Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 7:1 (2008) ► pp.53–70

Language as social practice

Persian newspapers in post-revolutionary Iran

| Department of linguisticsUniversity of Isfahan
This paper aims to investigate the language used by newspapers in post-revolutionary Iran. More precisely, the paper sets out to analyze how such a language is deployed to represent relevant hegemonic ideologies. The approach adopted for this purpose draws inspiration mainly from critical linguistics, where it is hypothesized that, as far as the pertinent metadiscourse goes, media genres serve to activate and perpetuate social power relations. In keeping with this theoretical stance, the paper argues that socially constructed texts can be said to perform two complementary functions; on the one hand, they shed light on the realities experienced in social life; on the other, they reveal such aspects of those realities as are constructed through the use of language. It is thus in this context that the media language used in the post-revolutionary Iran lends itself to analytical investigation, where the available data reveal the co-existence of three competing discourse processes of ‘Islamization’, ‘Iranian Nationalism’ and ‘Western liberalism’, relating to the third stage development of post-revolutionary Iran.
Keywords: ideology, Islamization, economic reconstruction, political reforms, competing discourses, topicalization, semantic borrowing
Published online: 26 May 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.1.03amo
References (25)
References
Amouzadeh M. 2002. Social realities in Persian advertising. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 121, 179—209.Google Scholar
. 2003. Symbolic value of English Language in Persian Advertising. International Journal of Communication 131, 197—222.Google Scholar
Amouzadeh M. & Tavangar M. 2004. Decoding pictorial metaphors: Ideologies in Persian advertisements. International Journal of Cultural Studies 7(2), 147—174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Sociolinguistic aspects of Persian advertising in the post-revolutionary Iran. In: Mehdi Sameti. (Ed.). Media, Culture, and Society in Iran: Living with Globalization and the Islamic State. London: Routledge, 130—151.Google Scholar
Berger P. & Luckmann T. 1976. The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fairclough N. 2001. Language and Power. 2nd Edition. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Fairclough N. & Wodak, R. 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In: T.A. van Dijk. (Ed.). Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 65—84.Google Scholar
Fay B. 1996. Contemporary Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fowler R. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler R., Hodge G. & Kress, G 1979. Language and Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday M.A.K. 1993. Language in a changing world. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia. Occasional Paper Number 13.
Hartley J. 1982. Understanding News. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
House J. 2004. Explicitness in discourse across languages. In: J. House, W. Koller & K. Schubert. (eds). Neue Perspektiven in der Übesetzungs und Dolmetschwissenschaft. Festschrift für Heidi Gerzymisch-Arbogast. Bochum: AKS Verlag, 185—208.Google Scholar
Keshavarz M.H. 1988. Forms of address in Post-revolutionary Iranian Persian. Language in Society 171, 565—575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress G. & Hodge, B. 1993. Language as Ideology. 2nd Edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress G. 1989. Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald K. 1991. Cultural innovation and economic modernization: The context of language education today. In: Frances Christie. (Ed.). Teaching English Literacy. Vol. 21. Darwin: Centre for Studies of Language in Education, 1—16.Google Scholar
Sapir E. 1949. Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality. Edited by David G. Mamdelbaum. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk T.A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 1991. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2006. Politics, ideology, and discourse. In: Keith Brown. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 91. Amsterdam and Boston: Elsevier, 728—740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whorf B.L. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality. Edited by John B. Carrol. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wodak R. & Busch B. 2004. Approaches to media texts. In: John D. Dowing, Denis McQuail, Philip Scchlesinger and Ellen Wartella. (eds). The Sage Handbook to Media Studies. London: Sage, 105—123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak R. & de Cillia R. 2006. ‘Politics and language: Overview. In: Keith Brown. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 91. Amsterdam and Boston: Elsevier, 707—719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Abasi, Ali R. & Nahal Akbari
2013. The discoursal construction of candidates in the tenth Iranian presidential elections. Journal of Language and Politics 12:4 ► pp. 537 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.