Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 7:1 (2008) ► pp.71–98

A political action against popular opinion

Aznar’s final speech before the Spanish Parliament justifying the war in Iraq (December 2003)

| University of Valladolid
This paper analyses the last speech delivered in the Spanish Parliament (on 2 December 2003) by President Aznar, in which he attempts to discursively uphold the reasons for his decision to support Bushs Administration (although with a small number of troops), and prove his interpretation of events. This speech is the richest in symbolism: it was made after the end of the war and no weapons of mass destruction were found, and also because it took place several hours after the funeral service for seven Spanish intelligence agents, murdered in Iraq.
Our theoretical and methodological background is an eclectic position based on different approaches such as Critical Discourse Analysis, International Sociolinguistics, and Rhetoric (mainly a theory of argumentation), among others. However, in order to analyse a particular type of discourse, it is the text itself which guides the direction of this analysis and leads us to rely to a greater or lesser extent on a specific theoretical or methodological approach.
The analysis reveals that Aznar builds three ideological meanings (or frames) in order to justify his ideological positioning given the socio-political situation of the moment: (1) Terrorism currently represents a global threat of which ETA is just one of many examples; (2) The mission carried out by Spanish troops in Iraq is part of a universal mission, led by the United Nations; and (3) The Partido Popular Government has the clearest insight into our destiny as a nation, and will lead us unequivocally towards it (the return to Spanish nationalism).
Keywords: political discourse analysis, political strategies, rhetorical discourse, parliamentary discourse
Published online: 26 May 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.1.04puj
References (57)
References
Aranguren, José Luis. 1985. Etica y Pol�tica. Madrid: Ediciones Orbis, S.A.Google Scholar
Beristáin, Helena. 1992. Diccionario de Retórica y Poética. México: Porrúa.Google Scholar
Bernárdez, Enrique. 1995. Teor�a y Epistemolog�a del Texto. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borel, M.-J., Grize, Jean-Blaise & Miéville, D. (eds). 1983. Essai de Logique Naturelle. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. In other Words. Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick & Maingueneau, Dominique. 2005. Diccionario de Análisis del Discurso. Buenos Aires-Madrid: Amorrortu editores.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul A. and Schäffner, Christina (eds). Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cortés-Rodr�guez, Luis & Camacho-Adarve, Mar�a M. 2003. �Qué es el Análisis del Discurso? Barcelona: Octaedro.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1997. Antropolog�a Lingü�stica. Madrid: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 1991. Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1985. Critical and descriptive goals in Discourse Analysis. In: Michael Toolan (Ed.). 2002. Critical Discourse Analysis, 4 vols1. London: Routledge, 321—345.Google Scholar
. 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1994. Estrategias de Poder, 21 vol. Barcelona: Paidós. [Original title: Dits et écrits].Google Scholar
Grize, Jean-Blaise. 1990. Logique et Langage, Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Interactional Sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In: Deborah Schiffrin et al.. The Handbook of Discouse Analysis. London: Blackwell, 215—228.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Teor�a de la Acción Comunicativa, Vol. I1. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
. 2002. Verdad y Justificación. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
Halliday, Max A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
. 2002. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metáforas de la Vida Cotidiana. Madrid: Cátedra, 1986.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1975. Manual de Retórica Literaria. Fundamentos de una Ciencia de la Literatura, 31 vols. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
López-Eire, Antonio. 2003. Los Or�genes Filosóficos de la Retórica. Monteagudo. Retórica y discurso 3(8), 13—26.Google Scholar
Maingueneau, Dominique. 1991. L’Analyse du Discours. Introduction aux Lectures de l’Archive. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Marchese, Angelo and Forradellas, Joaqu�n. 1989. Diccionario de Retórica, Cr�tica y Terminolog�a Literaria. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Morales-López, Esperanza. 2000. Election interviews in the Spanish political campaign of 1996: Strategies for building discursive credibility. In: Héctor Campos et al.. (eds). Hispanic Linguistics at the Turn of the Millenium: Papers from the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (Georgetown University, 1999). Somerville: Cascadilla Press, 322—351.Google Scholar
Morales-López, Esperanza and Prego-Vázquez, Gabriela. 2002. Entrevistas Electorales en las Campañas Pol�ticas para la Presidencia del Gobierno de 1996 y 2000. Oralia 51, 203—245.Google Scholar
