Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 13:2 (2024) ► pp.201–226

Navigating ‘safe’ and ‘non-safe’ queer spaces

A study of style-shifting in Singapore

| University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
It is well documented that gay people adopt behavioural strategies to navigate the heteronormative expectations and norms of social space. These practices are likely to be particularly pronounced in socially conservative countries which have seen less progress for LGBTQ+ rights. This study examines how two gay men (Rui and Kenni) stylistically negotiate their sexual identities in a socially conservative country – Singapore – by analyzing the variation in two phonetic variables that have been linked to gender and sexuality: Pitch and /s/. We show that both speakers style-shift across queer-friendly and heteronormative environments though the rate and degree of shifting is influenced both by the situated social meanings of the features and the interactional context. Concluding, we argue that research should consider how minoritised individuals are required to style-shift in order to adhere to the hegemonic norms and expectations of society.
Keywords: sexuality, style, style-shifting, Singapore, gayness, identity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Heteronormativity and LGBTQ+ rights in Singapore
  • 3.Gender, sexuality, and style
  • 4.Method
  • 5.Phonetic analyses
    • 5.1Fundamental frequency
    • 5.2Variation in /s/
    • 5.3Metalinguistic awareness of style-shifting
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 12 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.00036.kho
References (64)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Rusty. 1999. Indexing polyphonous identity in the speech of African American drag queens. In Reinventing Identities: The Gendered Self in Discourse, Mary Bucholtz, Anita C. Liang & Laurel A. Sutton (eds), 313–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard & Briggs, Charles L. 1990. Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, David & Valentine, Gill. 1995. Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Binnie, Jon. 1997. Coming out of geography: Towards a queer epistemology? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15(2): 223–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2022. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.17 <[URL]> (September 26, 2023)
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Zac, Fruehwald, Josef & Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2021. Cross-linguistic perception of /s/ among French, German, and English listeners. Language Variation and Change 331: 165–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calder, Jeremy. 2019. From sissy to sickening: The indexical landscape of /s/ in SoMa, San Francisco. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 29(3): 332–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2011. Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech 86(1): 52–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Phil C. W. 2009. Shared values of Singapore: Sexual minority rights as Singaporean value. International Journal of Human Rights 13(2–3): 279–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowie, Roddy, Douglas-Cowie, Ellen & Wichmann, Anne. 2002. Prosodic characteristics of skilled reading: Fluency and expressiveness in 8–10-year-old readers. Language and Speech 45(1): 47–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, Salina. 2019. Can Women ‘Sound Gay’? A Sociophonetic Study of /s /and Pitch of Gay and Straight British-English Speaking Women. (Unpublished) Doctoral dissertation, University of York.
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fecher, Natalie. 2011. ‘MeasureSpectralMomentsCreateTableExcel_Nat2’. Department of Language and Linguistics, University of York.Google Scholar
Gratton, Chantal. 2016. Resisting the gender binary: The use of (ING) in the construction of non-binary transgender identities. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(2): 51–60.Google Scholar
Hazenberg, Evan N. L. 2012. Language and Identity Practice: A Sociolinguistic Study of Gender in Ottawa, Ontario. (Unpublished) Doctoral dissertation, Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Hebdige, Dick. 1984. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. New York: Metheun.Google Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia. 2002. The pragmatics of intonational meaning. Speech Prosody 2002, International Conference. <[URL]> (September 26, 2023) DOI logo
Hollien, Harry & Michel, John F. 1968. Vocal fry as a phonational register. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 11(3): 600–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ICJ. 2023. Singapore: Long overdue decriminalization of consensual same-sex relations between men overshadowed by discriminatory constitutional amendment purporting to “protect” definition of marriage. International Commission of Jurists. <[URL]> (September 26, 2023)
Ilbury, Christian. 2019. ‘Sassy queens’: Stylistic orthographic variation in Twitter and the enregisterment of AAVE. Journal of Sociolinguistics 241: 245–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 2001. ‘Style’ as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford (eds), 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia, Garellek, Marc & Kreiman, Jody. 2015. Acoustic properties of different kinds of creaky voice. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 181: 2–7.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. 2019. The ‘gay voice’ and ‘brospeak’: Towards a systematic model of stance. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuah, Khun-Eng. 1990. Confucian ideology and social engineering in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia 20(3): 371–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert B. & Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leong, Laurence W. T. 1995. Walking the tightrope: The role of action for AIDS in the provision of social services in Singapore. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services 3(3): 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levon, Erez, Pharao, Nicolai & Maegaard, Marie (eds). 