Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Vol. 3:2 (2014) ► pp.219–244

“God loves you and it gets better”

Ideology, deixis and agency in an anti-homophobic bullying viral campaign

| American University, Washington DC, USA

The ‘It Gets Better Project’ (IGBP) is an online anti-homophobic bullying initiative directed at lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth. To date, 50,000 user-generated IGBP videos have attracted over 50 million views. In this critical discourse analysis of IGBP videos in the “Faith” category, I note how the projected ideologies therein overlap with and depart from conservative Christian rhetoric in surprising ways. I ask what gets better, for whom, and how that might happen. I then compare messages uploaded by laypeople and spokespeople of religious institutions. I argue that neoliberal assumptions are frequently evident in laypeople’s emphases on individualism, economic success, urban spaces and heteronormative conceptions of time. Spokespeople, conversely, tend to emphasize community-based opposition to homophobia in the here and now. This ideological struggle highlights barriers to “it getting better” in the present but also creates space for politics of redistribution and an unexpected queering of societal norms.

Keywords: homophobia, youth, bullying, neoliberalism, faith, internet, deixis
Published online: 8 August 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.3.2.03gui
References
Ahearn, Laura
2012 Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis
1971 Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul
2008 ‘Eligible’ bachelors and ‘frustrated’ spinsters: Corpus linguistics, gender and language. In Gender and Language Research Methodologies, Kate Harrington, Lia Litosseliti, Helen Sauntson & Jane Sunderland (eds), 73–87. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, Tom
2007 When marriage falls: Queer coincidences in straight time. Gay and Lesbian Quarterly 13(2-3): 227–248.Google Scholar
Brown, Gavin
2012 Homonormativity: A metropolitan concept that denigrates ordinary gay lives. Journal of Homosexuality 59(7): 1065–1072. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Decena, Carlos Ulises
2008 Tacit subjects. Gay and Lesbian Quarterly 14(2-3): 339–359.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Rob
2012 RGOD2: What LGBT people might expect from a Mormon president. San Diego Gay and Lesbian News. April 20 2012 [URL] (April 20, 2012)Google Scholar
Duggan, Lisa
2002 The new homormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics, Russ Castronovo & Dana D. Nelson (eds), 175–194. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Earle, Sarah & Sharp, Keith
2007 Sex in Cyberspace: Men Who Pay for Sex. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
2003 Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012 Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, James Paul Gee & Michael Haniford (eds), 9–20. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foderaro, Lisa W
2010 Private moment made public, then a fatal jump. The New York Times. September 29 2010 [URL] (April 2, 2012)Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy
2000 Rethinking recognition. New Left Review 3(May-June 2000): 107–120.Google Scholar
Graeber, David
2009 Neoliberalism, or the bureaucratization of the world. In The Insecure American: How We Got Here and What We Should Do About It, Hugh Gusterson & Catherine Lowe Besteman (eds), 79–96. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Mary L
2009 Out in the Country: Youth, Media, and Queer Visibility in Rural America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith
2005 In a Queer Time and Place. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart
2001 Encoding/decoding. In Media and Cultural Studies: Key Works, Meenakshi Gigi Durham & Douglas M. Kellner (eds), 163–173. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harvey, David
2005 A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2002 Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IGBP
2013 It gets better project. [URL] (April 17, 2014)
Johnson, Chris
2012 Gingrich: Media has anti-Christian bias on marriage. The Washington Blade. January 8 2012 [URL] (March 31, 2012)Google Scholar
Knopp, Lawrence
1998 Sexuality and urban space: Gay male identity politics in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. In Cities of Difference, Ruth Fincherand & Jane M. Jacobs (eds), 149–176. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Leap, William
2009 Professional baseball, urban restructuring and (changing) gay geographies in Washington DC. In Out in Public: Lesbian and Gay Anthropology in a Globalizing World, Ellen Lewin & William L. Leap (eds), 201–220. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2010 Globalization and gay language. In The Handbook of Language and Globalization, Nikolas Coupland (ed), 555–574. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leitner, Helga, Sheppard, Eric, Sziarto, Kristen & Mariganti, Anant
2003 Contesting urban futures: Decentering neoliberalism. In Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers, Helga Leitner, Jamie Peck & Eric Sheppard (eds), 1–25. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
1984 Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Sean
2003 Santorum under fire for comments on homosexuality. CNN.com. April 22 2003 [URL] (April 17, 2014)Google Scholar
Michaelson, Jay
2012 Santorum’s homophobia problem. The Huffington Post. January 4 2012 [URL] (March 31, 2012)Google Scholar
Modan, Galey
2007 Turf Wars: Discourse, Diversity and the Politics of Place. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ong, Aihwa
2006 Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penelope, Julia
1990 Speeking Freely: Undoing the Lies of the Fathers’ Tongue. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, David James
2010 The ‘basis for a just, free, and stable society’: Institutional homophobia and governance at the Family Research Council. Gender and Language 4(2): 257–286.Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir K
2010 In the wake of it gets better. The Guardian. November 16 2010 [URL] (March 30, 2010)Google Scholar
2011 Coda: The cost of getting better. Gay and Lesbian Quarterly 18(1): 149–158.Google Scholar
Quiet Riot Girl
2010 It gets better: What does? For whom? Quiet Riot Girl: The Thinking Crumpet’s Blogger. [URL] (March 30, 2012)Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Dana
2009 Heteronormativity and homonormativity as practical and moral resources: The case of lesbian and gay elders. Gender & Society 23(5): 617–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santiago, Silviano
2002 The wily homosexual (first – and necessarily hasty – notes). In Queer Globalizations: Citizenship and the Afterlife of Colonialism, Arnaldo Cruz-Malavé & Martin F. Manalansan IV (eds), 13–19. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Savage, Dan & Miller, Terry
2010 It gets better: Dan and Terry. [URL] (February 12, 2012)
Thomas, Philip
2002 The River, the road, and the rural-urban divide: A postcolonial moral geography from southeast Madagascar. American Ethnologist 29(2): 366–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tseng, Jason
2010 Does it really get better? A conscientious critique. The Bilerico Project. [URL] (March 30, 2012)Google Scholar
Vitulli, Elias
2010 A defining moment in civil rights history? The employment non-discrimination act, trans-inclusion, and homonormativity. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 7(3): 155–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Leap, William L.
2021. Moving into the next ten years. Journal of Language and Sexuality 10:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.