The article provides a comprehensive overview of attitudes towards nonbinary pronouns, with the aim of better
understanding why these pronouns are either accepted or rejected. Attitudes towards nonbinary they and the
neopronouns ze and xe are explored with a thematic analysis of data derived from a larger online
survey on pronouns (n = 1128). While the results demonstrate various polarized stances for both types of
pronouns, the participants’ reactions highlight greater acceptance of and support for nonbinary they. In
addition, the paper proposes that broader ideologies about gender are behind the participants’ overt reactions to nonbinary
pronouns. Most notably, while some participants rejected the pronouns on the basis of a binary gender ideology, others viewed
gender as a matter of self-identification, accepting any pronoun an individual chooses for themselves.
Ackerman, Lauren. 2019. Syntactic
and cognitive issues investigating gendered coreference. Glossa: A Journal of General
Linguistics 4(1): 1–27.
American Dialect Society. 2020. 2019
Word of the year is “(my) pronouns,” Word of the decade is singular “they”. <[URL]> (May31, 2021)
American Psychological
Association. 2019. Singular “they”. APA
style. <[URL]> (May31, 2021)
Anthony, Laurence. 2018. AntConc. Version
3.5.7. Waseda University.
Baron, Dennis. 1981. The
epicene pronoun: The word that failed. American
Speech 56(2): 83–97.
Bjorkman, Bronwyn. 2017. Singular
they and the syntactic representation of gender in English. Glossa: A
Journal of General
Linguistics 2(1): 1–13.
Blaubergs, Maija. 1980. An
analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. Women’s Studies International
Quarterly 3(2): 135–147.
Bradley, Evan. 2020. The
influence of linguistic and social attitudes on grammaticality judgments of singular
‘they’. Language
Sciences 781: 1–11.
Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria. 2006. Using
thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology 3(2): 77–101.
Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria. 2016. (Mis)conceptualising
themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic
analysis. International Journal of Social Research
Methodology 19(6): 739–743.
Chak, Avinash. 2015. Beyond
‘he’ and ‘she’: The rise of non-binary pronouns. BBC News Online. <[URL]> (January14, 2020)
Conrod, Kirby. 2019. Pronouns
Raising and Emerging. (Unpublished) PhD
dissertation, University of Washington.
Corwin, Anna. 2017. Emerging
genders: Semiotic agency and the performance of gender among genderqueer individuals. Gender
and
Language 11(2): 255–277.
Curzan, Anne. 2014. Fixing
English: Prescriptivism and Language
History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, Helena. 2017. Doing
gender beyond the binary: A virtual ethnography. Symbolic
Interaction 40(3): 317–334.
Duggan, Maeve & Smith, Aaron. 2013. 6%
of Online Adults are Reddit Users. <[URL]> (January14, 2020)
Garrett, Peter. 2010. Attitudes
to Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gustafsson Sendén, Marie, Bäck, Emma & Lindqvist, Anna. 2015. Introducing
a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language: The influence of time on attitudes and
behavior. Frontiers in
Psychology 61: 1–12.
Hekanaho, Laura. 2020. Generic
and Nonbinary Pronouns: Usage, Acceptability and Attitudes. (Unpublished) PhD
dissertation, University of Helsinki. <[URL]> (May31, 2021)
Hernandez, Ellis. 2020. Pronouns,
Prescriptivism, and Prejudice: Attitudes Toward the Singular ‘They’, Prescriptive Grammar, and Nonbinary Transgender
People. (Unpublished) MA thesis, Purdue University.
Konnelly, Lex & Cowper, Elizabeth. 2020. Gender
diversity and morphosyntax: An account of singular they. Glossa: A Journal of
General
Linguistics 5(1): 1–19.
Lund Eide, Mari. 2018. Shaping
the Discourse of Gender-Neutral Pronouns in English: A Study of Attitudes and use in
Australia. (Unpublished) MA thesis, University of Bergen.
Marquis, Marriott. 2015. Word
of the year is singular “they”. <[URL]> (January14, 2020)
Martyna, Wendy. 1978. What
does ‘he’ mean? Use of the generic masculine. Journal of
Communication 28(1): 131–138.