2017. The Sociophonetics of /s/ (special issue: Linguistics 55.5). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie & Pharao, Nicolai. 2015. /s/ variation and perceptions of male sexuality in Denmark. In Language, Sexuality, and Power: Studies in Intersectional Sociolinguistics, Erez Levon & Ronald Beline Mendes (eds), 88–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morrish, Liz & Sauntson, Helen. 2007. New Perspectives on Language and Sexual Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munson, Ben. 2007. The acoustic correlates of perceived masculinity, perceived femininity, and perceived sexual orientation. Language and Speech 50(1): 125–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munson, Ben & Babel, Molly. 2007. Loose lips and silver tongues, or, projecting sexual orientation through speech. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5): 416–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED, The Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2023. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Offord, Baden. 1999. The burden of (homo)sexual identity in Singapore. Social Semiotics 9(3): 301–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pak, Vincent. 2021. Coming out ‘softly’: Metapragmatic reflections of gay men in illiberal pragmatic Singapore. Gender & Language 15(3): 301–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2023. Lighting, signing, showing: The circulability of Pink Dot’s counterpublic discourse in Singapore. Journal of Sociolinguistics 27(1): 24–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pak, Vincent & Hiramoto, Mie. 2021. For family, for friends, for (true) love: Negotiating discourses of love within the LGBTQ community in Singapore. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10(2): 105–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4): 478–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Roberts, Sarah J. & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2002. Sharing resources and indexing meanings in the production of gay styles. In Language and Sexuality: Contesting Meaning in Theory and Practice, Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Robert J. Podesva, Sarah J. Roberts & Andrew Wong (eds), 175–189. Stanford, CA: CSLI Press.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. & Van Hofwegen, Janneke. 2016. /s/exuality in Smalltown California: Gender normativity and the acoustic realization of /s/. In Language, Sexuality, and Power: Studies in Intersectional Sociolinguistics, Erez Levon & Ronald B. Mendes (eds) 169–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rowan, Diana, Long, Dennis D. & Johnson, Darrin. 2013. Identity and self-presentation in the House/Ball culture: A primer for social workers. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services 25(2): 178–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2011. Style repertoire and social change in British Asian English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4): 464–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4): 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Ron, Jacobs, Greg & Rogers, Henry. 2003. Male voices and perceived sexual orientation: An experimental and theoretical approach. Language in Society 32(3): 329–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snell, Julia. 2010. From sociolinguistic variation to socially strategic stylisation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(5): 630–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strand, Elizabeth A. 1999. Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1): 86–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suire, Alexandre, Tognetti, Arnaud, Durand, Valérie, Raymond, Michael & Barkat-Defradas, Melissa. 2020. Speech acoustic features: A comparison of gay men, heterosexual men, and heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior 49(7): 2575–2583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Švec, Jan G., Schutte, Harm K. & Miller, Donald G. 1999. On pitch jumps between chest and falsetto registers in voice: Data from living and excised human larynges. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106(3): 1523–1531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Urban Dictionary. 2023. <[URL]> (September 26, 2023).
Valentine, Gill. 2002. Queer bodies and the production of space. In Handbook of Lesbian and Gay Studies, Diane Richardson & Steven Siedman (eds), 145–160. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Toorn, Jojanneke, Pliskin, Ruthie & Morgenroth, Thekla. 2020. Not quite over the rainbow: The unrelenting and insidious nature of heteronormative ideology. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 341: 160–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waksler, Rachelle. 2001. Pitch range and women’s sexual orientation. Word 52(1): 69–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walls, N. Eugene. 2008. Toward a multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: The changing nature of prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality 55(1): 20–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Ariel & Tan, Shih J. 2020. Capital punishment in Singapore: A critical analysis of state justifications from 2004 to 2018. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 9(2): 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yulius, Hendri, Tang, Shawna & Offord, Baden. 2018. The globalization of LGBT identity and same-sex marriage as a catalyst of neo-institutional values: Singapore and Indonesia in focus. In Global Perspectives on Same-Sex Marriage, Bronwyn Winter, Maxime Forest & Réjane Sénac (eds), 171–196. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Sociolinguistic agency and the gendered voice: Metalinguistic negotiations of vocal masculinization among female-to-male transgender speakers. In Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research, Anna M. Babel (ed), 253–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Gender as stylistic bricolage: Transmasculine voices and the relationship between fundamental frequency and /s/. Language in Society 46(3): 339–370.Google Scholar