Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse and Socio-Political Transformations in Contemporary China
Edited by Paul Chilton, Hailong Tian and Ruth Wodak
[Journal of Language and Politics 9:4] 2010
► pp. 574–592

Discursive production of teaching quality assessment report

A Critical Discourse Analysis

| Tianjin University of Commerce and Lancaster University
To produce a teaching quality assessment (TQA) report in the TQA practice launched by the Chinese Ministry of Education the assessing group is naturally in an authoritative position, but the assessed university does not remain absolutely passive and dominated. To investigate this struggle of power over each other in producing the TQA report, the present research examines the discourse aspect of the TQA practice by observing the discursive strategies each party deployed. It is found that both parties resort to institutional power in their discourse practice, and that the assessed university incorporates promotional genres into its self-assessment discourse while the assessing group recontextualises the promotional statement in its authoritative TQA report. It is concluded, based on this case study, that the assessing group’s authoritative TQA report is largely influenced by the self-assessment of the assessed university.
Keywords: critical discourse analysis, TQA report, discursive strategies, power relations
Published online: 7 January 2011
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.4.06tia
References (15)
References
Chouliaraki, Lilie and Fairclough, Norman. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne and Martin, Jim. 1997. Genres and registers of discourse. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage, 230–256.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. The discourse of new Labour: Critical discourse analysis. In: Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates (eds.). Discourse as Data. London: Sage in association with The Open University, 229–266.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth. 1997. Critical discourse analysis. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258–284.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009. Discourse-historical approach. In: Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2nd edition). London: Sage, 87–121.Google Scholar
Tian, Hailong. 2009. Discourse Studies: Categories, Perspectives and Methodologies. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. In: Michael Toolan (ed.). Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Concepts in Linguistics (vol.II1). London and New York: Routledge, 104–141.Google Scholar
2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 1993. Genre and field in critical discourse analysis: A synopsis. In: Michael Toolan (ed.). Critical Discourse Analysis: Critical Concepts in Linguistics (vol.II1). London and New York: Routledge, 166–199.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2007. Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics and Cognition, 15(1): 203–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Fawunmi, Mayowa Owolabi, Ajibola Samuel Ogundare & Tolulope Deborah Iredele
2023. Visuality, Professionalism, and Branding. In Transformation of Higher Education Through Institutional Online Spaces [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ], ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Shahnaz, Ambreen, M. Abid & N. Kanwal
2023. Impact of marketization on the interpersonal relation between the university and students in modern university prospectuses. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Shahnaz, Ambreen & Nazia Suleman
2023. Semiotic analysis of university prospectuses in Pakistan: marketization, identity, and power dynamics. Social Semiotics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ho, Victor
2020. Marketization attempts by universities in Hong Kong: An appraisal analysis of institutional responses to quality audit evaluations. Lingua 237 ► pp. 102811 ff. DOI logo
Xiong, Tao
2012. Discourse and marketization of higher education in China: The genre of advertisements for academic posts. Discourse & Society 23:3 ► pp. 318 ff. DOI logo
Wodak, Ruth
2006. Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.