discourse settings. In particular, two variation analyses of ga in public speeches of two prominent Japanese political figures suggested their attempts to project certain sociopolitical images. However, data from individuals in two unparallel setting types and misattribution of the addressers’ sociopolitical considerations prevented these studies from substantiating a connection between the observed ga variations to the addressers’ sociopolitical images. This study analyzes ga occurrences in domestic and international press conferences with three Japanese prime ministers to evaluate the relevance between ga occurrences and their sociopolitical implications. This study finds that ga frequencies in domestic press conferences suggest the prime ministers’ attempts in varying degrees to craft an image of a consensus builder, which would appeal to key members of their party. On the other hand, the study observes different patterns of ga frequencies in international press conferences, which suggest their attempts in varying degrees to present their true colors to the general public.
Keywords: conjunction ga , pragmatics, discourse marker, discourse connective, political discourse, Japanese politics, Japanese prime minister, Japanese language
Published online: 21 March 2006
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.3.05fuk
References (36)
References
Alfonso, Anthony. 1992. Japanese Language Patterns: A Structural Approach. (vol. 11). Tokyo: Sophia University L. L. Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In: Thomas A. Sebook(ed.). Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 253–76.Google Scholar
Chino, Noriko. 1999. The function of the passive voice in the Japanese Constitution: Chapter 1 “The Emperor.” Language & Communication 191, 387–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cox, James. 1998 (December 19). Experts: Japan’s leaders will change little. USA Today. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/nws37.htm
Curtis, Gerald L. 1999. The Logic of Japanese Politics: Leaders, Institutions, and the Limits of Change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan. 2002. Phraseological units in parliamentary discourse. In: Paul A. Chilton (ed.). Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins, 81–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farrell, William R. 1999. Crisis and Opportunity in a Changing Japan. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Tatsuya. 2000. Japanese Conjunctive ga: Its Discourse Functions and Variation. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI.Google Scholar
. 2005. Japanese continuative conjunction ga as a semantic boundary marker. Language & Communication 251, 81–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayao, Kenji. 1993. The Japanese Prime Minister and Public Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendry, Joy. 1995. Understanding Japanese Society (2nd edition). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoshi, Hiroshi. 1998. Precarious prospects for the Obuchi cabinet. Japan Quarterly 45(4), 4–9.Google Scholar
Iwao, Sumiko. 2001 (June). From the editor. Japan Echo 28(3), 2–4.Google Scholar
Japan’s next prime minister? 1995 (September 23). Economist 3361, 25.Google Scholar
Kawachi, Takashi. 2001. Koizumi who? Japan Echo 28(4), 12.Google Scholar
Kempf, Renate. 1985. Pronouns and terms of address in Neues Deutschland . Language in Society 14(2), 223–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khergamvala, F. J 1998 (July 25). Consensus builder Obuchi to be next premier. The Hindu. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.webpage.com/hindu/daily/980725/03/03250004.htm
Kruger, David. 2001. Change the LDP! Change Japan. Far Eastern Economic Review 164(17), 14–16.Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua. 2002. From solidarity to antagonism: The uses of the second-person singular pronoun in Chinese political discourse. Text 22(1), 29–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meet the prime minister: a biography of Obuchi Keizo. 2000. Look Japan 451, 12–15.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster’s Japanese English Learner’s Dictionary. 1993. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc.Google Scholar
Mizutani, Osamu and Mizutani, Nobuko. 1987. How to be Polite in Japanese. Tokyo: The Japan Times, Ltd.Google Scholar
Moffett, Sebastian. 1996. The vision thing: Japan needs change. Can Hashimoto provide it? Far Eastern Economic Review 159(42), 22–6.
Nagano, Ken. 1951. Gendai-go no Joshi Jodōshi [Particles and Auxiliaries in Modern Japanese]. Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo Hōkoku [Reports to the National Language Research Center] 3. Tokyo: Shueisha.Google Scholar
Nakane, Chie. 1970. Japanese Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ogden, Christopher. 1998 (October 5). Dangerously small talk: The fruitless Clinton-Obuchi meeting symbolizes a sick relationship. TIMEasia.com. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.time.com/time/asia/asia/magazine/1998/981005/japan_ogden.html
Ono, Susumu. 1999. Nihongo Renshū-chō [Japanese Workbook]. Tokyo: Iwanami Press.Google Scholar
Sakamaki, Sachiko. 1995. Man of the hour: Ryutaro Hashimoto takes the LDP’s helm. Far Eastern Economic Review 158(40), 18.Google Scholar
Schoppa, Leonard J.2001. Japan, the reluctant reformer. Foreign Affairs 80(5), 76–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, Ikutaro. 1959. Ronbun no Kakikata [Techniques to Write Reports]. Tokyo: Iwanami Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Patrick. 1997. Japan: A Reinterpretation. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Taro. 1960. Bun no tochū de no kiri-kata [How to divide sentence at the middle]. In: Etsutaro Iwabuchi (ed.). Akubun [Bad Sentences]. Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha, 95–115.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Akira. 1987. Some characteristics of the Japanese way of communication. In: D. Lawrence Kincaid (ed.). Communication Theory: Eastern and Western Perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 115–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walther, Joseph B. 1994. Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research 201, 473–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weltman, David. 2003. The pragmatics of peremptory assertion: An ideological analysis of the use of the word ‘just’ in local politicians’ denials of politics. Discourse & Society 14(3), 349–73.Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 1990. Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Tanaka, Lidia
2021. Japanese politicians’ questions in parliament. In Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 323], ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Halmari, Helena
2008. On the language of the Clinton-Dole presidential campaign debates. Journal of Language and Politics 7:2 ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.