Cover not available
Article published In:
Corpus Linguistics in Language and Sexuality Studies: Developments and Prospects
Edited by Heiko Motschenbacher
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 7:2] 2018
► pp. 145–174

Corpus linguistics in language and sexuality studies

Taking stock and looking ahead

| Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway
As an introduction to the special issue, this paper presents an overview of previous corpus linguistic work in the field of language and sexuality and discusses the compatibility of corpus linguistic methodology with queer linguistics as a central theoretical approach in language and sexuality studies. The discussion is structured around five prototypical aspects of corpus linguistics that may be deemed problematic from a poststructuralist, queer linguistic perspective: quantification and associated notions of objectivity, reliance on linguistic forms and formal presence, concentration on highly frequent features, reliance on categories, and highlighting of differences. It is argued that none of these aspects rules out an application of corpus linguistic techniques within queer theoretically informed linguistic work per se and that it is rather the way these techniques are employed that can be seen as more or less compatible with queer linguistics. To complement the theoretical discussion, a collocation analysis of sexual descriptive adjectives in the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) is conducted in an attempt to address some of the issues raised. The concluding section makes suggestions for future research.
Keywords: corpus linguistics, queer linguistics, language and sexuality, methodology, sexual descriptive adjectives, collocation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Taking stock: Corpus-based studies in the field of language and sexuality
  • 3.Corpus linguistics and queer linguistic challenges
    • 3.1Quantification and objectivity
    • 3.2Foregrounding of highly frequent items
    • 3.3Reliance on form and formal presence
    • 3.4Categories as analytical foundation
    • 3.5Difference focus
  • 4.Methodological considerations
  • 5.Usage patterns of sexual descriptive adjectives: A collocation analysis
  • 6.Conclusion: Looking ahead
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 27 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.17019.mot
References (87)
References
Archer, Dawn, Culpeper, Jonathan & Rayson, Paul. 2009. Love – ‘a familiar or a devil’? An exploration of key domains in Shakespeare’s comedies and tragedies. In What’s in a Word-List? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction, Dawn Archer (ed), 137–157. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Aull, Laura L. & West Brown, David. 2013. Fighting words. A corpus analysis of gender representations in sports reportage. Corpora 8(1): 27–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bachmann, Ingo. 2011. Civil partnership – ‘gay marriage in all but name’. A corpus-driven analysis of discourses of same-sex relationships in the UK Parliament. Corpora 6(1): 77–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2002. Polari – The Lost Language of Gay Men. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004a. Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 32(4): 346–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004b. ‘Unnatural acts’: Discourses of homosexuality within the House of Lords debates on gay male law reform. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1): 88–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Public Discourses of Gay Men. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2008. ‘Eligible’ bachelors and ‘frustrated’ spinsters. Corpus linguistics, gender and language. In Gender and Language Research Methodologies, Kate Harrington, Lia Litosseliti, Helen Sauntson & Jane Sunderland (eds), 73–84. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2010. Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English. Gender and Language 4(1): 125–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Discourse and gender. In Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis, Ken Hyland & Brian Paltridge (eds), 199–212. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2012. Corpora and gender studies. In Corpus Applications in Applied Linguistics, Ken Hyland, Chau Meng Huat & Michael Handford (eds), 100–116. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2014a. Using Corpora to Analyze Gender. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2014b. ‘Bad wigs and screaming mimis’: Using corpus-assisted techniques to carry out critical discourse analysis of the representation of trans people in the British press. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, Christopher Hart & Piotr Cap (eds), 211–235. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2015. Two hundred years of the American man. In Language and Masculinities: Performances, Intersections, Dislocations, Tommaso M. Milani (ed), 34–52. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2016. Gendered discourses. In Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research, Paul Baker & Jesse Egbert (eds), 138–151. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas, KhosraviNik, Majid, Krzyżanowski, Michał, McEnery, Tony & Wodak, Ruth. