Article published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 4:3 (2005) ► pp.443–463
The institutional provision for silence
On the evasive nature of politicians’ answers to reporters’ questions
This paper explores how what is both appropriate to and excluded from consideration in a given episode of talk involving question-and-answers between a speaker and audience is the outcome of complex negotiation. We consider the details of such collaborative work in talk at a press conference with the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, in discussion concerning his own and other countries’ military involvement in the Middle East. What gets excluded from consideration in the talk is itself established in dialogic interaction where the problematic nature of inferences potentially made relevant to the discussion is highlighted by reporters and brought to account by the Prime Minister. This feature of dialogue is related to recent scholarly debate regarding the place that context of controversy and the implicit availability of meaning should play in an analysis of talk, where what does not get said features as of equal importance as what does get said. We explore how the questions at issue in just such debates get taken up as participant concerns, pursued as a practical order of business in efforts where principal speakers work to foreclose the inferential potential otherwise opened up by audience scrutiny.
Keywords: dialogue, context, collaboration, evasive rhetoric, social structure
References (46)
Atkinson, J. M. and Drew, P. 1979. Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan. 
Bakhtin, M. M 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. (Ed.). C. Emerson, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
1984. Problems of Dostoyevsky’s Poetics. (Ed.). and trans. C. Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Billig, M. 1985. Prejudice, categorisation and particularisation: From a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology 151, 79–103.
. 1992. Talking of the Royal Family. London: Routledge.
. 1996. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology, new edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 1999a. Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society 10(4), 543–582.
. 1999b. Conversation analysis and the claims of naivety. Discourse & Society 10(4), 571–576.
Brockmeier, J. and Harré, R. 1997. Narrative: Problems and promises of an alternative paradigm. Research on Language and Social Interaction 341, 263–283.
Bull, P. 1994. On identifying questions, replies and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 131, 115–131.
Clark, K. and Holquist, M. 1984. Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Clayman, S. and Whalen, J. 1988. When the medium becomes the message: The case of the Rather-Bush encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction 221, 214–272.
Edmondson, W. 1981. Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.
Edwards, D. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
Foucault, M. 1980. The eye of power. In: C. Gordon (ed.). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books, 146–165.
Galasinski, D. 2000. The Language of Deception: A Discourse Analytical Study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. (Ed.). A. Rawls. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Gergen, K. J 1982. Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Holquist, M. 1990. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. London: Routledge.
Hopkins, N., Reicher, S. and Levine, M. 1997. On the parallels between social cognition and the ‘New Racism’. British Journal of Social Psychology 361, 305–329.
Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. 1998. Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jefferson, G. 1985. An Exercise in the Transcription and Analysis of Laughter. In: T. A. van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. III: Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press, 25–34.
Latour, B. 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry 301, 225–247.
Lynch, M. and Bogen, D. 1996. The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
McKenzie, K. 2003. Discursive Psychology and the ‘New Racism’. Human Studies 261, 461–491.
Mehan, H. and Wood, H. 1975. The Reality of Ethnomethodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mey, J. 1985. Whose Language: A Study in Linguistic Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Morson, G. S and Emerson, C. 1990. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A and Jefferson, G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4), 696–735.
Schegloff, E. A 1988. From interview to confrontation: Observations of the Bush/Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction 221, 215–240.
1992. On talk and its institutional occasions. In: P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–134.
1997. Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society 8(2), 165–187.
1998. Reply to Wetherell [1998]. Discourse & Society 9(3), 413–416.
1999a. ‘Schegloff ’s texts’ as ‘Billig’s data’: A critical reply. Discourse & Society 10(4), 58–72.
1999b. Naivete vs. sophistocation or discipline vs. self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig [1999b]. Discourse & Society 10(4), 577–582.
Schwartz, H. 1971. Mental Disorder and the Study of Subjective Experience: Some Uses of Each to Elucidate the Other. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
. (n.d.. )Towards a Phenomenology of Projection Errors. Unpublished paper. Department of Sociology, Harvard University.
Sharrock, W. and Anderson, R. J. 1987. Epilogue: The definition of alternatives: Some sources of confusion in interdisciplinary discussion. In: G. Button and R. E. Lee, Talk and Social Organisation. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters Ltd., 290–321.
Sharrock, W. and Button, G. 1991. The social actor: Social action in real time. In: G. Button (ed.). Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–175.
Shotter, J. and Billig, M. 1998. A Bakhtinian psychology: From out of the heads of individuals and into the dialogues between them. In: M. M. Bell and M. Gardiner (eds). Bakhtin and the Human Sciences: No Last Words. London: Sage, 13–29.
Tsuda, Y. 1986. Language, Inequality and Distortion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wetherell, M. 1998. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society 9(3), 387–412.
. 2001. Debates in Discourse Research. In: M. Wetherell, S. Taylor and S. J. Yates (eds). Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage, 380–399.
Wowk, M. T. and Carlin, A. P 2004. Depicting a liminal position in ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and membership categorization analysis: The work of Rod Watson. Human Studies 27(1), 69–89.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Ikeanyibe, Okey Marcellus, Christian Chukwuebuka Ezeibe, Peter Oluchukwu Mbah & Chikodiri Nwangwu
McKenzie, Kevin
2016. Invoking the Specter of Racism: Category Membership as Speaker Topic and Resource. Qualitative Sociology Review 12:3 ► pp. 44 ff. 
Schröter, Melani & Petra Storjohann
Braman, Sandra
2007. When Nightingales Break the Law: Silence and the Construction of Reality. Ethics and Information Technology 9:4 ► pp. 281 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.