Discussion published In:
Journal of Language and PoliticsVol. 6:3 (2007) ► pp.459–474
Discussion
Reframing Moral Politics
References
Bai, Matt
The framing wars. The New York Times, July 17, 2005; http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/38/12727.
Billig, Michael
2003 Critical discourse analysis and the rhetoric of critique. In: Gilbert Weiss and Ruth Wodak. (eds) 2003 Critical Discourse Analysis. NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
bar-Lev, Zev
2007 Mrs. Goldberg’s rebuttal of Butt et al. Discourse & Society 18 (2), 183–196. 
Boyer, Pascal
2001 Religion Explained. NY: Basic Books.
Butt, David, Lukin, Annabelle and Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M
2004 Grammar — The first covert operation of war. Discourse & Society 15(2—3), 267–290.
Charen, Mona
2004 Do-Gooders. NY: Penguin.
Chilton, Paul
2002 Do something! Conceptualising responses to the attacks of 11 September 2001. Journal of Language & Politics 1 (1), 366–378.
Collier, Peter and Horowitz, David
(eds) 2004 The Anti-Chomsky Reader. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
Dalrymple, Theodore
2001 Life at the Bottom: The Worldview of the Underclass. Chicago: Ivan Dees.
de Bray, R.G.A
(Ed 1963 Guide to the Slavonic Langauges. London: J.M. Dent.
Flynn, Daniel J
2005 Intellectual Morons. NY: Crown Forum.
Greene, Jay P
2005 Education Myths. Lanham Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hayes, Stephen
2004 The Connection : How al Qaeda’s Collaboration with Saddam Hussein Has Endangered America. Harper Collins.
Jastrow, Robert
1992 God and the Astronomers. Toronto: Readers Library.
Johnson, Paul
1988 Intellectuals. NY: Harper & Row.
Kress, Gunther
1985 Ideological structures in discourse. In::Teun A. van Dijk (Ed) 1985 Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 4: Discourse Analysis in Society. London: Academic press, 27–42.
Kurtz, Howard
2005 College faculties a most liberal lot, study finds. Washington Post, Tuesday, March 29.
Lakoff, George
2002 Moral Politics. Chicago: U. Chicago.
2004 Don’t Think of an Elephant. White River Junction VT: Chelsea Green Publ.
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark
1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: U. Chicago Press.
Lindzen, Richard S
undated. http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/reg15n2g.html
Lomborg, Bjorn
2001 The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. NY: Cambridge U. Press.
Miniter, Richard
2005 Disinformation. Washington DC: Regnery.
Sayer, Andrew
2006 Language and significance — or the importance of import: Implications for critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language & Politics 5 (3), 449–471.
Values and strategies of argumentation in politics and social science. Manuscript.
Schweizer, Peter
2005 Do As I Say (Not as I Do). NY: Doubleday.
Stossel, John
2006 Myths, Lies, and Downright Stupidity. New York: Hyperion.
van Dijk, Teun A
1997 The study of discourse. In: Teun A. van Dijk (Ed) 1997 Discourse as Structure and Process. London: SAGE Publication.
1998 Opinions and ideologies in the press. In: Allen Bell and Peter Garrett (eds). 1998. Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell, 31–63.
Widdowson, H.G
2004 Text, Context, Pretext. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Wodak, Ruth
2005 Understanding and explaining social change: ‘Déjà-vu’ experiences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (2), 240–243.
2006 Mediation between discourse and society — Assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. Discourse Studies, Special Issue, Teun van Dijk (Ed.), 179–190.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Feinberg, Matthew, Elisabeth Wehling & Daniel Wisneski
2018. A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition. PLOS ONE 13:4 ► pp. e0193347 ff. 
Knackmuhs, Eric, James Farmer & Doug Knapp
2020. The Interaction of Policy Narratives, Moral Politics, and Criminal Justice Policy Beliefs. Politics & Policy 48:2 ► pp. 288 ff.
Ohl, Jessy J., Damien S. Pfister, Martin Nader & Dana Griffin
2013. Lakoff's Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952–2012. Communication Studies 64:5 ► pp. 488 ff.
Renardel de Lavalette, Kiki Y., Gerard Steen & Christian Burgers
2019. How to identify moral language in presidential speeches: A comparison between a social-psychological and a cognitive-linguistic approach to corpus analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 15:2 ► pp. 239 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.