Article published In:
Journal of Language and Pop Culture: Online-First Articles“Then we’re just two dudes driving around”
Stand-up comedians’ exploitation of relational ambiguity in the Uber/Lyft chronotope
App-mediated ride sharing services like Uber and Lyft represent a relatively new chronotope that shapes
participants’ identities and relationships through specific space and time configurations. Ridesharing services such as these blur
the boundaries between what is public/private, familiar/unfamiliar, and interactional/transactional, resulting in chronotopically
specific scenarios that are often humorously exploited by stand-up comedians in their routines. In this paper, we analyze several
short video clips of performances posted by comedians on TikTok comprising narratives about Uber/Lyft experiences from the
perspective of the ridesharing passenger. Our findings show that in these comedic performances the ridesharing chronotope is
characterized by various forms of relational ambiguity and that this relational ambiguity structures interactional frames for its
participants. Through their comedic artistry, comedians animate the diverse voices engaged in these types of encounters, shedding
light on variable norms and ideologies underlying ridesharing interactions. This study addresses a novel context and an as-yet
unexplored topic: the language used by stand-up comedians who make their performances available to audiences through their social
media accounts. Methodologically, the affordances of TikTok facilitate the identification of topically similar comedic content,
resulting in a topic-based, rather than a performer-driven, analysis.
Keywords: ridesharing, humor, TikTok, social media, discourse analysis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The genre of stand-up comedy as a discourse type
- 3.Uber/Lyft ridesharing experience as chronotope
- 3.1Personal/professional
- 3.2Familiar/unfamiliar
- 3.3Interactional/transactional
- 4.Data collection and analytic procedures
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Private car, driver’s music
- 5.2Mismatched norms
- 5.3Flouting the familiar/unfamiliar distinction
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 20 December 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlpop.24022.vas
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlpop.24022.vas
References (41)
Anderson, D. N. (2016). Wheels in the head:
Ridesharing as monitored performance. Surveillance &
Society,
14
(2), 240–258.
Blanton, R. (2011). Chronotopic
landscapes of environmental racism. Journal of Linguistic
Anthropology,
21
(s1), E76–E93.
Blommaert, J. (2015). Chronotopes,
scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of
Anthropology,
44
1, 105–116.
Catedral, L., & Djuraeva, M. (2023). Whose
voice matters: Chronotopic position(ings) and the dialogic inclusion of marginalized stakeholders in critical applied
linguistics. Applied
Linguistics,
44
(3), 420–441.
Chovanec, J., & Tsakona, V. (2018). Investigating
the dynamics of humor: Towards a theory of interactional
humor. In V. Tsakona & J. Chovanec (Eds.) The
dynamics of interactional
humor (pp. 1–28). John Benjamins.
Chun, E. (2004). Ideologies
of legitimate mockery: Margaret Cho’s revoicings of mock
Asian. Pragmatics,
14
(2), 263–289.
Chun, E., & Walters, K. (2011). Orienting
to Arab Orientalisms: Language, race, and humor in a YouTube
video. In C. Thurlow & K. Mroczek (Eds.), Digital
discourse: Language in the new
media (pp. 251–273). Oxford University Press.
Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2020). Stereotypes
and chronotopes: The peasant and the cosmopolitan in narratives about migration. Journal of
Sociolinguistics,
24
(4), 419–440.
Cresswell, J., & Sullivan, P. (2020). Bakhtin’s
chronotope, connotations, and discursive psychology: Towards a richer interpretation of
experience. Qualitative Research in
Psychology,
17
(1), 121–142.
De Fina, A. (2022). “I
especially loved the little Nana dancing on the balcony”: The emergence, formation, and circulation of chronotopes in
mass-mediated communication. Language in
Society,
52
(4), 669–689.
(2024). Bonding
with followers: Chronotopes and scales in political communication on Instagram. Discourse
Studies.
Dick, H. P. (2010). Imagined lives and modernist
chronotopes in Mexcian non-migrant discourse. American
Ethnologist,
37
(2), 275–290.
Filani, I. (2015). Discourse
types in stand-up comedy performances: An examples of Nigerian stand-up comedy. European
Journal of Humor
Research,
3
(1), 41–60.
Fraser, S. (2006). The
chronotope of the queue: Methadone maintenance treatment and the production of time, space and
subjects. International Journal of Drug
Policy,
17
(3), 192–202.
Glick, D. J. (2007). Some performative techniques
of stand-up comedy: An exercise in the textuality of temporalization. Language &
Communication,
27
(3), 291–306.
Harden, J. (2000). Language,
discourse and the chronotope: Applying literary theory to the narratives in health
care. Journal of Advanced
Nursing,
31
(3), 506–512.
Kanai, A. (2019). Gender
and relatability in digital culture: Managing affect, intimacy and
value. Springer.
Lyft, (n.d.). Drive with lyft
— become a driver. [URL]
Lyons, A., & Tagg, C. (2019). The
discursive construction of mobile chronotopes in mobile phone messaging. Language in
Society,
48
(5), 657–683.
Koven, M. (2013). Antiracist,
modern selves and racist, unmodern others: Chronotopes of modernity in Luso-descendants’ race
talk. Language &
Communication
33
(4), 544–558.
Koziski, S. (1984). The
standup comedian as anthropologist: Intentional culture critic. Journal of Popular
Culture,
18
1, 57–76.
Makkar, M., Appau, S., & Belk, R. (2024). Value
outcomes in Airbnb as a chronotopic service. International Journal of Research in
Marketing.
Marchioro, M. M. (2022). On an equal footing: The
performance of up-and-coming and established comedians during social distancing. Comedy
Studies,
14
(1), 63–74.
Mintz, L. (1985). Standup
comedy as social and cultural mediation. American
Quarterly,
37
(1), 71–80.
Perrino, S. (2011). Chronotopes
of story and storytelling event in interviews. Language in
Society,
40
(1), 91–103.
(2021). Chronotope. In J. Stanlaw (Ed.), The
international encyclopedia of linguistic anthropology. Wiley.
Procházka, O. (2018). A
chronotopic approach to identity performance in a Facebook meme page. Discourse, Context &
Media,
25
1, 78–87.
(2020). Chronotopic
representations as an effect of individuation: The case of the European migrant
crisis. Language in
Society,
49
(5), 717–743.
Ritella, G., Rajalla, A., & Renshaw, P. (2021). Using
chronotope to research the space-time relations of learning and education: Dimensions of the unit of
analysis. Learning, Culture and Social
Interaction,
31
1, 100381.
Rosa, J. (2016). Racializing
language, regimenting Latinas/os: Chronotope, social tense, and American raciolinguistic
futures. Language &
Communication,
46
1, 106–117.
Scarpetta, F., & Spagnoli, A. (2009). The
interactional context of humor in stand-up comedy. Research on Language and Social
Interaction,
42
(3), 210–230.
Schellewald, A. (2021). Communicative
forms on TikTok: Perspectives from digital ethnography. International Journal of
Communication,
15
1, 1437–1457. [URL]
Seizer, S. (2011). On
the uses of obscenity in live stand-up comedy. Anthropological
Quarterly,
84
(1), 209–234.
Uber. (n.d.). Driver
requirements. [URL]
Vásquez, C., & Creel, S. (2017). Conviviality
through creativity: Appealing to the reblog in Tumblr Chat posts. Discourse, Context &
Media,
20
1, 59–69.
Vásquez, C., & Jiang, Y. (2025). Digital
discourse analysis. In L. Littosselliti (Ed.), Research
methods in applied
linguistics (pp. 321–347). Bloomsbury.