Article published In:
Who’s really normal? Language and sexuality in public space
Edited by Mie Hiramoto
[Journal of Language and Sexuality 4:2] 2015
► pp. 193222
References (41)
Agha, Asif. 1998. Stereotypes and registers of honorific language. Language in Society 271: 151–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 1999. “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28(2): 203–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira. 2005. Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4-5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 2005. Language, gender and sexuality: Current issues and new directions. Applied Linguistics 26(4): 482–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 1991. Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edley, Nigel. 2001. Analysing masculinity, interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In Discourses as Data – A Guide for Analysis, Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor & Simeon J. Yates (eds), 189–228. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Nigel & Mulkay, Michael. 1984. Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist 58(3): 473–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haviland, John B. 2005. ‘Whorish old man’ and ‘one (animal) gentleman’. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1): 81–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan. 2003. Gender and power in on-line communication. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, Janet Holmes & Miriam Meyerhoff (eds), 202–228. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Miyako. 2004. What does language remember? Indexical inversion and the naturalized history of Japanese women. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(1): 39–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2002. Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kang, M. Agnes & Chen, Katherine. 2014. Stancetaking and the Hong Kong Girl in a shifting heterosexual marketplace. Discourse & Society 25(2): 205–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lippman, Walter. 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang Kwong. 1990. Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. Neil, Stangor, Charles & Hewstone, Miles (eds). 1996. Stereotypes and Stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McGarty, Craig, Yzerbyt, Vincent & Spears, Russell (eds). 2002. Stereotypes as Explanations: The Formation of Meaningful Beliefs about Social Groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Laura. 2004. You are doing burikko! Censoring/scrutinizing artificers of cute femininity in Japanese. In Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People, Shigeko Okamoto & Janet S. Shibamoto Smith (eds), 148–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. Those naughty teenage girls: Japanese Kogals, slang, and media assessments. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2): 225–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth. 2012. Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carol. 1989. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. [1902]/1955. Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Justus Buchler (ed), 98–119. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1992. The uses and utility of ideology: Some reflections. Pragmatics 2(3): 311–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, John A. Lucy (ed), 33–58. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 271: 401–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3): 193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spender, Dale. 1980. Man Made Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Stangor, Charles (ed). 2000. Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sunderland, Jane. 2004. Gendered Discourses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Laurel A. 1995. Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, Kira Hall & Mary Bucholtz (eds), 279–296. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1982. Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology 33(1): 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TVB. 2009. 星期日檔案: 港男.講女 播出日期: 2009.03.08 (日) [“TVB (2009) Sunday Report: Kong Men talk about women. Broadcast 2009.03.08 (Sunday)”].
Vaisman, Carmel. 2011. Performing girlhood through typographic play in Hebrew blogs. In Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media, Crispin Thurlow & Kristine Mroczek (eds), 177–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, Yat-Zi. 2007. Kong Girl Bible. [葉一知 (2007) 港女聖經]. Hong Kong: FLY Media Ltd.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Hsu, Chan-Chia
2025. Further semantic change of the derogatory sociomorpheme tái in Chinese gender-related Internet neologisms. Language Sciences 107  pp. 101686 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Chun-Yi
2020. The effects of media exposure and language attitudes on grammaticality judgments. Global Chinese 6:1  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Chun-Yi
2021. New Masculinities in Online Discourse: A Text-Mining Approach. In Mediatized Taiwanese Mandarin [Sinophone and Taiwan Studies, 2],  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Chun-Yi
2021. Media Effects on Language Perceptions. In Mediatized Taiwanese Mandarin [Sinophone and Taiwan Studies, 2],  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Chun-Yi & Nicholas Garcia
2020. Mediatized Taiwanese Mandarin: A Text-mining Approach to Speaker Stereotypes. Open Linguistics 6:1  pp. 611 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.