Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 9:2 (2010) ► pp.260280
References (45)
References
Badinter, Elisabeth. 1981. The Myth of Motherhood: A Historical View of the Maternal Instinct. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Andrew, Osborne, Thomas and Rose, Nikolas. (eds). 1996. Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burchell, Graham, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller. 1991. (eds). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burchell, Graham. 1995. The Attributes of Citizenship: Virtue, Manners and the Activity of Citizenship. Economy and Society Vol. 24, No. 4, November: 540–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dean, Mitchell. 1991. The Constitution of Poverty: Toward a Genealogy of Liberal Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fanon, Franz. 1986. Black Skin, White Mask. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge. ed. Colin Gordon. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1981. The Order of Discourse. In: Robert J.C. Young (ed.). Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1982. The Subject and Power, Afterword in: Hubert L. Dreyfus, and Paul Rabinow. Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. London: Harvester Wheat-sheaf.Google Scholar
Foucault Michel. 1988. The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom. In: James Bernauer, and David Ramussen (eds.). The Final Foucault. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality Vol. 1. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
1991a. “Governmentality”. In: Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller (eds.). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991b. Questions of Method. In: Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller (eds.). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Brighton: Harvester Wheat-sheaf.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2002. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1993. Clintonism, Welfare, and the Antisocial Wage: The Emergence of a Neoliberal Political Imaginary. Rethinking Marxism Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring: 9–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Gordon, Linda. 1994. A Genealogy of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of the U.S. Welfare State. Signs Vol. 19, No. 2: 309–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Colin. 1991. Governmental Rationality: An Introduction. In: Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller (eds.). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. 2002. The Moral Property of Women: A History of Birth Control Politics in America. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F, and Hasenfeld, Yeheskel. 1991. The Moral Construction of Poverty: Welfare Reform in America. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Henshaw, Stanley K. 1998. Unintended Pregnancy in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives Vol. 30, No. 1, Jan-Feb: 24–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hindess, Barry.1977. Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Sciences. Hassocks: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Hindess, Barry. 1996. Liberalism, Socialism and Democracy: Variations on a Governmental Theme. In: Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose. (eds). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 1991. The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Critics, American Political Science Review Vol. 85, No. 1, March: 77–96.Google Scholar
Kost, Kathryn, Landry, David, and Darroch, Jaqueline E. 1998. The Effects of Pregnancy Status on Birth Outcomes and Infant Care. Family Planning Perspectives Vol. 30, No. 5: 223–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. 1990. Post-Marxism without Apologies. In: Ernesto Laclau. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politic. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ladd-Taylor, Molly, and Umansky, Lauri (eds). 1988. “Bad Mothers”: The Politics of Blame in Twentieth-Century America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1991. The Inoperative Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, James T. 2000. America’s Struggle against Poverty in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Procacci, Giovanna. 1991. “Social Economy and the Government of Poverty”. In: Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller (eds). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
PRWORA 1996: Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (H.R. 3734) [URL] (Accessed October 13, 2006).Google Scholar
Reed, Adolph Jr. 1992. The Underclass as Myth and Symbol. Radical America Vol. 24, No. 1: 21–43.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1996. Governing “Advanced” Liberal Democracies. In: Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne, and Nikolas Rose (eds). Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas, and Miller, Peter. 1992. Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. British Journal of Sociology Vol. 43, No. 2, June: 173–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruhl, Leanne. 2002. Dilemmas of the Will: Uncertainty, Reproduction and the Rhetoric of Control. Signs Vol. 27, No. 3: 641–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santelli, John, Rochat, Roger, Hatfield-Timajchy, Kendra, Gilbert, Brenda G., Curtis, Kathryn, Cabral, Rebecca, Hirsch, Jennifer S., Schieve, Laura. Unintended Pregnancy Working Group. 2003. The Measurement and Meaning of Unintended Pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Vol. 35, No. 2: 94–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schram, Sanford. 1995. Words of Welfare: The Poverty of Social Science and the Social Science of Poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1995. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United State. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. 1991. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Rockville, MD. Report no. DHSS/PUB/PHS–91–50212.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health 2nd ed., Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, November 2000, DC 20402–9382.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Striley, Katie Margavio & Kimberly Field-Springer
2014. The Bad Mother Police: Theorizing Risk Orders in the Discourses of Infant Feeding Practices. Health Communication 29:6  pp. 552 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.