Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 3:2 (2014) ► pp.219–244

“God loves you and it gets better”

Ideology, deixis and agency in an anti-homophobic bullying viral campaign

| American University, Washington DC, USA
The ‘It Gets Better Project’ (IGBP) is an online anti-homophobic bullying initiative directed at lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth. To date, 50,000 user-generated IGBP videos have attracted over 50 million views. In this critical discourse analysis of IGBP videos in the “Faith” category, I note how the projected ideologies therein overlap with and depart from conservative Christian rhetoric in surprising ways. I ask what gets better, for whom, and how that might happen. I then compare messages uploaded by laypeople and spokespeople of religious institutions. I argue that neoliberal assumptions are frequently evident in laypeople’s emphases on individualism, economic success, urban spaces and heteronormative conceptions of time. Spokespeople, conversely, tend to emphasize community-based opposition to homophobia in the here and now. This ideological struggle highlights barriers to “it getting better” in the present but also creates space for politics of redistribution and an unexpected queering of societal norms.
Keywords: homophobia, youth, bullying, neoliberalism, faith, internet, deixis
Published online: 8 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.3.2.03gui
References (41)
Ahearn, Laura. 2012. Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1971. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2008. ‘Eligible’ bachelors and ‘frustrated’ spinsters: Corpus linguistics, gender and language. In Gender and Language Research Methodologies, Kate Harrington, Lia Litosseliti, Helen Sauntson & Jane Sunderland (eds), 73–87. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, Tom. 2007. When marriage falls: Queer coincidences in straight time. Gay and Lesbian Quarterly 13(2-3): 227–248.Google Scholar
Brown, Gavin. 2012. Homonormativity: A metropolitan concept that denigrates ordinary gay lives. Journal of Homosexuality 59(7): 1065–1072. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Decena, Carlos Ulises. 2008. Tacit subjects. Gay and Lesbian Quarterly 14(2-3): 339–359.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Rob. 2012. RGOD2: What LGBT people might expect from a Mormon president. San Diego Gay and Lesbian News. April 20, 2012. [URL] (April 20, 2012)Google Scholar
Duggan, Lisa. 2002. The new homormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, Russ Castronovo & Dana D. Nelson (eds), 175–194. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Earle, Sarah & Sharp, Keith. 2007. Sex in Cyberspace: Men Who Pay for Sex. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2012. Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, James Paul Gee & Michael Haniford (eds), 9–20. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foderaro, Lisa W. 2010. Private moment made public, then a fatal jump. The New York Times. September 29, 2010. [URL] (April 2, 2012)Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2000. Rethinking recognition. New Left Review 3(May-June 2000): 107–120.Google Scholar
Graeber, David. 2009. Neoliberalism, or the bureaucratization of the world. In The Insecure American: How We Got Here and What We Should Do About It, Hugh Gusterson & Catherine Lowe Besteman (eds), 79–96. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Mary L. 2009. Out in the Country: Youth, Media, and Queer Visibility in Rural America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 2005. In a Queer Time and Place. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 2001. Encoding/decoding. In Media and Cultural Studies: Key Works, Meenakshi Gigi Durham & Douglas M. Kellner (eds), 163–173. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IGBP. 2013. It gets better project. [URL] (April 17, 2014)
Johnson, Chris. 2012. Gingrich: Media has anti-Christian bias on marriage. The Washington Blade. January 8, 2012. [URL] (March 31, 2012)Google Scholar
Knopp, Lawrence. 1998. Sexuality and urban space: Gay male identity politics in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. In Cities of Difference, Ruth Fincherand & Jane M. Jacobs (eds), 149–176. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Leap, William. 2009. Professional baseball, urban restructuring and (changing) gay geographies in Washington DC. In Out in Public: Lesbian and Gay Anthropology in a Globalizing World, Ellen Lewin & William L. Leap (eds), 201–220. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2010. Globalization and gay language. In The Handbook of Language and Globalization, Nikolas Coupland (ed), 555–574. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leitner, Helga, Sheppard, Eric, Sziarto, Kristen & Mariganti, Anant. 2003. Contesting urban futures: Decentering neoliberalism. In Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers, Helga Leitner, Jamie Peck & Eric Sheppard (eds), 1–25. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1984. Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Sean. 2003. Santorum under fire for comments on homosexuality. CNN.com. April 22, 2003. [URL] (April 17, 2014)Google Scholar
Michaelson, Jay. 2012. Santorum’s homophobia problem. The Huffington Post. January 4, 2012. [URL] (March 31, 2012)Google Scholar
Modan, Galey. 2007. Turf Wars: Discourse, Diversity and the Politics of Place. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ong, Aihwa. 2006. Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penelope, Julia. 1990. Speeking Freely: Undoing the Lies of the Fathers’ Tongue. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, David James. 2010. The ‘basis for a just, free, and stable society’: Institutional homophobia and governance at the Family Research Council. Gender and Language 4(2): 257–286.Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir K. 2010. In the wake of it gets better. The Guardian. November 16, 2010. [URL] (March 30, 2010)Google Scholar
. 2011. Coda: The cost of getting better. Gay and Lesbian Quarterly 18(1): 149–158.Google Scholar
Quiet Riot Girl. 2010. It gets better: What does? For whom? Quiet Riot Girl: The Thinking Crumpet’s Blogger. [URL] (March 30, 2012)Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Dana. 2009. Heteronormativity and homonormativity as practical and moral resources: The case of lesbian and gay elders. Gender & Society 23(5): 617–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santiago, Silviano. 2002. The wily homosexual (first – and necessarily hasty – notes). In Queer Globalizations: Citizenship and the Afterlife of Colonialism, Arnaldo Cruz-Malavé & Martin F. Manalansan IV (eds), 13–19. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Savage, Dan & Miller, Terry. 2010. It gets better: Dan and Terry. [URL] (February 12, 2012)
Thomas, Philip. 2002. The River, the road, and the rural-urban divide: A postcolonial moral geography from southeast Madagascar. American Ethnologist 29(2): 366–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tseng, Jason. 2010. Does it really get better? A conscientious critique. The Bilerico Project. [URL] (March 30, 2012)Google Scholar
Vitulli, Elias. 2010. A defining moment in civil rights history? The employment non-discrimination act, trans-inclusion, and homonormativity. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 7(3): 155–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Leap, William L.
2021. Moving into the next ten years. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.