Morales-López, Esperanza, Prego-Vázquez, Gabriela and Dom�nguez-Seco, Luzia. 2005. Interviews between employees and customers during the process of restructuring a company. Discourse and Society 16(2), 225—268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie 1989. Tratado de la Argumentación. La Nueva Retórica. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Plantin, Christian. 1996. L’argumentation. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Pujante, David. 2003. Manual de Retórica. Madrid: Castalia.Google Scholar
Pujante, David and Morales-López, Esperanza. 1996—7. El Discurso Pol�tico en la Actual Democracia Española. Discurso (UNAM, México, DF) 21(22), 39—75.Google Scholar
Pujante, David & Morales-López, Esperanza. 2003. Intervención del L�der de la Oposición Josep Borrell durante el Debate sobre el Estado de la Nación Española de 1998: Análisis de un Discurso Fracasado. Monteagudo, 3� época (University of Murcia, Spain), 81: 107—160.Google Scholar
Quintilian, Marco Fabio. 1970. Institutionis Oratoriae Libri Duodecim, 21 vols. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin & Wodak, Ruth. 2000. Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.B. 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Toolan, Michael 2002. Critical Discourse Analysis, 41 vols. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen E. 1994. Les Usages de l’Argumentation, Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen E., Rieke, Richard & Janik, Alan. 1984. An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain. 1994. �Qué es la Democracia? Madrid: Temas de Hoy.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2002. Political Discourse and Political Cognition. In: Chilton, Paul A. and Schäffner, Christina, eds. Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic approaches to Political Discourse, 203—237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Ideolog�a y Discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
. 2004. La Retórica Belicista de un Aliado Menor. Implicaturas Pol�ticas y la Legitimización de la Guerra contra Irak por Aznar, Oralia 71, 195—225.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans and Grootendorst, Rob. 1992. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 1996. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 1996a. La Nouvelle Dialectique. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Vignaux, Georges. 1988. Le Discours, Acteur du Monde. Argumentation et Enonciation. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin N. 1929. El Marxismo y la Filosof�a del Lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1992.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G. 2004. Text, Context, Pretext. Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Malden, Ma.: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2000. �La Sociolingü�stica Necesita una Teor�a Social? Nuevas Perspectivas en el Análisis Cr�tico del Discurso. Discurso y Sociedad (2/3), 123—147.Google Scholar
. 2002. Fragmented identities. Redefining and recontextualizing National Identity. In: Paul A. Chilton and Christina Schäffner (eds). Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143—169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
et al.. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Mochtak, Michal & Ensar Muharemović
2024. The Abyss of Ethnic Division: Two Decades of Discussing War in the Parliament of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Ethnopolitics 23:2 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Alsina, Adrià, Xavier Ginesta & Jordi de San Eugenio
2023. The Downfall of the Catalan Rebellion: A Graphic Representation of Secessionist Political Discourses. American Behavioral Scientist 67:6 ► pp. 757 ff. DOI logo
Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid & Mahdieh Noori
2019. Discursive portrayal of Islam as “a part of America’s story” in Obama’s presidential speeches. Journal of Language and Politics 18:6 ► pp. 915 ff. DOI logo
Atkinson, David & Cinta Ramblado
2018. Democratic credentials and the ‘other(s)’ in the discourse of the SpanishPartido Popular,1977–2015. Journal of Language and Politics 17:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Coesemans, Roel & Barbara De Cock
2017. Self-reference by politicians on Twitter: Strategies to adapt to 140 characters. Journal of Pragmatics 116 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
De Cock, Barbara & Neus Nogué Serrano
2017. The pragmatics of person reference. Languages in Contrast 17:1 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid
2017. Discursive double-legitimation of (avoiding) another war in Obama’s 2013 address on Syria. Journal of Language and Politics 16:5 ► pp. 706 ff. DOI logo
Pujante, David
2017. Chapter 3. The discursive construction of reality in the context of rhetoric. In Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 71], ► pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Pujante, David & Esperanza Morales-López
2017. Chapter 11. Discourses of social movements in Southern Europe. In Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 71], ► pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Martín Jiménez, Alfonso
2013. El componente retórico y el componente simbólico en la publicidad: Análisis de los anuncios de energía eólica de Iberdrola. Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica 39 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
O’Regan, Mary
2010. Political Language as a Flexible Friend: Irish Parliamentary Debate on the Iraq War. Irish Political Studies 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Profiling Discourse Participants [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 246], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.