Discussion published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 6:3 (2007) ► pp.459474
References (32)
References
Bai, Matt. The framing wars. The New York Times, July 17, 2005; http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/38/12727.
Billig, Michael. 2003. Critical discourse analysis and the rhetoric of critique. In: Gilbert Weiss and Ruth Wodak. (eds). 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis. NY: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
bar-Lev, Zev. 2007. Mrs. Goldberg’s rebuttal of Butt et al. Discourse & Society 18 (2), 183–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion Explained. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Butt, David, Lukin, Annabelle and Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 2004. Grammar — The first covert operation of war. Discourse & Society 15(2—3), 267–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charen, Mona. 2004. Do-Gooders. NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2002. Do something! Conceptualising responses to the attacks of 11 September 2001. Journal of Language & Politics 1 (1), 366–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collier, Peter and Horowitz, David (eds). 2004. The Anti-Chomsky Reader. San Francisco: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Theodore. 2001. Life at the Bottom: The Worldview of the Underclass. Chicago: Ivan Dees.Google Scholar
de Bray, R.G.A. (Ed.). 1963. Guide to the Slavonic Langauges. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
Flynn, Daniel J. 2005. Intellectual Morons. NY: Crown Forum.Google Scholar
Greene, Jay P. 2005. Education Myths. Lanham Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hayes, Stephen. 2004. The Connection : How al Qaeda’s Collaboration with Saddam Hussein Has Endangered America. Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Jastrow, Robert. 1992. God and the Astronomers. Toronto: Readers Library.Google Scholar
Johnson, Paul. 1988. Intellectuals. NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 1985. Ideological structures in discourse. In::Teun A. van Dijk (Ed.). 1985. Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 4: Discourse Analysis in Society. London: Academic press, 27–42.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Howard. 2005. College faculties a most liberal lot, study finds. Washington Post, Tuesday, March 29.
Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics. Chicago: U. Chicago. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant. White River Junction VT: Chelsea Green Publ.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: U. Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindzen, Richard S. undated. http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/reg15n2g.html
Lomborg, Bjorn. 2001. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. NY: Cambridge U. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miniter, Richard. 2005. Disinformation. Washington DC: Regnery.Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew. 2006. Language and significance — or the importance of import: Implications for critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language & Politics 5 (3), 449–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Values and strategies of argumentation in politics and social science. Manuscript.
Schweizer, Peter. 2005. Do As I Say (Not as I Do). NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Stossel, John. 2006. Myths, Lies, and Downright Stupidity. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. The study of discourse. In: Teun A. van Dijk (Ed.). 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process. London: SAGE Publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Opinions and ideologies in the press. In: Allen Bell and Peter Garrett (eds). 1998. Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell, 31–63.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G. 2004. Text, Context, Pretext. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2005. Understanding and explaining social change: ‘Déjà-vu’ experiences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (2), 240–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Mediation between discourse and society — Assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. Discourse Studies, Special Issue, Teun van Dijk (Ed.), 179–190.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Knackmuhs, Eric, James Farmer & Doug Knapp
2020. The Interaction of Policy Narratives, Moral Politics, and Criminal Justice Policy Beliefs. Politics & Policy 48:2  pp. 288 ff. DOI logo
Renardel de Lavalette, Kiki Y., Gerard Steen & Christian Burgers
2019. How to identify moral language in presidential speeches: A comparison between a social-psychological and a cognitive-linguistic approach to corpus analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 15:2  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Feinberg, Matthew, Elisabeth Wehling & Daniel Wisneski
2018. A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition. PLOS ONE 13:4  pp. e0193347 ff. DOI logo
Ohl, Jessy J., Damien S. Pfister, Martin Nader & Dana Griffin
2013. Lakoff's Theory of Moral Reasoning in Presidential Campaign Advertisements, 1952–2012. Communication Studies 64:5  pp. 488 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.