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19(3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul & Levon, Erez. 2015. Picking the right cherries? A comparison of corpus-based and qualitative analyses of news articles about masculinity. Discourse & Communication 9(2): 221–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. ‘That’s what I call a man’: Representations of racialised and classed masculinities in the UK print media. Gender and Language 10(1): 106–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, Federica. 2007. Older men and younger women. A corpus-based study of quotative use in American English. English World-Wide 28(1): 23–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Rusty. 2014. The emergence of the unmarked: Queer theory, language ideology, and formal linguistics. In Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Lal Zimman, Jenny L. Davis & Joshua Raclaw (eds), 195–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi (eds). 2015. The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bing, Janet M. & Bergvall, Victoria L. 1996. The question of questions. Beyond binary thinking. In Rethinking Language and Gender Research. Theory and Practice, Victoria L. Bergvall, Janet M. Bing & Alice F. Freed (eds), 1–30. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bogetic, Ksenija. 2013. Normal straight gays. Lexical collocations and ideologies of masculinity in personal ads of Serbian gay teenagers. Gender and Language 7(3): 333–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1998. Dreaming the dictionary: Keywords and corpus linguistics. Key Words: A Journal of Cultural Materialism 11: 35–46.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah & Kulick, Don. 2003. Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, David & Kowitz, Johanna. 1994. Using concordancing techniques to study gender stereotyping in ELT textbooks. In Exploring Gender. Questions and Implications for English Language Education, Jane Sunderland (ed), 73–82. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. Keyness: Words, parts-of-speech and semantic categories in the character-talk of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(1): 29–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2009. The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 159–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The corpus of contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing 25(4): 447–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Jenny L., Zimman, Lal & Raclaw, Joshua. 2014. Opposites attract: Retheorizing binaries in language, gender, and sexuality. In Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Lal Zimman, Jenny L. Davis & Joshua Raclaw (eds), 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Baker, Paul. 2016. Research synthesis. In Triangulating Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research, Paul Baker & Jesse Egbert (eds), 183–208. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan. 2001. Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gales, Tammy 2015. The stance of stalking: A corpus-based analysis of grammatical markers of stance in threatening communications. Corpora 10(2): 171–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Anne. 2008. ‘Männersprache’ – ‘Frauensprache’? Eine korpusgestützte empirische Analyse des Sprachgebrauchs britischer und amerikanischer Frauen und Männer hinsichtlich Geschlechtsspezifika. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira. 2013. ‘It’s a hijra!’. Queer linguistics revisited. Discourse & Society 24(5): 634–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrington, Kate. 2008. Perpetuating difference? Corpus linguistics and the gendering of reported dialogue. In Gender and Language Research Methodologies, Kate Harrington, Lia Litosseliti, Helen Sauntson & Jane Sunderland (eds), 85–102. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jiménez, Catalán, Rosa Maria & Ojeda Alba, Julieta. 2008. The English vocabulary of girls and boys. Evidence from a quantitative study. In Gender and Language Research Methodologies, Kate Harrington, Lia Litosseliti, Helen Sauntson & Jane Sunderland (eds), 103–115. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
King, Brian W. 2009. Building and analysing corpora of computer-mediated communication. In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, Paul Baker (ed), 301–320. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2015. Investigating digital sex talk practices: A reflection on corpus-assisted discourse analysis. In Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age, Rodney H. Jones, Alice Chik & Christoph A. Hafner (eds), 130–143. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran. 1986. ‘The lesser man’: Observations on the role of women in modern English writings. In Corpus Linguistics II. New Studies in the Analysis and Exploitation of Computer Corpora, Jan Aarts & Willem Meijs (eds), 163–176. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don. 2005. The importance of what gets left out. Discourse Studies 7(4/5): 615–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leap, William L. 2015. Queer linguistics as critical discourse analysis. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 661–680. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leipold, Ute. 2006. Constructing the self and constructing the (significant) other. A corpus-based critical analysis of gender identities in personal ads. In Planing [sic], Gluing and Painting Corpora. Inside the Applied Corpus Linguist’s Workshop, Bernhard Kettemann & Georg Marko (eds), 151–174. