Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 8:1 (2009) ► pp.52–71

Audience participation through interjection

Japanese municipal council sessions

| Nagoya University
This study examines a particular modality of audience participation in Japanese municipal council sessions. As with parliamentary debates elsewhere (Carbó 1992, Antaki & Leudar, 2001), the prescribed participation framework in a Japanese council session is highly structured so as to facilitate deliberation for the public good. Accordingly, the formal institutional rules do not assign the audience ratified speaking rights during question-answer periods. Nevertheless, audience members do insert interjectory remarks with precise timings to accomplish specific social consequences. While official records typically exclude audience voices and therefore fail to capture the relevant social consquences, the analysis of raw data brings them to light. This study investigates audience interjections in terms of their sociolinguistic characteristics, their placement in the on-going discussions, and their “covert” social consequences. The analysis shows that interjections in Japanese council sessions are tools for spontaneous politicking whereas the ostensibly deliberative proceedings are largely scripted performance.
Keywords: Japan, Japanese political discourse, Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly, audience participation, sociolinguistic styles, audience interjections
Published online: 1 April 2009
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.1.04ike
References (19)
References
Antaki, Charles., and Leudar, Ivan. 2001. Recruiting the record: Using opponents’ exact words in parliamentary argumentation. Text , 21(4), 467—488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Maxwell. 1984. Our masters’ voices. The Language and Body Language of Politics, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
Azuma, Shoji. 2000. Linguistic strategy of involvement: An emergence of new political speech in Japan. In: C. l. d. Landtsheer & O. Feldman (eds.) , Beyond public speech and symbols: Explorations in the rhetoric of politicians and the media (pp. 69—85). Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Brenneis, Donald. 1988. Language and disputing. Annual Review of Anthropology, 171, 221—37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carbó, Teresa. 1992. Towards an interpretation of interruptions in Mexican parliamentary discourse (1920—60). Discourse and Society, 3(1), 25—45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven. 1992. Caveat orator. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 781, 33—60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko. 1993. Social meanings of Japanese humble verb forms as used by government officials. Paper presented at the 4th International Pragmatics Conference, Kobe, Japan.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko. M. 1996. Japanese language socialization: Indexing the modes of self. Discourse Processes, 22 (2), 171—97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro., & Brenneis, Donald. 1986. The audience as co-author. Text 6(3), 329—47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: arper.Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of talk. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles., & Goodwin, Marjorie. 1992. Interstitial argument. In: A. D. Grimshaw (ed.) , Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversation (pp. 85—117). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jorden, Eleanor and Noda, Mari. (1987). Japanese : the Spoken Language. Part.1. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Cathérine. 2004. Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(1), 1—24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. 1993. Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structure. Language in Society, 221, 193—216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1994. Images of involvement and integrity: rhetorical style of a Japanese politician. Discourse & Society, 5(2), 233—261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noda, Mari. 1990. The extended predicate and confrontational discourse in Japanese. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey., Schegloff, Emanuel. A., & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 50>(4), 696—735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Tanaka, Lidia
2021. Japanese politicians’ questions in parliament. In Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 323], ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.