Poriadok and Bardak (Order and Chaos)
The neo-fascist project of articulating a Russian “People”
This article argues that Russias various neo-fascist and ultra-nationalist groups are articulating a populism-in-formation around the signifiers order and people, and through the narrative of mischief. The process of signification and context are added to Ernesto Laclaus understanding of the process and politics of the articulation of hegemony. Texts, modes, symbols and narratives of various neo-fascist and ultra-nationalist groups are employed and analyzed to suggest the populism-in-formation that Russian neo-fascism represents. In concluding, the paper suggests that Russias National Bolshevik Party, insofar as they articulate a discourse that mobilizes resonant versions of order and people, and as their narrative mode highlights the mischievous version of masculinity which is dominant in Russian culture and politics, represents the potentiality of Russian neo-fascism to articulate a hegemonic populism.
Keywords: Culture, Laclau, populism, hegemony, Russia, discourse, neo-fascism, youth, extremism, narrative, signification, mischief
References (19)
References
Caldwell, Melissa L. 2002. The Taste of Nationalism: Food Politics in Post Socialist Moscow. Ethnos. Vol. 671, No. 31, 295—319.
Cheles, Luciano, Furguson, Ronnie & Vaughan, Michalina, (eds). 1991. Neo-Fascism in Europe. London: Longman.
Greimas, A. 1984. Structural Semantics Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
Holmes, Douglas R. 2000. Integral Europe: Fast-Capitalism, Multiculturalism, Neofascism. Princeton: Princeton.
Jameson, Frederic 1972. The Prison-House of Language. Princeton: Princeton.
Kaplan, Jeffrey, Weinberg, Leonard, (eds). 1998. The Emergence of a Euro-American Radical Right. London: Rutgers.
Laclau, Ernesto 1996. Butler, Judith. Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter for Politics?. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
Laclau, Ernesto 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
Lihachov, Vyacheslav 2002. Nazism v Rossii (Nazism in Russia). Moscow: Panorama.
Lotman, Yuri 1985. Uspenskii, B. Binary Models in the Dynamics of Russian Culture. Semiotics of Russian Culture: Essays. Lotman, Ginsburg, Uspenskii (eds). Ithaca: Cornell.
Lotman, Yuri 1990. Universe of the Mind; A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: I.B. Tauris.
Merkl, Peter H., Weinberg, Leonard. 1997. The Revival of Right-Wing Extremism in the Nineties. London: Frank Cass.
Nazpary, Joma 2002. Post-Soviet Chaos: Violence and Dispossession in Kazakhstan. London: Pluto Press.
Ries, Nancy 1997. Russian Talk: Culture and Conversation During Perestroika. Ithica: Cornell.
Rumer, Boris, (ed.). 2005. Central Asia at the End of Transition. Armonk Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Schreck, Carl 2006. Websites Under Scrutiny After Wake of Extremist Acts. Saint Petersburg Times. May 2, Shevchenko, Olga 2002. ‘Between the Holes’: Emerging Identities and Hybrid Patterns of Consumption in Post-Socialist Russia. Europe Asia Studies. Vol. 541, No. 6, 846—866.
Tishkov, Valery 2004. Chechnya: Life in a War-Torn Society. Berkeley: UC Press.
Urban, Michael Forthcoming. Post-Soviet Political Discourse and the Creation of Political Communities. Lotman and Cultural Studies. A. Schonle, A. Malkinger (eds). Madision: University of Wisconsin.
Urban, Michael 1996. Stages of Political Identity Formation in Late Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia. Identities in Transition. V. Bonnel (ed.). Berkeley: International and Area Studies.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Booth, Amy
2023.
Fractured in-group identity (re)negotiation in an online white nationalist forum.
Applied Corpus Linguistics 3:3
► pp. 100062 ff.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria & Stuart Macdonald
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.