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Love, Robbie & Baker, Paul 2015. The hate that dare not speak its name? Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(1): 57–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, Elizabeth. 1997. Kissing and cuddling. The reciprocity of romantic and sexual activity. In Language and Desire. Encoding Sex, Romance and Intimacy, Keith Harvey & Celia Shalom (eds), 43–59. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marchi, Anna & Taylor, Charlotte. 2009. If on a winter’s night two researchers… A challenge to assumptions of soundness of interpretation. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 3(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Marko, Georg. 2006. ‘… was an incredibly sexy Latin stud.’ Critically analysing descriptors in a (pornography) corpus. In Planing [sic], Gluing and Painting Corpora. Inside the Applied Corpus Linguist’s Workshop, Bernhard Kettemann & Georg Marko (eds), 175–203. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2008. Penetrating Language. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Pornography. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde. 2009. Corpora and critical discourse analysis. In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, Paul Baker (ed), 32–46. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2016. Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds), 154–179. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Baker, Helen. 2017a. Corpus Linguistics and 17th-Century Prostitution: Computational Linguistics and History. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2017b. The public representation of homosexual men in seventeenth-century England – A corpus based view. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 3(2): 197–217.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M. 2013. Are ‘queers’ really ‘queer’? Language, identity and same-sex desire in a South African online community. Discourse & Society 24(5): 615–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2008. Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morrish, Liz & Sauntson, Helen. 2007. New Perspectives on Language and Sexual Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Gender, desire and identity in a corpus of lesbian erotica. In Queering Paradigms II. Interrogating Agendas, Burkhard Scherer & Matthew Ball (eds), 63–81. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2010. Language, Gender and Sexual Identity. Poststructuralist Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Taking Queer Linguistics further. Sociolinguistics and critical heteronormativity research. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2121: 149–179.Google Scholar
. 2013. Gentlemen before ladies? A corpus-based study of conjunct order in personal binomials. Journal of English Linguistics 41(3): 212–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Focusing on normativity in language and sexuality studies. Insights from conversations on objectophilia. Critical Discourse Studies 11(1): 49–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. A corpus linguistic study of the situatedness of English pop song lyrics. Corpora 11(1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Sexuality in critical discourse studies. In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, John Flowerdew & John E. Richardson (eds), 388–402. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. forthcoming a. Language and sexual normativity. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Rusty Barrett & Kira Hall (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. forthcoming b. Gay people and homosexual persons: A co-occurrence analysis of sexual descriptive adjectives in COCA.
Murphy, Bróna. 2010. Corpus and Sociolinguistics. Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne & Breen, Michael J. 2007. At the hands of the brothers. A corpus-based lexico-grammatical analysis of stance in newspaper reporting of child sexual abuse cases. In The Language of Sexual Crime, Janet Cotterill (ed), 217–236. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne & McCarthy, Michael (eds). 2012. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2014. Mind the gaps: The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(1): 118–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Michael. 2008. Investigating the collocational behaviour of MAN and WOMAN in the BNC using Sketch Engine. Corpora 3(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, Paul. 2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4): 519–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, Paul, Leech, Geoffrey & Hodges, Mary. 1997. Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary. Some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2(1): 133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauntson, Helen & Sundaram, Vanita. 2016. Discursive silences: Critically analysing the presence/absence of sexual diversity in the sex and relationships education guidance for England and Wales. In Global Perspectives and Key Debates in Sex and Relationships Education: Addressing Issues of Gender, Sexuality, Plurality and Power, Vanita Sundaram & Helen Sauntson (eds), 100–114. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2003. Do women and men really live in different cultures? Evidence from the BNC. In Corpus Linguistics by the Lune. A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, Andrew Wilson, Paul Rayson & Tony McEnery (eds), 185–221. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2015. Does gender-related variation still have an effect, even when topic and (almost) everything else is controlled? In Change of Paradigms – New Paradoxes: Recontextualizing Language and Linguistics, Jocelyne Daems, Eline Zenner, Kris Heylen, Dirk Speelman & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 327–346. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Schröter, Melani & Taylor, Charlotte. 2018. Introduction. In Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse: Empirical Approaches, Melani Schröter & Charlotte Taylor (eds), 1–21. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2009. In search of a bad reference corpus. In What’s in a Word-List? Investigating Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction, Dawn Archer (ed), 79–92. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sigley, Robert & Holmes, Janet. 2002. Looking at girls in corpora of English. Journal of English Linguistics 30(2): 138–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte. 2013. Searching for similarity using corpus-assisted discourse studies. Corpora 8(1): 81–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigo, Francesca. 2015. And what about same sex marriages? A corpus-based analysis of lexical choices and social attitudes. In Languaging Diversity: Identities, Genres, Discourses, Giuseppe Balirano & Maria Cristina Nisco (eds), 197–210. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew. 2012. Using corpora in depth psychology. A trigram-based analysis of a corpus of fetish fantasies. Corpora 7(1): 69–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimman, Lal, Davis, Jenny L. & Raclaw, Joshua (eds). 2014. Queer Excursions: Retheorizing Binaries in Language, Gender, and Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Rennick, Stephanie & Seán Roberts
2024. The Video Game Dialogue Corpus. Corpora 19:1 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Sanz-Valdivieso, Lucía
2023. Give it to her. Journal of Language and Sexuality 12:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Jantunen, Jarmo Harri & Samu Kytölä
2022. Online discourses of ‘homosexuality’ and religion. Journal of Language and Sexuality 11:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Pak, Vincent & Mie Hiramoto
2022. “Itching to make an impact”: constructing the mobile Singaporean voluntourist in Instagram travel narratives. Social Semiotics 32:3 ► pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
Wilkinson, Mark
2022. Radical contingency, radical historicity and the spread of ‘homosexualism’: A diachronic corpus-based critical discourse analysis of queer representation in The Times between 1957–1967 and 1979–1990. Discourse, Context & Media 48 ► pp. 100623 ff. DOI logo
Konnelly, Lex
2021. Nuance and normativity in trans linguistic research. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Leap, William L.
2021. Moving into the next ten years. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Russell, Eric Louis
2021. The Evidentiary Bases of Alpha Male Discourse. In Alpha Masculinity, ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Heritage, Frazer & Veronika Koller
2020. Incels, in-groups, and ideologies. Journal of Language and Sexuality 9:2 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Jones, Lucy & Luke Collins
2020. PrEP in the press. Journal of Language and Sexuality 9:2 ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía & Turo Hiltunen
2020. Democratization and Gender-neutrality in English(es). Journal of English Linguistics 48:3 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Mattfeldt, Anna
2020. Marginalisierung in der Marginalität?. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2020:73 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Bailey, Aimee
2019. “Girl-on-girl culture”. Journal of Language and Sexuality 8:2 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Coffey-Glover, Laura & Rachel Handforth
2019. Discourses of (hetero)sexism in popular music. Journal of Language and Sexuality 8:2 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Coimbra-Gomes, Elvis & Heiko Motschenbacher
2019. Language, normativity, and sexual orientation obsessive-compulsive disorder (SO-OCD): A corpus-assisted discourse analysis. Language in Society 48:4 ► pp. 565 ff. DOI logo
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2019. Discursive shifts associated with coming out: A corpus‐based analysis of news reports about Ricky Martin. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23:3 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2020. Corpus Linguistic Onomastics: A Plea for a Corpus-Based Investigation of Names. Names 68:2 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2020. Language use before and after Stonewall: A corpus-based study of gay men’s pre-Stonewall narratives. Discourse Studies 22:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2020. Coming out and normative shifts. Sociolinguistic Studies 14:1-2 DOI logo
Motschenbacher, Heiko
2021. Language and sexuality studies today. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Sagredos, Christos
2019. The representation of sex work in the Greek Press. Journal of Language and Sexuality 8:2 ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.