Cover not available
Article In:
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 14:1 (2025) ► pp.1–31

“That 3-word-ultimatum”

The relationship escalator and normative romance in metalinguistic commentary about I love you

 | Concordia UniversityMontréal, Canada
ORCID logo | University of CaliforniaSanta Barbara, USA
I love you is among the most meaningful utterances in English speakers’ organization of intimacy, yet remains understudied by scholars of language. This article investigates metapragmatic discourse about the first exchange of I love you between romantic partners using data from the social media platform Reddit. The discourse reveals a normative model in which I love you functions not only as an expression of emotion but a speech act that is ideologically constructed as committing the speaker and inviting the listener onto a relationship path that includes monogamy, long-term commitment, and eventually cohabitation and marriage. Normative discourses about and practices surrounding I love you thereby bolster the hypervalorization of romantic relationships, the validation of jealousy and possessiveness as expressions of love, and the naturalization of monogamy and normative Western family structures. Drawing on discourses of polyamory, asexuality, and disability/neurodivergence, we point to alternative possibilities for love’s meaning and expression.
Keywords: love, romance, normativity, emotion, relationships, intimacy, monogamy, online, online discourse
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Love, language, and normativity
    • 2.1Love, culture, and normativity
    • 2.2 I love you as performative speech act: Sincerity vs. timing
  • 3.Data and methods
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Analytic methods
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1Friends or “more”? The uncertain meaning of I love you
    • 4.2 I love you as an invitation onto the relationship escalator
      • 4.2.1Jealousy and monogamy
      • 4.2.2Don’t try this at home: Accelerating the escalator
    • 4.3“That 3-word-ultimatum”: Sincerity, timing, and intentionality
      • 4.3.1 The ultimatum of I love you
      • 4.3.2Fulfilling the sincerity condition — or not
      • 4.3.3 Alternatives to I love you
      • 4.3.4 Intentionality behind the first I love you
    • 4.4Happily ever after: Measuring the success of relationships
    • 4.5The story of I love you as the story of the relationship
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (55)
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ahearn, Laura. 2001. Invitations to Love: Literacy, Love Letters, and Social Change in Nepal. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahearn, Laura M. 2003. Writing desire in Nepali love letters. Language & Communication 23(2): 107–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barcelona Sánchez, Antonio. 1995. Metaphorical models of romantic love in Romeo and Juliet . Journal of Pragmatics 24(6): 667–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlant, Lauren. 1998. Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry 24(2): 281–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borba, Rodrigo & Milani, Tommaso M. 2017. The banality of evil: Crystallised structures of cisnormativity and tactics of resistance in a Brazilian gender clinic. Journal of Language and Discrimination 1(1): 7–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandley, ben & Dehnert, Marco. 2024. “I am not a robot, I am asexual”: A qualitative critique of allonormative discourses of ace and aro folks as robots, aliens, monsters. Journal of Homosexuality 71(6): 1560–1583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira. 2004. Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33(4): 469–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 401–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canning, Dominique A. 2015. Queering asexuality: Asexual-inclusion in queer spaces. McNair Scholars Research Journal 81: Article 6.Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 1997. “I just called to say I love you”: Love and desire on the telephone. In Language and Desire: Encoding Sex, Romance and Intimacy, Keith Harvey & Celia Shalom (eds), 143–169. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cocks, Harry & Houlbrook, Matt (eds). 2006. Palgrave Advances in the Modern History of Sexuality. Palgrave Advances. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Lappe, Joseph. 2016. Asexual activism. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies, Angela Wong, Maithree Wickramasinghe, renée c. hoogland & Nancy A. Naples (eds), np. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dean, Brian. 2021. Reddit usage and growth statistics: How many people use Reddit in 2021? BACKLINKO. 〈[URL]〉 (May 7, 2021)
Deri, Jillian. 2012. Polyamory or polyagony? Jealousy in open relationships. In Emotions Matter, Dale Spencer & Alan Hunt (eds), 223–239. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2008. The emotional weight of I love you in multilinguals’ languages. Journal of Pragmatics 40(10): 1753–1780. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Decker, Julie Sondra. 2015. The Invisible Orientation: An Introduction to Asexuality. New York: Skyhorse Publishing.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, Robert Englebretson (ed), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duggan, Lisa. 2003. The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Duggan, Maeve & Smith, Aaron. 2013. 6% of online adults are Reddit users. Pew Research Center. 〈[URL]〉 (May 7, 2021)
