Cover not available
Article published In:
Pink Dot: Discursive Formations, Constructions, and Contestations
Edited by Adi Saleem Bharat, Pavan Mano and Robert Phillips
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:2] 2021
► pp. 157–179

Tracing trans-regional discursive flows in Pink Dot Hong Kong promotional videos

(Homo)normativities and nationalism, activism and ambivalence

| Hong Kong Baptist University, China
| National University of Singapore, Singapore
In this article, we extend discourse analytical research that has focused on Pink Dot events in Singapore to events in Hong Kong. As such we engage queer Sinophone perspectives to examine the simultaneously local and transregional epistemological flows that converge and diverge within the margins of the Sinophone cultural sphere. Using a multimodal analysis of two Pink Dot Hong Kong promotional videos, we investigate the extent to which these videos follow the (homo)normative and (homo)nationalist discursive strategies identified in the literature on Pink Dot Singapore. Our analysis suggests that ambivalences surrounding national identity, citizenship and state-sponsored national values in the Hong Kong videos bring into question readings of the Pink Dot movement as a (homo)nationalist enterprise, thus indicating an emergent relocalization of Pink Dot strategies that draws attention to how queer movements in Hong Kong are currently being shaped within the city’s broader sociopolitical context.
Keywords: Asian LGBT+ activism, Pink Dot, Hong Kong, normativities, queer Sinophone cultures, multimodal discourse analysis, homonationalism, citizenship
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Hong Kong and Singapore: Perspectives from queer Sinophone cultures
  • 3.Intra-regional flows: From tongzhi discourse to Singaporean homonationalism (and back again)
  • 4.Analytical approach
  • 5.Pink Dot HK 2014 – Embrace our differences. Celebrate diversity!
  • 6.Pink Dot 2018 – Pink Ambassadors 粉紅大使 – Angus Leung and Scott Adams
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.20007.row
References (44)
References
Barr, Michael. 2019. Singapore: A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiang, Howard. 2013. (De) provincialising China: Queer historicism and Sinophone postcolonial critique. In Queer Sinophone Cultures, Howard Chiang & Ari Larissa Heinrich (eds). 19–43. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiang, Howard & Heinrich, Ari Larissa (eds). 2013. Queer Sinophone Cultures. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chou, Wah-Shan. 2001. Homosexuality and the cultural politics of tongzhi in Chinese societies. In Gay and Lesbian Asia: Culture, Identity, Community, Gerard Sullivan & Peter A. Jackson (eds), 27–46. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2012. Pragmatic resistance, law, and social movements in authoritarian states: The case of gay collective action in Singapore. Law & Society Review 46(4): 713–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
George, Cherian. 2000. Singapore the Air-Conditioned Nation: Essays on the Politics of Comfort and Control 1990–2000. Singapore: Landmark Books.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira, Levon, Erez & Milani, Tommaso M. 2019. Navigating normativities: Gender and sexuality in text and talk. Language in Society 48(4): 481–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2009. Stance, style, and the linguistic individual. In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, Alexandra Jaffe (ed), 29–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kam, Lucetta Y. L. 2017. Return, come out: Queer lives in postcolonial Hong Kong. In Hong Kong Culture and Society in the New Millennium, Yiu-Wai Chu (ed). 165–178. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kong, Travis S. K. 2011. Chinese Male Homosexualities: Memba, Tongzhi and Golden Boy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kong, Travis S. K., Lau, Sky H. L. & Li, Eva C. Y. 2015. The fourth wave? A critical reflection on the tongzhi movement in Hong Kong. In The Routledge Handbook of Sexuality Studies in East Asia, Mark McLelland & Vera Mackie (eds), 188–201. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther. 2014. Multimodal discourse analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, James Paul Gee & Michael Handford (eds), 35–50. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther R. & van Leeuwen, Theo. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, Wai-man. 2005. Depoliticization, citizenship, and the politics of community in Hong Kong. Citizenship Studies 9(3): 309–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, Holning S. 2011. Grounding conversations on sexuality and Asian law. University of California Davis Law Review 441: 773–802.Google Scholar
Lau, Siu-kai. 2002. Tung Chee-hwa’s governing strategy: The shortfall in politics. In The First Tung Chee-hwa Administration: The First Five Years of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Siu-kai Lau (ed), 1–40. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Lazar, Michelle M. 2017. Homonationalist discourse as a politics of pragmatic resistance in Singapore’s Pink Dot movement: Towards a southern praxis. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(3): 420–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. Semiotics of homonationalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, Po-han. 2019. Queer Asia’s body without organs: In the making of queer/decolonial politics. In Queer Asia: Decolonising and Reimagining Sexuality and Gender, Daniel Luther & Jennifer Ung-Loh (eds), 219–242. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Leong, Laurence Wai Teng. 2012. Sexual vigilantes invade gender spaces. In Queer Singapore: Illiberal Citizenship and Mediated Cultures, Audrey Yue & Jun Zubillaga-Pow (eds), 59–69. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leung, Helen Hok-Sze. 2008. Undercurrents: Queer Culture and Postcolonial Hong Kong. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Luther, Daniel & Ung-Loh, Jennifer (eds). 2019. Queer Asia: Decolonising and Reimagining Sexuality and Gender. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Martin, Fran. 2014. Transnational queer sinophone cultures. In The Routledge Handbook of Sexuality Studies in East Asia, Mark McLelland & Vera Mackie (eds), 53–66. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, Fran, Jackson, Peter A., McLelland, Mark & Yue, Audrey (eds). 2008. AsiaPacifiQueer: Rethinking Genders and Sexualities. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M. & Lazar, Michelle M. 2017. Seeing from the South: Discourse, gender and sexuality from southern perspectives. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(3): 307–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milani, Tommaso M. & Levon, Erez. 2016. Sexing diversity: Linguistic landscapes of homonationalism. Language & Communication 511: 69–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Israel as homotopia: Language, space, and vicious belonging. Language in Society 48(4): 607–628. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1996. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 438–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Robert. 2013. “We aren’t really that different”: Globe-hopping discourse and queer rights in Singapore. Journal of Language and Sexuality 2(1): 122–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. ‘And I am also gay’: Illiberal pragmatics, neoliberal homonormativity and LGBT activism in Singapore. Anthropologica 56(1): 45–54.Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir K. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Raleigh, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shih, Shu-mei. 2007. Visuality and Identity: Sinophone Articulations across the Pacific. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Chris. 2015. Pink dot: Cultural and sexual citizenship in gay Singapore. Anthropological Quarterly 88(4): 969–996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. A ‘great affective divide’: How gay Singaporeans overcome their double alienation. Anthropological Forum 26(1): 17–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, Alvin K. 2020. Queer vernacularism: Minor transnationalism across Hong Kong and Singapore. Cultural Dynamics 32 (1–2): 49–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, Andrew D. 2005. The reappropriation of tongzhi. Language in Society 34(5): 763–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, Day. 2007. Rethinking the coming home alternative: Hybridization and coming out politics in Hong Kong’s anti-homophobia parades. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 8(4): 600–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. (Post-)identity politics and Anti-normalization: (Homo)sexual rights movement. In Remaking Citizenship in Hong Kong, Agnes S. Ku & Pun Ngai (eds), 195–214. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wong, Kai Yeung. 2015. Taking transgender rights seriously: A rights-based model of gender recognition in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Law Journal 45(1): 109–126.Google Scholar
Yue, Audrey. 2012. Queer Singapore: A critical introduction. In Queer Singapore: Illiberal Citizenship and Mediated Cultures, Audrey Yue & Jun Zubillaga-Pow (eds), 1–25. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Trans-Singapore: Some notes towards queer Asia as method. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 18(1): 10–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yue, Audrey & Leung, Helen Hok-Sze. 2017. Notes towards the queer Asian city: Singapore and Hong Kong. Urban Studies 54(3): 747–764. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rowlett, Benedict J. L. & Christian Go
2024. “The Amazingly Fabulous Tuk tuk Race”: mobility and carnival praxis in the semiotic landscape of Phnom Penh Pride. Social Semiotics 34:3 ► pp. 430 ff. DOI logo
Pak, Vincent
2023. Lighting, signing, showing: The circulability of Pink Dot's counterpublic discourse in Singapore. Journal of Sociolinguistics 27:1 ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.