Matsuno, Emmie & Budge, Stephanie. 2017. Non-binary/genderqueer
identities: A critical review of the literature. Current Sexual Health
Reports 91: 116–120.
Mauri, Michele, Tommaso, Elli, Caviglia, Giorgio, Uboldi, Giorgio & Azzi, Matteo. 2017. RAWGraphs:
A Visualisation Platform to Create Open Outputs. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Merriam-Webster. 2019. A note on the
nonbinary ‘they’. <[URL]> (January14, 2020)
Milroy, James. 2001. Language
ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of
Sociolinguistics 5(4): 530–555.
Milroy, Lesley. 2004. Language
ideologies and linguistic change. In Sociolinguistic Variation:
Critical Reflections, Carmen Fought (ed), 308–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parker, Linden. 2017. An
Exploration of Use of and Attitudes Towards Gender-Neutral Pronouns among the Non-Binary, Transgender and LGBT+ Communities in
the United Kingdom. (Unpublished) MA thesis, University of Essex.
Parks, Janet & Roberton, Mary Ann. 1998. Contemporary arguments
against nonsexist language: Blaubergs (1980) Revisited. Sex
Roles 39(5): 445–461.
Pauwels, Anne. 2010. Socially
motivated language reform in a global lingua franca: The case of gender reform in
English. In Language in its Socio-Cultural
Context, Markus Bieswanger, Heiko Motschenbacher & Susanne Mühleisen (eds), 21–33. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Preston, Dennis. 2011. The
power of language regard – Discrimination, classification, comprehension, and
production. Dialectologia 7(2): 9–33.
Rosa, Jonathan & Burdick, Christa. 2016. Language
ideologies. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and
Society, Ofelia Garcia, Nelson Flores & Massimiliano Spotti (eds), 103–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sallabank, Julia. 2013. Attitudes
to Endangered Languages: Identities and Policies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scelfo, Julie. 2015. A
university recognizes a third gender: Neutral. New York Times. <[URL]> (January14, 2020)
Seargeant, Philip. 2007. Language
ideology, language theory, and the regulation of linguistic behaviour. Language
Sciences 311: 345–359.
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. Language
structure and linguistic ideology. In The Elements: A Parasession on
Linguistic Units and Levels, Paul Clyne, William F. Hanks & Carol L. Hofbauer (eds), 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Song, Hyunjin & Schwarz, Norbert. 2009. If
it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk
perception. Psychological
Science 20(2): 135–138.
van Dijk, Teun A.2006. Ideology and discourse
analysis. Journal of Political
Ideologies 11(2): 115–140.
Vergoossen, Hellen, Renström, Emma, Lindqvist, Anna & Gustafsson Sendén, Marie. 2020. Four
dimensions of criticism against gender-fair language. Sex
Roles 83(4–5): 328–337.
Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal
Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zimman, Lal. 2017. Transgender
language reform: Some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming, gender-inclusive
language. Journal of Language and
Discrimination 1(1): 84–105.
Zimman, Lal. 2019. Trans
self-identification and the language of neoliberal selfhood: Agency, power, and the limits of monologic
discourse. International Journal of the Sociology of
Language 2561: 147–175.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Goldenberg, Julieta & Rogers Brubaker
2024. Emerging Pronoun Practices After the Procedural Turn: Disclosure, Discovery, and Repair. Sociological Science 11 ► pp. 91 ff.
Shaw, A.L., A.G. Williams, G.K. Stebbings, M Chollier, A. Harvey & S.M. Heffernan
2024. The perspective of current and retired world class, elite and national athletes on the inclusion and eligibility of transgender athletes in elite sport. Journal of Sports Sciences 42:5 ► pp. 381 ff.
Jones, Lucy
2023. Language, gender and sexuality in 2022. Gender and Language 17:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
YILDIRIMÇAKAR, Ziyattin
2023. Lêgerîna Kurmanciyeke Standard: Lêkolîneke Kalîtatîv bi Mamosteyên Zanîngehê yên Beşên Kurdî re. Kurdiname :9 ► pp. 15 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.