Ehrlich, Susan. 2014. Language, gender, and sexual violence: Legal perspectives. In The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds), 452–470. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enriquez, Laura E. 2020. Of Love and Papers: How Immigration Policy Affects Romance and Family. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gahran, Amy. 2017. Stepping Off the Relationship Escalator: Uncommon Love and Life. Boulder, CO: Off the Escalator Enterprises.Google Scholar
Grabois, Howard. 1999. The convergence of sociocultural theory and cognitive linguistics: Lexical semantics and the L2 acquisition of love, fear, and happiness. In Advances in Consciousness Research, Gary B. Palmer & Debra J. Occhi (eds), 201–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Kira. 2003. Exceptional speakers: Contested and problematized gender identities. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds), 353–380. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haritaworn, Jin, Lin, Chin-ju & Klesse, Christian. 2006. Poly/logue: A critical introduction to polyamory. Sexualities 9(5): 515–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Illouz, Eva. 1997. Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. & Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, Paul V. Kroskrity (ed), 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Kalyuga, Marika & Harbus, Antonina. 2007. Expressing love in English and Russian: Common and language-specific features. Scando-Slavica 53(1): 95–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kang, Dredge Byung’chu. 2017. Eastern orientations: Thai middle-class gay desire for “white Asians.” Culture, Theory and Critique 58(2): 182–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia. 2005. “Speaking as a heterosexual”: (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction? Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(3): 221–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klesse, Christian. 2011. Notions of love in polyamory — Elements in a discourse on multiple loving. Laboratorium 3(2): 4–25.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leap, William L. 2013. Queering language and normativity. Discourse & Society 24(5): 643–648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddiard, Kristy. 2018. The Intimate Lives of Disabled People. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lindholm, Charles. 1998. Love and structure. Theory, Culture & Society 15(3–4): 243–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, Nicci. 2016. “I thought I’d be safe there”: Pre-empting blame in the talk of women reporting rape. Journal of Pragmatics 96(1): 96–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2018. Language and sexual normativity. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (eds). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Coming out — seducing — flirting: Shedding light on sexual speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics 1701: 256–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Gary B., Bennett, Heather & Stacey, Les. 1999. Bursting with grief, erupting with shame: A conceptual and grammatical analysis of emotion-tropes in Tagalog. In Languages of Sentiment, Gary B. Palmer & Debra J. Occhi (eds), 171–200. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parikh, Shanti. 2015. Regulating Romance: Youth Love Letters, Moral Anxiety, and Intervention in Uganda’s Time of AIDS. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Perrino, Sabina & Pritzker, Sonya E. 2019. Language and intimate relations. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (eds). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramey, Emilia Murry & Ramey, Jody John. 2008. Autistics’ Guide to Dating: A Book by Autistics, for Autistics and Those who Love Them or who are in Love with Them. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1982. The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and Speech Act Theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11(2): 203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sattelberg, William. 2021, April 6. The demographics of Reddit: Who uses the site? Alphr. 〈[URL]〉 (May 7, 2021)
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. & Vanderveken, Daniel. 1985. Speech acts and illocutionary logic. In Logic, Thought and Action, Daniel Vanderveken (ed), 109–132. Norwell, MA: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tissari, Heli. 2005. LOVE in words. In Perspectives on Variation: Sociolinguistic, Historical, Comparative, Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds), 143–176. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thennarasu, Sakkan. 2011. The construction “I love you” Comparative accounts in Tamil and English. Language in India 111: 322–339.Google Scholar
Urman, Jennie Snyder, O’Toole, Jessica, Rardin, Amy (Writers), and Briesewitz, Uta (Director). 2015. Chapter seventeen (Season 1, Episode 17) [television series episode]. In Jane the Virgin, Jorge Granier, Gary Pearl, Ben Silverman, and Jennie Snyder Urman (Executive Producers). Poppy Productions; RCTV; Electus; CBS Television Studios; Warner Brothers Television.Google Scholar
Weninger, Tim, Zhu, Xihao Avi & Han, Jiawei. 2013. An exploration of discussion threads in social new sites: A case study of the Reddit community. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, 579–583. Niagara, Ontario, Canada: ACM Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn & Wilson, Elizabeth A. 2015. Introduction: Antinormativity’s queer conventions. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 26(1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimman, Lal. (2020). Transgender language, transgender moment: Toward a trans linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, Kira Hall & Rusty Barrett (eds). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar